Preview

The first past the post electoral system does more harm than good. Discuss.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The first past the post electoral system does more harm than good. Discuss.
The first past the post electoral system does more harm than good. Discuss.

First-past-the-post (abbreviated to FPTP or FPP) is a simple plurality electoral system that is used to elect all 650 MPs representing each constituency in the UK at the House of Commons and local authorities in England as is also the method US presidents and legislators are elected. It is founded upon OP-OV-OV – One person, One Vote and One Value system.
Each party select their candidate for the election and the elector has only one vote and simply places an X on a ballot paper against his/her preferred candidate that they wish to represent them. The winning candidate only needs to achieve a plurality of votes not the majority (plurality is the largest number of the group of numbers not the overall majority). Also in the case of the House of Commons whether a candidate wins by one or 14,000 votes the party gains a seat. There are no prizes for coming second in first-past-the-post.
In past years that proposition for electoral reform on our electoral system had gone unheeded ,first-past-the-post has been going unquestioned for a long period of time but in the most recent of general election in 2010 the Liberal Democrats are participating in government, because the first- past-the-post system gave to them a position where they held the balance of power in a hung parliament, also under first-past-the-post the Liberal democrats seem to be fairing the worst as for example in the 2010 general election the Conservative Party received 36.5% of the votes cast and obtained 47.2% of the seats in the House of Commons. The Labour Party received 29% of the votes cast but obtained 39.7% of the seats in the Commons. The biggest un-achievers from the first-past-the-post system (and in most other general elections in the last 80ish or so years) were the Liberal Democrats who received 23% of the vote however only succeeded in obtaining 8.8% of the seats in the Commons.
The advantages of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Each state has a number of electors equal to the number of its U.S. senators (2 in each state) plus the number of its U.S. representatives, which varies according to the state's population. Currently, the Electoral College includes 538 electors, 535 for the total number of congressional members, and three who represent Washington, D.C., as allowed by the 23rd Amendment. On the Monday following the second Wednesday in December,…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the votes that my MP and his competitors received, and the percentage of votes and seats that the national parties received, Canada’s electoral system is unfair and should be reformed. The electoral system is disproportionate, and with less than 50% of the vote, a given party could easily earn a majority of the seats. In turn, all the other parties are underrepresented. Another reason Canada’s electoral system should be reformed is because votes are seen as being wasted. Lastly, voters are misrepresented in the House of Commons.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Growing up as kids we were taught the design of our democracy and the constitutional principles. According to the Webster Dictionary a democracy is “ government in which people choose their leaders by voting, and where they are treated equally and have equal rights.” The definition does not capture what the United States feels it's a democracy. The United States is believe in the democratic ideology is, but is best known as a representative republic. In The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001: "Traditionally a republic is distinguished from a true democracy in that the republic operates through a representative assembly chosen by the citizenry, while in a democracy the populace participates directly in governmental affairs. In actual practice,…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine if you cast a ballot in the last election and after you cast your ballot you find out that the President was chosen by 538 delegates each from all different states. This is reality and that process is called the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because it does not reflect the common Americans opinion, also the process has not worked as there were many unqualified Presidents, finally, the delegates that elect the President are all very partisan towards their party…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite its flaws the ‘First past the post’ electoral systems for general elections suits Great Britain”…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College should not be abolished, because if it is then the election process would collapse. The Electoral College was created because “normal citizens” were not deemed worth of voting because they would not know what or who they were voting for. The system is built in a way that is complicated, but it works, here is how it works: all US states and DC get one electoral vote for each of their US Senators and Representatives. The Representatives’ votes are determined by the decennial census, and the US Senators have 2 per state. There are 538 votes in the Electoral College and all the candidate needs to get to win is 270 votes. This is a system that has been around since the Constitutional Convention, so why is there any reason to change it. The reason that it has been around for so long is because the Electoral College was made so that the two major political parties would have an advantage against the minority or third parties. They did this because the third parties focus too much on one issue and that would be disastrous for our government. But third parties do deserve to still be in the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Electoral College system was first established in the constitution by the Founding Fathers. The creation of Electoral College is to make sure every states is a viable participant in electing the president, in which giving the small population states a chance. In the day of election, people cast their votes for their candidate and who wins it determines the electors of the state. The system was great when it was first introduced because of how people before relied more in the electors who are very educated and wise, but now people are different has gained more knowledge and can determine who will be a good president. Although electoral college has served the United States since 1787, it has become unfair because it ignores the will of the people, it creates faithless electors, and it gives too much power to the smaller states.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mechanics of the United States Electoral College is fairly simple. Each state is assigned a certain number of electors. The number is derived from the total number of each state’s U.S. Senators plus the number of its members in the U.S. House of Representatives. Each of these electors meets in their respective state capitals and cast their vote for the offices of President and Vice President. These electors are supposed to represent the popular vote that took place the month before. These votes are tallied and a winner is declared.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. citizens are given the right to vote every four years in November. The electoral votes are based on the population of a state and affect the election in the long run. The Senate of a state is granted two electoral votes towards the national election. The rest of the electoral votes are based on the popular vote in the districts of a state. The Electoral College was created by the U.S. founding fathers because they were afraid that a dictator could manipulate the votes of the people. The Electoral College is a controversial topic because some people believe in keeping it, others believe in abolishing it, and some would just like it to be changed. The Electoral College should be abolished because it is outdated in the common era, it is unfair…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will be discussing the detriments and downfalls of the Electoral College. Now, before we delve into the gritty details of what the Electoral College actually is and how it functions, I must ask, do you actually know how the President of the United States is elected? The majority of Americans would simply say that they cast their vote and call it a day. They are entirely complacent with the system because they feel grounded in the belief that they are the ones truly in power. They believe in the “democratic ideals” that are encompassed within America. The fact of the matter is that their vote goes to a group of electors chosen by the state, who then choose the president. And the best part? These electors don’t necessarily have to pledge their vote to who the majority of people chose. This is not a true democracy in any sense and we should aspire to eradicate any system that limits our constitutional freedoms. The Electoral College is one of those systems, and it is defined as being “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president”. Are all eligible voters included within this “body of people”? If not, then…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every four years, Americans stand in lines, eager to vote for their candidate and hope they win. Sadly, many Americans don’t realize their influence on the election is pretty minimal. The votes go to the state, and whatever candidate has more votes in that state, wins the state. Even if the popular vote is for the opposite candidate that wins, hence 2016’s election. The Electoral College should be abolished, and be replaced in the constitution by the popular vote, which represents each individual's real vote.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College follows a winner-take all representative system, which means that the voices of some citizens will not matter. The Electoral College is a system of representatives included in the U.S. Constitution, created by the Founding Fathers, to help ensure that voters selecting the president were qualified and knowledgeable. These voters were chosen, because they knew what they were doing, rather than possible unreasonable voting by the public. However, this system is not required anymore, and can be detrimental to citizens of the United States of America. The Electoral College should be abolished, because it favors’ the voters of small states and because it does not accurately represent the voice of the people of the U.S.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays