John Brown had no reason to break the laws of the United States. Not only did he murder people but he attacked a federal facility. Which was completely useless because it didn’t help abolitionists at all. It made it worse because he gave abolitionist a bad name. John brown is a terrorist who had no need to murder people or attack a federal facility.…
Abraham Lincoln called John Brown a misguided fanatic! John Brown was not a misguided fanatic. John Brown tried his best to save the slaves from all the hard work and bring them to freedom, he just wanted slavery to end. Brown took a vow to end slavery when he found out that an abolitionist newspaperman was killed. He didn’t want anyone to harm the slaves, so he had a plan to save the slaves, he had a meeting with Frederick Douglass about the plan to save the slaves, so things wouldn't get out of hand, but Douglass opposed to his plan, Brown’s plan was to take over Harper’s Ferry, because Douglass knew that his plan would have failed and have also led to many black deaths, he thought that Brown would’ve hurt the abolition movement by causing…
John Brown held to the idea that non-free slaves had human rights and he had to be the one who would give them the right to be equal among all men. John Brown will always be famous for his Harpers Ferry Raid, and to some the start of the secession from the Union. So who really is John Brown? Is he a terrorist? I believe he is an anti-slavery activist and perhaps even an extreme abolitionist. I believe that even under the definition of a terrorist, a person who is a terrorist does not care about who he or she hurts or offends. The writer of the article commented on Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh as terrorist. They were tried with charges of: 8 counts of first-degree murder, Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, Use of a weapon of mass destruction, and Destruction with the use of explosives.…
Students of history and those merely interested in casual inquiry will often explore a topic, find a legitimate opinion, accept it at face value, and move on. Too often with young or inexperienced historians this is the case. It does, in a way, make sense. Many topics an individual will study have been researched and written on countless times. It is easy to accept an opinion as is and forget about it. John Brown is one of these subjects. Merrill D. Peterson’s John Brown explores the complicated nature of the legacy of this militant abolitionist. Brown has been, in the time since his departure, construed as a hero, a villain, an antihero, a well-meaning lunatic, and so on. The nature of his actions and the divisive context they are found in gives way to many different opinions. Peterson’s book explores these many definitions of John Brown. The opinions of historians, students, politicians, and the like are weighed against the validity of their status as historical interpreters, their knowledge of the subject, their biases, and Peterson’s own interpretations. John Brown’s legacy is an ambiguous and complicated one and Peterson’s book explores the warring opinions of observers on whether John Brown is hero, villain, or both.…
John Brown, in 1859, raided and killed seven innocent people in the South while attempting to free the slaves of the area and create a haven for them. Brown was convicted of murder and hanged. While Southerners may have hated Brown for his invasion their rights to own slaves, he was thought to be a martyr for the abolitionist cause in the North with his self sacrifice and deep devotion, further separating the two in both ideals and motives of pre-Civil War 1863.…
On October 16, 1859, John Brown, a radical abolitionist of the North, led a small army of 18 men into the small town of Harpers Ferry, Virginia. He seized the arms and ammunition in the federal arsenal and planned to arm slaves to instigate slave rebellions in the South. He was captured by the militia and Lieutenant Colonel Robert E. Lee’s troops, and was quickly sentenced to death. John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry received polarized comments. While he was hailed as a martyr by Chicago’s Republican press, Democratic newspaper in South Carolina and Illinois condemned him as a criminal. At the same time, the Northern press did not ask for the execration of Brown’s penalty in hopes of preserving the Union, but the South viewed this event as another strong reason for seceding. John Brown’s raid has a profound effect on deepening sectional and partisan divide between North and South.…
The 1850s was a time of disagreement especially on the topic of slavery, but using this as an excuse to commit JOhn Brown's bloodthirsty actions is wrong. Yes, people were violent, but John brown exceed violent. DOcument H explains how Harpers Ferry caused the disunion. If JOhn brown would have used more peaceful tactics slavery could have still been abolished. Looking at today's more recent history, Mandela, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr. all acted with peaceful tactics, but still achieved their goal. Document K is a picture of a giant John Brown standing holding a gun and a paper in the middle of the northerns and southerns in war. This shows how he was in the middle of this all and caused the war to happen. He is also holding a gun, indicating he is all for war and killing. On another note, he is stepping on someone’s head on the right side, leading me to believe this was a southerner. That shows he very clearly took a side in this war. Connecting, JOhn Brown went to extremes even in a time of conflict which was wrong and no one else of this time did…
John brown the radical abolitionist who believed in the violent overthrow of slavery. Brown was born in Torrington, Connecticut and he spent most of his childhood in Ohio. Brown’s father, was a very religious man, whose Calvinism formed the pillars of this family’s household. His professional life and some business failures which made him go into bankruptcy at age 42 and making him have more than 20 lawsuits filed against him. During the bleeding Kansas Brown led attacks on pro slavery and justified his actions as the will of God, soon becoming a hero in the eyes of Northern Extremities. Dealing with Brown meant coming to terms with violence that he unleashed.…
Frederick Douglas a famous abolitionist know for his writing and speeches was influenced by Brown when they spoke in Springfield, Massachusetts. Douglas later wrote, “From this night spent with John Brown in Springfield, Mass. in 1847, while I continued to write and speak against slavery, I became all the same less hopeful for its peaceful abolition. My utterances became more and more tinged by the color of this man’s strong impressions.” This is Douglas accepting to some extent that Brown had convinced him that his way was effective. Moreover, as Douglas began to spread his newfound ideas some of Brown’s ideas would be mixed in gaining the large audience that Douglas had acquired over the years. Brown’s actions weren’t merely violent attacks against pro-slavery civilians.…
A life in which an equal was treated like a worthless being is what many called a “standard home”. Unfortunately, Brown and many others were exposed to this atrocious mindset. Despite these influences, John Brown became a warrior in the battle for freedom of African Americans. Brown had been born into the 1800’s on May 9 within Connecticut before the Brown family moved to Ohio. Because of Brown’s religious upbringing, slavery was an unacceptable norm John wished to fight against. As the use of enslaved African Americans expanded, so did John’s hatred for the popular institution of slavery, resulting in him planning attacks with volunteers. He committed himself to creating these attacks and successfully carried out 2 before being captured- the Pottawatomie Creek attack and Harpers Ferry raid. Many could argue why John Brown qualifies for being a terrorist, yet he undoubtedly created a pathway for…
After John brown was executed, he is still one of the most talked about men in American History. John Brown is talked about a lot because of his big raid on Harpers Ferry. Brown’s raid was to go into Harpers Ferry to get the riffles so Brown and his men could free slaves and arm them to help him have a rebellion. Also, John Brown’s actions at Pottawatomie Creek is why he is also talked about. Brown went to Pottawatomie Creek because he didn’t want that state to become a slave state. So Brown went to three cabin with his four sons, and pulled out and…
John Brown was from Connecticut, born in strict religious family in 1800. At 12, after seeing a slave being brutally beaten, swore to never forget that day. In the mid 1800’s he decided to campaign against slavery in Kansas and Nebraska, so did the pro-slavery who campaigned for the continuation of slavery. With the murder of six anti-slaverists and that slave who was beaten many years ago, he decided that: “In order to end slavery, violence must be applied” (John Brown).…
Looking back in history, in the years leading up to the Civil War, many important events took place which defined the course of history and overall sparked the Civil War. John Brown was an abolitionist, born and raised in the North and with the conception that slavery was evil. Brown took extreme measures in the fight to abolish slavery once and for all in the South and West. His fight for ending slavery turned violent and turned into massacres and murdering sprees. After reviewing his actions, John Brown, must be remembered as a misguided fanatic, not a hero, as his beliefs did not justify his actions.…
Recently it came out that Ami Brown of Alaskan Bush People totally missed a visit from her estranged family. Ami's mom went up to Alaska to visit her, but Ami and the family were in Hawaii during that time and they never even got to see each other. Now Ami Brown's mom Earlene Branson is sharing her side of the story, and she isn't very happy that her big 83rd birthday didn't turn out that way she had planned. All that she had hoped for was to see Ami and hopefully, work things out with her after all these years. Radar Online got the chance to speak to her and find out exactly what Ami's mom had to say. She went clear from Texas to Alaska in hopes of reuniting with Ami and her family.…
Historians are not the only ones that can elucidate history. History is a extensive puzzle that can be solved by anyone who has an educated diploma on certain subjects. Historians are the main disposition to solve the uncertainty of history with their useful, quality skills of making theories to conjoin loose ends of history, motivation of repeated research, and their undying love to learn new history, but a psychologist can solve history too with their forte. Even though it may seem absurd to believe that this occupation who assesses a man's personality to solve problems; a psychologist can solve an dead man's prospective in life. A letter is a common communication device…