The Fairness of Fair Value
1
The Fairness of Fair Value: SFAS 157, Irving Fisher and GECON Paulo Roberto B. Lustosa Professor , University of Brasilia Abstract Fair value measurement is increasingly spreading in accounting standards. In February/2010, it was present in 61 FASB pronouncements. Such diffusion led to the issuance of SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurements, in which many prior definitions and measurement requirements, presented in other pronouncements, were replaced by a single standard on this subject. But the expansion of situations in which fair value measurement is required makes more difficult to ensure that the computed measure of value is actually fair. Out of the objectivity of current sales prices in an active market, all other measures of value are expectations about the future, inherently uncertain and inaccurate. Thus, the desired justice of the computed figures lies not in its accuracy, but in the using of the correct concepts for measuring accounting transactions and events. This article examines whether it is correct the fair value concept and measurement structure present in SFAS 157. For such, the characteristics of this principle are confronted with the secular concept of capital and income set by the laureate American neoclassical economist Irving Fisher, which were incorporated into GECON – Information System for Economic Management – a Brazilian managerial accounting model developed in the University of Sao Paulo by the now retired professor Armando Catelli. The results indicate that SFAS 157 fair value concept and measurement structure are incorrect or incomplete, suggesting that the maintenance of the fair value expression in accounting seems inadequate. 1. Introduction The extensive discussion of fair value accounting has intensified with the outbreak of the financial crisis that shook the world in the last quarter of 2008. In face of the billionaires accounting losses recognized by banks and other institutions in marking to market their subprime-backed
The Fairness of Fair Value: SFAS 157, Irving Fisher and GECON Paulo Roberto B. Lustosa Professor , University of Brasilia Abstract Fair value measurement is increasingly spreading in accounting standards. In February/2010, it was present in 61 FASB pronouncements. Such diffusion led to the issuance of SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurements, in which many prior definitions and measurement requirements, presented in other pronouncements, were replaced by a single standard on this subject. But the expansion of situations in which fair value measurement is required makes more difficult to ensure that the computed measure of value is actually fair. Out of the objectivity of current sales prices in an active market, all other measures of value are expectations about the future, inherently uncertain and inaccurate. Thus, the desired justice of the computed figures lies not in its accuracy, but in the using of the correct concepts for measuring accounting transactions and events. This article examines whether it is correct the fair value concept and measurement structure present in SFAS 157. For such, the characteristics of this principle are confronted with the secular concept of capital and income set by the laureate American neoclassical economist Irving Fisher, which were incorporated into GECON – Information System for Economic Management – a Brazilian managerial accounting model developed in the University of Sao Paulo by the now retired professor Armando Catelli. The results indicate that SFAS 157 fair value concept and measurement structure are incorrect or incomplete, suggesting that the maintenance of the fair value expression in accounting seems inadequate. 1. Introduction The extensive discussion of fair value accounting has intensified with the outbreak of the financial crisis that shook the world in the last quarter of 2008. In face of the billionaires accounting losses recognized by banks and other institutions in marking to market their subprime-backed
References: BALL, R.; BROWN, P. An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research. v. 6, p. 159-178, 1968. BARTH, M. E.; BEAVER, W. H.; LANDSMAN, W. R. The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31, n.1-3, set, 2001. BEAVER, W. H. The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research Supplement 6, 1968. CANNING, J. B. The Economics of Accountancy: A Critical Analysis of Accounting Theory. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1929. CHAMBERS, R. J. Accounting, Evaluation and Economic Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1966. COASE, R. The nature of the firm. Economica 4, 1937, p. 386-405. EDWARDS, E. O. e BELL, P.W. The Theory and Measurement of Business Income. University of California Press, 1961. FASB. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157 – Fair Value Measurements, 2007. Accessed in www.fasb.org. FASB. Fasb Staff Position 157-4 – Fair Value Measurements, 2008. Ver em www.fasb.org. FISHER, I. The Nature of Capital and Income. NewYork. Cosimo, Inc., 2006. Republication of the 1906 original. GUERREIRO, R. Sistema de Informação de Gestão Econômica: Uma Contribuição à Teoria da Comunicação em Contabilidade. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, 1989. HENDRIKSEN, E.; VAN BREDA, M. F. Teoria da Contabilidade. São Paulo Atlas, 5ª. edição americana, 1999. IJIRI, Y. Studies in Accounting Research n. 31: Momentum Accounting and Triple-Entry Bookkeeping: Exploring the Dynamic Structure of Accounting Measurements. American Accounting Association, 1989. _______. Theory of Accounting Measurement. Studies in Accounting Research. Sarasota, Florida: American Accounting Association, 1975. IUDÍCIBUS, S. Teoria da Contabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, 5ª. edição, 1997. 15 LAUX, C.; LEUZ, C. The Crisis of Fair Value Accounting: Making Sense of the Recent Debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, 2009. MacNEAL, K. Truth in Accounting. Texas: Scholars Book Company, 1939. Reprinted in 1970. RYAN, S. G. 2008. Accounting in and for the Subprime Crisis. The Accounting Review, V. 83, n. 6, nov, 2008. SCHROEDER, R. G.; CLARK, M. W.; CATHEY, J. M. Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis: Text, Readings and Cases. New York: Englewood Cliffs, 8ª. Edição, 2005 SOLOMONS, D. Economic and Accounting Concepts of Income. The Accounting Review, 1961. STOCKER, M. e CRAIG, M. Undermining Accounting Rules, 2009. Consulted 2/25/2008, in www.investmentweek.co.uk/investment-week/feature/1563914/ WHITTINGTON, G. Fair Value and the IASB/FASB Conceptual Project: An Alternative View. Abacus, vol. 44, n.2, 2008. 1 There are many academic papers about the subprime financial crisis nature. The interested reader can consult, for example, the excellent work of Ryan (2008), which also evaluates to be improper the FAS 157 application in tense market situations, when transactions do not occur in normality (orderly transactions) , as sets the standard. 2 There are various works discussing the fair value accounting advantages and disadvantages. For instance, Laux and Leuz (2009). 3 Four out of these 37 standards are opinions APB - Accounting Principles Board, AICPA committee which preceded FASB in accounting standards issuance. 4 The word earned, used in Fisherian economic profit context, is income from actions performed on the events. 5 The opposite occurs in the decision to form the asset or liability. At the time of forming the liability, the rational decision maker seeks the lowest price in money market (lowest borrowing rate) and when he decides to form the asset, he compares the expected return with the higher return available on the market (lending rate).