Preview

The Fool

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
691 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fool
The Fool – King Lear
The Royal Shakespeare Company writes of the Fool:
There is no contemporary parallel for the role of Fool in the court of kings. As Shakespeare conceives it, the Fool is a servant and subject to punishment ('Take heed, sirrah – the whip ' 1:4:104) and yet Lear's relationship with his fool is one of friendship and dependency. The Fool acts as a commentator on events and is one of the characters (Kent being the other) who is fearless in speaking the truth. The Fool provides wit in this bleak play and unlike some of Shakespeare's clowns who seem unfunny to us today because their topical jokes no longer make sense, the Fool in King Lear ridicules Lear's actions and situation in such a way that audiences understand the point of his jokes. His 'mental eye' is the most acute in the beginning of the play: he sees Lear's daughters for what they are and has the foresight to see that Lear's decision will prove disastrous.[8]
Writes Jan Kott, in Shakespeare Our Contemporary,
The Fool does not follow any ideology. He rejects all appearances, of law, justice, moral order. He sees brute force, cruelty and lust. He has no illusions and does not seek consolation in the existence of natural or supernatural order, which provides for the punishment of evil and the reward of good. Lear, insisting on his fictitious majesty, seems ridiculous to him. All the more ridiculous because he does not see how ridiculous he is. But the Fool does not desert his ridiculous, degraded king, and accompanies him on his way to madness. The Fool knows that the only true madness is to recognize this world as rational.

* Touchstone in As You Like It * The Fool in King Lear * Trinculo in The Tempest * Costard in Love's Labours Lost * Feste in Twelfth Night * Launcelot Gobbo in The Merchant of Venice * Lavache in All's Well That Ends Well * A Fool in Timon of Athens * Puck in A Midsummer Night's Dream * Thersites in Troilus and Cressida *

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear then begins to once more lose his sanity. In this scene the reads can see how Lear’s judgment and perception are affected by Alzheimer’s disease. Having recovered his sense with the fool and Kent just moments earlier King Lear loses them just as fast as he regain them. Kent advises Lear to go inside the temporary shelter they found to which Lear responds with a speech about how this storm is nothing compared to his emotional pain; “When the mind’s free, / the body’s delicate. The tempest in my mind / doth from my senses take all feeling else. Save what beats there—filial ingratitude” (III.iv.11-14). The reader is now becoming aware that the loss of Cordelia and the reality that his two other daughters do not love him as much as they had said. Someone who suffers from Alzheimer’s are prone to depression, which can be the reason to Lear’s emotional suffering in this scene…

    • 2139 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Notes

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    These words reflect Lear's central trait throughout the play: he is in denial of reality at every turn. Even now, in his madness and defeat he cannot face the harsh inevitability that neither he nor his daughter is likely to survive.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Sanity of Hamlet

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In both Hamlet and King Lear, Shakespeare incorporates a theme of madness with two characters: one truly mad, and one only acting mad to serve a motive. The madness of Hamlet is frequently disputed. This paper argues that the contrapuntal character in each play, namely Ophelia in Hamlet and Edgar in King Lear, acts as a balancing argument to the other character's madness or sanity. King Lear's more decisive distinction between Lear's frailty of mind and Edgar's contrived madness works to better define the relationship between Ophelia's breakdown and Hamlet's "north-north-west" brand of insanity. Both plays offer a character on each side of sanity, but in Hamlet the distinction is not as clear as it is in King Lear. Using the more explicit relationship in King Lear, one finds a better understanding of the relationship in Hamlet.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Madness

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The irony Shakespeare exploits in both Hamlet and Lear is that, while characters dissembling madness feature in both, so does the idea that madmen lack hypocrisy and speak the truth. Hamlet’s apparent madness allows him to blurt out truths and shrewd aphorisms along with nonsense, causing Polonius to say, ‘Though this be madness yet there is method in’t’, and ‘How pregnant sometimes his replies are – a happiness that often madness hits on, which reason and sanity could not so prosperously be delivered of’.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In King Lear virtually every character is either a fool or a knave; however these terms contain multiple layers. The crucial scene in which this idea is presented in the play is act 2 scene 4 when the Fool talks to Kent after he has been put in the stocks, and more specifically his line “The knave turns fool that runs away;/ The fool no knave, perdy.” On one level the Fool is mocking Kent for his loyalty towards Lear despite the fact that Lear’s fortunes have disintegrated, and seems to imply that a clever knave would grab the “great wheel” that is Lear, when his fortunes are up and drop him when they are down. Yet, the Fool also says that a self-interested knave “who serves and seeks for gain” abandons his friends while the virtuous fool will “tarry” and “stay”. Elizabethan England was a very hierarchical society that demanded absolute deference be paid to the wealthy and the powerful, however King Lear demonstrates how fragile this society actually was; parents and noblemen were vulnerable to the depredations of the unscrupulous younger generation. In this way Shakespeare divides society within the play and allows the viewer to make a moral decision as to whose side they choose. Aristotle believed that the very nature of ‘tragedy’ has a cathartic effect on the viewer, purging him of negative emotion, but there is also a sense that this genre of play forces us to choose some characters over others, and Shakespeare depicts the fools in the play, both honest and loyal and willing to weather out the storm with those who are suffering, as the positive characters we sympathise with and ‘choose’ above the clearly selfish knaves.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Play writers and authors commonly use blindness to symbolize ignorance or the refusal to see the truth, and Shakespeare was no exception. In King Lear, Shakespeare brilliantly uses the blindness of characters to symbolize ignorance. In the play, there are two main characters among the main plot and the subplot; Gloucester and King Lear. Both Gloucester and Lear lead troubling lives, one is a narcissistic king, and the other a bad father, which blinds them to the truth because they somewhat neglect the feelings of others. Eventually, their children simultaneously think of plans to betray their fathers; Lear’s daughters, Regan and Goneril, hope to kick him out of his kingdom and Gloucester’s son, Edmund, attempts to trick him into killing his…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Later on, the Fool shows regret for Lear's reduced status. Lear then becomes angry and declares he will go to Regan's castle instead assuming she would welcome him. Lear attacks Gonerill's ingratitude and defends his followers' honour. After this, in rage, Lear curses Gonerill with no children and if she did have children, they would be disobedient and unloving.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's King Lear, the Fool is a source of chaos and disruption in King Lear's tumultuous life. The Fool causes the King distress by insulting him, making light of his problems, and telling him the truth. On the road to Regan's, the Fool says "If thou wert my Fool, nuncle, I'd have thee / beaten for being old before thy time." (1.5.40-41). He denies the king the respect due to him as an aged King, causing the King to wonder at his worthiness. The fool also makes light of Lear's qualms making snide remarks in response to Lear's ruminations. When Lear asks Edgar cryptically, "wouldst thou give ‘em all?" the Fool responds, "Nay, he reserved a blanket, else we had been all shamed" (3.4.69-72). The Fool's snide remarks do little to maintain Lear's fragile control of his faculties. However, the Fool speaks to the king candidly, a rare occasion in Lear's life. Even Kent acknowledges the truth of the Fool's statements, saying, "This is not altogether fool, my lord" (1.4.155).…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anger and Shakespeare

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Insanity, occupying a critical place in the play is allied to both chaos and hidden wisdom. The Fool proffers insight to Lear in a seemingly mad babble. Later, in an unenviable state Lear’s personal tumult mirrors the chaos that has descended upon his kingdom. His overwhelming pride takes a heavy beating with the storm raging to humble him, providing him with vital acumen that shrinks him to his bare humanity, stripped of all royal pretensions.…

    • 3375 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fool is an essential character role in this drama. Like we said earlier, the fool was allowed to point out the King’s mistakes. He is the only one that can and anyone else could be put to the death if they did. He would not be blunt about it, but rather humorous and sarcastic to ease the truth. This would allow the King not to get angry so he would not make irrational decisions. When the fool is calling out the King’s wrong, he is being his moral and spiritual ego. Allowing the King to see what is right and the correct way to approach an issue. The fool also travels wherever the King goes. The fool is like a butler or bodyguard in that…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The notion that humanity is possessed only by those who understand and perceive the basic human condition can be seen to be explored in King Lear. Lear’s advancing madness allows him to perceive reality once he is stripped of his title and reduced to “nothing” during the storm scene; that is, that man is merely a “poor, bare, forked animal” and that he, for all his royalty, is “no more than this”. Imagery is utilised to affirm his epiphany and accept his insignificance as a mere mortal. In his humility, Lear is able to understand the values of humanity, demonstrated when he bids Cordelia not to resist being jailed, an indication that he has discovered that true filial love is more important than fighting for the material concepts of rank, property and power.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Who thought Lear to be “A prime example of the absurd”? Comments on how twentieth century critics often try to put King Lear.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the very beginning of the play, Shakespeare suggests that King Lear has much to learn. As Maynard Mack explains in his essay “Action and World in King Lear,” the reader/audience is immediately invited to sense that Lear is “too deeply . . . comfortable and secure in his ‘robes and furr’d gowns’, in his rituals of authority and deference . . . and in his childish charades” (170). In other words, there is an immediate sense that Lear is not…

    • 3447 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wyrd Sisters Quotes

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, the fool was loyal to King Verence and consequently the Duke after he takes the throne, saying that “a Fool should be faithful to his master until the very end, after all others have deserted him. Good or bad doesn't come into it. Every leader needs his Fool. There is only loyalty. That’s the whole thing. Even if he is clearly three-parts bonkers, I’m his Fool until one of us dies [sic]” (Pratchett 171). The Fool was expecting to serve Felmet until death, regardless of what either of them thought. He was going to stand by the Duke even in the face of fear, the Fool was willing to die for his King. During the climax of the story, the Fool realizes that rather than a specific man he needs to serve the kingdom as a whole and stands up to the Duke. In doing so he willingly sacrifices himself, knowing that his proclamation of the Duke’s actions will not only result in his death but, will also result in the repair of the kingdom. The Fool’s loyalty to Lancre directly causes the removal of the Duke and Duchess and the reconstitution of a healthy kingdom. The Fool cared about Lancre and the people in it, he acted when no one else could and even went against his honor as a fool to do…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    between a bitter fool and a sweet fool. When Lear admits that he does not, the…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics