Preview

The Ford/Firestone Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ford/Firestone Case
The Ford/Firestone Case

This case involves Ford and the Japanese tire manufacturer, Bridgestone/Firestone. The Ford Explorers which were prone to rolling over, came equipped with Firestone defected tires. The tire seemed to have a defect that caused the tread to separate from the whole of the tire and cause the vehicle to flip. Although Firestone knew about such defects, they continued to produce despite knowing the deadly consequences that lay behind their actions. The Explorer also had a bad reputation of rolling over and Ford knew it. As a result, fatal accidents occurred from these two combinations. Since this was a very serious safety issue, Ford and Firestone were ordering the recall of problem tires in Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Asia but not in the United States. So, did the company act ethically in resolving this crisis? No, the companies failed to fix the problem in the United States. According to NHTSA, the tires have caused many deaths and injuries in the United States. In fact, these accidents would have not occurred if both companies have solved the problem immediately. Thus, despite the obvious safety issues, there were also fundamental ethical issues.

Did they protect the health and well being of affected publics?
Ford and Firestone knew that they were having problems with their products before all of these accidents happened. For instance "Ford internal documents show the company engineers recommended changes to the vehicle design after it rolled over in company tests prior to introduction."(www.ratical.org/corporation) Moreover, "In 1998, mounting insurance claims already had indicated to financial staff members at Firestone that a problem existed with the tires." (www.ombuds.org.) But Ford and Firestone did not take any action to fix the problem. So it was obvious then that they were not concerned for the well being of the people. Even staff members who knew that the safety of customers was in danger due to the defect of these



Cited: http://www.citizen.org/articles.cfm?ID=5413 http://www.autosafety.org/article.php?scid=95&did=300 http://e-businessethics.com/firestone.htm http://www.forbes.com/2001/06/19/0619tires.html%20%20 http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=696 http://cee.citadel.edu/asee-se/proceedings/ASEE2002/P2002078INDUSBUR.doc

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the latest recalls involves two companies, which are the Ford Motor Company and Firestone. About 290,000 Firestone tires will be replaced on Ford cars; this action was taken after several accidents happened. Some of the accidents were associated with the death of the drivers. Firestone and Ford Motor’s reputation and public image were affected after this recall (Hakim, 2004).…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Did Ford exhibit “malice” which is necessary to establish in order to award punitive damages? (Yes)…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three social issues that are in this case are that one, social issue in this case was Ford claimed the reason for the recall of the 1.9 million Ford Pintos was not for safety but for “reputational” reasons. This is a social issue because, after all the evidence was piled up on their company for being unsafe and hazardous, they couldn’t just admit they made a mistake and recall the vehicles to make them safer. No, they had to use the reputation card to help their company’s image in the long run so they wouldn’t lose profit. In this issue, there is no utilitarianism because there mindset in making this decision isn’t for the right reasons. There not doing it to intentionally increase the safety of everybody. One version, rule-utilitarianism, considers that, “a rule or code of behavior is morally right if, by its application, the consequences are more favorable that unfavorable to everyone.” They weren’t being moral when they made this decision. The citizens and people had nothing to do with the recall. It was their own self-pity and arrogance. Another social issue in this case is that in June of 1978, Ford knew that its fuel tank did not meet Federal Safety Standards, yet they didn’t do anything to warn the owners of this. It’s a fact that if people were warned of this issue, thousands and thousands of people wouldn’t want to buy the Ford Pinto. Being that this was a social issue, Ford was all about making a profit and hid crucial information for the public. The third of many social issues in this case are that when Ford was being prosecuted in the courtroom, they defended themselves against negligence by claiming its car was comparable to other subcompacts at that time.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strange as it may seem, the Department of Transportation (NHTSA's parent agency) didn't know whether or not this was true. So it contracted with several independent research groups to study auto fires. The studies took months, which was just what Ford wanted. In May 1978 the Department of Transportation announced that the Pinto fuel system had a "safety related defect" and called for a recall. Ford agreed, and on June 9, 1978 the company recalled 1.5 million Pintos.…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After reviewing Ford Motor supply chain, we became aware of its very complex nature. Due to this complexity we are forced to search for alternatives to overcome the costly supply chain challenges faced by our industry both now and in the future. The present system has an inefficient control of a large database and a vast and complex network of suppliers.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pinto Fires

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another ethical issue in this case is rushing to get the Pinto in production and ignoring the failed crash-tests. They had prior knowledge that the fuel tank could rupture and continued production anyway. Once production was completed, and vehicles were on the road, a third related ethical issue started; the attention the recall coordinator was paying (or not paying) to reports of fuel tanks exploding from collisions.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ford claimed that its vehicles were not any less safe than other cars and that it had done everything…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of the Ford Pinto

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months, which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time, but they were not required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at that time. The vehicle was rushed into production anyway to compete with foreign compact cars being developed by the Japanese during that time period. Only after the vehicle was made available to the public was the vehicle tested. The Ford Pinto ended up failing the rear safety test, due to the fact that it was susceptible to fire from rear end collisions. Ford engineers determined that the problem could be resolved by installing a baffle, which protected the gas tank from being punctured during rear-end collisions. The part would have only cost between $6.65 and $11 to be install, but the Ford Motor Co. determined through cost-benefit analysis that the cost of lawsuits would be less than the cost of installing the baffle and decided not to install the baffle. Ford Motor Co. also failed to notify customers of the problem and offer them the option to have the baffle installed. Between 1971 and 1978 the Ford Pinto would be involved in thirteen rear-end collisions that caused the vehicle to start on fire. The actions of the Ford Motor Co. were scrutinized for the production of the vehicle. (DeGorge)While the vehicle did meet the safety standards of the time, Ford Motor Co. knew of the problem and did nothing to resolve it. This leads us to the question the ethical actions of the Ford Motor Co. production of the Ford Pinto. After realizing there was a safety issue with the Ford Pinto, was it morally right…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fords argument to the government was, “It would be cheaper in the long run to just let their customer’s burn!” How can this even be a dilemma or a problem? If that statement could be made, the vehicle is not the problem, the person in charge is. I have learned that in my attempts to save one dollar, in most cases the result is losing more. Although the text stated that Ford Pinto lost more than 50 million dollars in lawsuits and bad publicity, other text found on Engineering.com and Time.com states that Ford saved money by not correcting the problems. A summary table from Engineering.com states:…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Were both companies responsible for what happened? Were government regulations administered through the National Highway Traffic Safety…

    • 5382 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Was Ford aware of the potential problems in the framework of the Pinto? Was there an easy, inexpensive way to fix these problems? Was the Pinto fire controversy a lot of hype, or had Ford truly discounted human lives in order to save a few dollars? If Ford management really placed marketing considerations above safety, was that objective ethical and are members of management morally responsible for the preventable Pinto fire deaths?…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics is the discipline with the concept between good and bad based on morals. In this case were dealing with the Firestone and Ford Tire controversy. They were both beneficial companies in this society. Henry Ford was the person who founded the company Ford Motor Company. It was largely responsible for initiating the era of mass-consumption and mass-production in the American economy. Ford’s business provided people, standardization, the assembly line, and high wages for workers. The Firestone Tire Company was founded on a determination to offer the quality and services offered. If Firestone and Ford Tire companies started off well what made them a huge controversy or what could have gone wrong with Firestone and Ford Tire company? It all…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blaw Paper

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical dilemmas face many companies who are in business to provide services, sell goods or those that do both. Such dilemmas occur when a company has decided to go against the rules and regulations set out to govern their activities. They usually prove costly and the affected companies have to find ways to correct their mistakes. During this correction of mistakes, organizations tend to be sly as they only seek out ways in which they can benefit from such calamities without taking full responsibilities for their actions. This research evaluates the ethical dilemmas facing the Jackson-Miller Corporation.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ford Pinto Essay

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The case of Ford Motor Company producing the Pinto is a clear example of unethical behavior on the part of an automobile manufacturer, where a potentially dangerous product was knowingly released into the market. While there are some good consequences from the action, such as the jobs that were provided to American employees producing the car, and the individuals provided with an affordable vehicle, these were far outweighed by the negative effects, such as the potential danger from the number of Americans driving the car, those that were actually harmed in crashes, and, eventually, the effects on the Ford employees themselves after their company gained…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case study Case Overview Three men were arrested following a public appeal where a red Ford Focus was stolen from Bournemouth town centre, and used in an armed robbery of a bookmaker in Winton. Two of the men deny any involvement in the crime and the third admits to being the getaway driver. During the robbery the masked man carrying the sawn off shotgun fired it into the ceiling demanding everyone to lie on the floor. He then assaulted the store manager using the shotgun and forced him to open the safe, then placed the money in a cloth bag. The men left the scene in the vehicle reported stolen an hour earlier.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics