Preview

“the First World War Did Not Arise Primarily as a Result of Planned German Aggression” How Far Do You Agree with This Opinion?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
“the First World War Did Not Arise Primarily as a Result of Planned German Aggression” How Far Do You Agree with This Opinion?
“The First World War did not arise primarily as a result of planned German aggression” How far do you agree with this opinion?
Explain your answer, using sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy.
There has been some controversy as to what or who was to blame for the outbreak of the First World War. Some people have taken the opinion that the war arose as a result of “planned German aggression” such as sources two and three, whereas source one is of the opinion that the Germans went to war with “defensive” intentions and that they didn’t have any “special plan to dominate Europe”.
It can be argued that the Schlieffen Plan was openly rigid and brittle which meant that the Germans had no choice but to attack and violate Belgian neutrality. There was also the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand or the naval arms race which was taking place between Britain and the Germans can also be considered factors as to why the First World War arose in 1914.
Never the less, we can also argue that the war in 1914 arose primarily as a result of German aggression because the war was planned in order to achieve “great power status”. It is source two that presents the theory of Fritz Fischer, in which he states that “Germany bore full responsibility for the war”. Fischer is enforcing the point that Germany was indeed aggressive and power hungry, this would suggest a suitable motive for them to go to war and therefore disagree with the opinion above. Further on, source two once again refers to the power hungry nature of Germany. “War was the only final mean by which the ruling elites could seek to maintain their power”, you could interpret this quote in two ways, you could say that this suggests the Germans were in fact trapped and they could only see one way to go on, through war. However I think that the source in fact is suggesting that they wanted to expand throughout Europe to gain a greater power status, to do this they had to go

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    It is easy to suggest that Germany were primarily responsible for causing the First World War because of many reasons: Their seemingly aggressive nature towards other nations and the Kaiser’s imperial ambitions being the two most primary. The former of these arguments, the aggressive nature of Germany’s foreign policy is demonstrated by the huge increase (142%) in Germany’s defence budget between 1905 -1914. One could further argue that the mere existence of the Schlieffen plan and the fact that Germany had planned for an attack on two fronts, shows that Germany were prepared for war and were not drawn into it. Furthermore, with Tirpitz preferring to postpone the “great fight for one and a half years” in the War Council meeting of December 1912, one can only look at the…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Document C it shows the Growth in Armaments from 1890-1914 . The growth of Armaments is a Prime example of Militarism of World war I due to Nations eventually are going to use the weapons the build. Another example of Militarism being the underlying cause of World War I is found in Document D The Hammer or the Anvil which quotes” We don’t want to be become… the slaves of Humanity ‘ slaves of humanity.’ But we’ll only be able to keep ourselves at the fore if we realize that there is no welfare for us without power, without a strong army and a strong fleet.” This is stating that without an strong army on ready to fight in a instance Germany will be trampled by other strong nations. Therefore Germany and other Countries had the same idea and invested in weapons and war and therefore with all these weapons on standby they’ll eventually use…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was World War Two Inevitable

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The origins of the Second World War have been a contentious issue ever since the conflict ended in 1945. It is a topic which continues to provoke furious debate more than sixty years later. It was unquestionably Hitler’s war and was directly brought about by his actions in the 1930’s. However opinion is divided as to whether his actions were meticulously planned or was he simply an opportunist who pragmatically took each step as they arose naturally. Marshal Foch described the Treaty of Versailles “as a 20-year armistice, rather than an enduring peace” (www.timeshighereducation.co.uk). I will examine the events between the wars to determine if these events were preordained or if the horrors inflicted by the Nazis could have been avoided.…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914, war broke out in Europe between the most powerful countries. There were a number of reasons why World War One broke out and this essay will examine these reasons.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How far do you agree with this judgement? Explain your answer using sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy. (40 marks)…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    German Aggression Question

    • 1836 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The above judgement outlines a clear debate among historians as to whether German aggression was the main reason the First World War began in August 1914, or whether it was due to various other factors. Gordon Corrigan claims that it was due to German aggression and therefore represents the closest argument to the one made in the question. Corrigan also references Fischer to support his argument, and so supports the Fischer Theory, which holds Germany to be responsible for the outbreak of the First World War due to their aggressive foreign policy. Contrastingly, James Joll suggests that Germany’s defensive offensive war rooted from a fear of encirclement from the countries that it borders, and so presents the opinion most opposing to that of the question. L.F.C Turner’s opinion arises somewhere between the two other historians’ arguments, and states that Germany was aggressive during Europe’s last month of peace before war, but there were other factors that should be considered equally.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For many Historians, the responsibility for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914 has been an area of great debate. Historians such as Gordon Corrigan in Source 1 support other historians such as Fischer who hold the view that it was primarily German aggression which caused the outbreak of war. Yet others, such as James Joll in Source 3 believe it was not purely Germany’s fault but the result of rising tensions among the entirety of Europe. L.F.C Turner, in Source 2, agrees to an extent with both of the views. However, on the face of it the view that German aggression was responsible for the outbreak of a general European War in August 1914 is the most compelling.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry Kissinger Email

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to Kissinger, Germany may not be solely responsible for the outbreak of World War I. There were other reasons for the start of the war, for example, the change in the balance of power, which led to an arms race amongst the European powers.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Selsdon

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain your answer, using Sources 1, 2 and 3 and your own knowledge of the issues related to this controversy.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    -1914 Feb: Kaiser Wilhelm, “Russo-Prussian (i.e. German) relations are dead once and for all. We have become enemies”…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    fgngn n

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dequantes Lamar dropped the summer hip-hop hit "Type of Way" in 2013 under his teenage nickname, Rich Homie Quan. He first considered a career in professional baseball, but in 2008, the Atlanta native dropped the single "Stay Down" featuring the Stack Money Boyz. Things came to a halt when he landed in jail for a year on burglary charges, but upon his release in 2011, Quan began to make up for lost time. Hooking up with the Atlanta crew Loyalty Ova Royalties and becoming quick friends with member CEO Teezy came next, but Teezy's untimely death later in the year put a stop to Quan's planned mixtape debut. He would re-emerge a year later on the T.I.G. label and drop the mixtapes I Go in on Every Song plus Still Goin' In. The year 2013 began with a tour opening for Trinidad James, along with a guest appearance on Gucci Mane's Trap House 3 album. In the summer, he dropped the infectious club track "Type of Way," which cracked Billboard's Hot 100 chart. ~ David Jeffries, Rovilkm-m-m-i -m,0ik0- ,k -9mik0ok0olo,0,o,l0o-,imefenf jrijfnfnsh djr3239020iofnv fijnijnjnnvivjevnkkkkkieie iwene9fn9efneuf9fn9skikicm992oe0lolfokfwoiejrudjsdksdjdc ijngv9ijijfokw362 dfok0ikf9wkfvm 9fk9ikwe9…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are endless accounts of the Great War. Different views from various angles of thought. Although it seems universal that most historians agree all the participants in Europe at the time expected a short war. Tensions were rising everywhere. Public statements from Empires relating to others as well as prior conflicts had already taken a toll on most nations’ collective psyche in Europe. This greatly affected how they would plan their future strategies in foreign policy, as well as war entry. The key theme among most of the region was that the eminent war would be necessary and swift. Winston Churchill was quoted as saying the fight would be a “cleansing thunderstorm” short and quick. How wrong he was. Having read Herwig’s work I find it to be obvious that Germany acted in aggression in the year 1914, as well as in the year’s preceding the start of the First World War, specifically Emperor Wilhelm II whose words from the War Counsel of 1912 were full of fire and brimstone towards Britain. What was not as explicitly pointed out, and seemed apparent, was the increasing dissolution or extinction of old world empires. I believe this evolution in Europe had much to do with the once powerful Habsburg Monarchy, who became the Austrian Hungry Empire, as well as the German Empire, both of whom didn’t realize they were breathing their last gasps of real breath. I contend that WWI was born of fear as much as aggression. Much like an aging boxer taking one last shot, hoping to regain the belt, but the new generation of fighter has already passed him by.…

    • 2275 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    german imperialism

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    German imperialism was the major concern of all rival nations in the years forgoing the war and their bid for continental supremacy, which intensified the closer to warfare Europe came, undoubtedly shaped the correct foundations for war but more importantly it portrayed it to be obligatory in order to achieve success. Many other nations such as Russia and Austria-Hungary adopted this belief and therefore aided generation of the war. “The German bid for supremacy was certainly decisive in bringing on the European war”*. This is illustrated in the latter stages of the 1800’s with the introduction of the expansionist policy of Weltpolitik – implemented by Kaiser Wilhelm in 1890 – which is a foreign policy aimed at achieving power by attaining an empire. There was an undisputable will to war amongst the German hierarchy throughout the 18th and 19th century and this is epitomised in their belief that major conflict was fundamental. Also the Austro-Prussian war of 1866 showed a clear attempt to expand and dominate the neighbouring areas of Germany. Wilhelm strongly believed that he had a divine right as leader to accomplish German authority and his attitude certainly caused Britain, France and Russia to create the triple entente between 1904 and 1907 as a defence mechanism. As we know, this alliance agreement plunged Europe into conflict with no real choice so therefore German bid for superiority can be seen as a direct cause of war.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany was mainly to blame for the outbreak Great War. Although other countries were partially to blame for there actions, which lead to the outbreak of war; it is clear that they only played a minor role in the eruption of the Great War. The Great War was caused by countless reasons and the extent to which these reasons were caused Germany depends on what actions the German leaders and ministers engaged in, to the lead up of 1914. We must consider Germany's lust for European domination, their entangled web of alliances, there strong sense of militarism, imperialism and nationalism which lead to many short term crises when we conclude that Germany was mainly responsible for the outbreak of the Great War.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    German foreign policy dramatically changed when Kaiser Wilhelm II forced Bismarck to resign in 1890. After Bismarck’s resignation, Kaiser set a new course for Germany. Wilhelm II made an emphasis on militaristic and expansionist policy while he tried to “defend” Germany’s “place in the sun”. This new offensive, provocative and irrational foreign political path ruined Germany’s relations with major European countries. German militarism, which is the crime of the last fifty years, had been working for this for twenty-five years.[1] First proof of Kaiser’s bad methodology came in 1893 when he failed to renew alliance with Russia. Now, the doors for Franco-Russian alliance were opened and the Bismarck’s worst fear about encirclement of Germany in case of war, was becoming a reality. In 1894, Franco-Russian alliance was ratified. In order to prevent fighting on two fronts, German Army Chief of Staff – Alfred von Schlieffen came up with a plan. This plan was worked out in the 1890’s and completed and changed a little bit by Von Molkte in 1906. The fact that Germany worked out the plan of attack and all the other countries had just plans how to defend themselves, is the reason why Germany was sole accused for causing the war. Schlieffen planned the attack and win over France to be faster than Russian mobilization. So, Germany…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays