Preview

The Elite and Pluralist Approach to Governance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Elite and Pluralist Approach to Governance
This essay seeks to explain the Elitist and Pluralist approaches to governance and advance both positive and negative sides for each approach. It shall begin by defining the major terms/ concepts Governance, Elitist and Pluralist. The essay shall then explain in detail the two approaches respectively. Then it shall highlight the positives (merits) and negatives (demerits) for each approach. Finally the essay shall give a conclusion based on the main points of the essay.
Governance is the activity or process of making policy decisions and implementing them or the ability of government to create and implement public policy. It describes the mechanisms government uses to ensure that the citizenly follow and abide by its established policies and laws.
Elitist comes from the term elite which refers to a few selected individuals who dominate in a political system, have too much power concentrated in their hands to govern society because of their ability and greater organizational capacity, wealth, social origin or achievements. The Elitist approach is a conflict theory based on the belief according Aristotle that some people are meant to rule and others to be ruled. The rulers are those few individuals who get to the top by virtue of their superior quality. Cox, A. (1985; pg 107)
Pluralist comes from the term plural which refers to, “more than one or consisting of more than one”. And pluralism is a theory that reality is composed of a plurality of entities of society. Here the basic ideas of government are seen through the ideas of individuals and groups to ensure that all the needs and wants of society are taken care of. There is no right or wrong idea: everyone’s ideas are valid.
Having defined the main terms, we can now look at the two approaches in detail. In the first place, these models were developed in view of making government policies. Society exhibits various aspects of behavior that can cause anarchy in society and as such, need to be controlled and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    2. Many of our terms for describing the distribution of political power are derived from the ancient Greeks, who were the first Western people to study politics systematically. A society in which political decisions were controlled by a small group was called an oligarchy, meaning rule by a few members of the elite, who generally benefited themselves. Another form of rule by the few was known as aristocracy, meaning rule by the most virtuous, the most talented, or the best suited to the position. Later in European history, aristocracy meant rule by the titled or the upper classes. In contrast to such a top-down form of control was the form known as anarchy, or the condition of no government. Anarchy exists when each individual makes his or her own rules for behavior, and there are no laws and no…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an elitist government it is believed that only a select few of people should hold political power. People who are maybe from a higher class or wealthier than the others form the group of elites. Elitist point of views are taking much more serious and carefully than those who are outsiders to this group.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is much easier to contrast the four contemporary theories of American democracy than to compare them, as pluralist, hyperpluralist, elite and class, and traditional theory each highlights the competitive foundation of politics. Each contemporary theory investigates the underlying question "Who governs our nation" yielding significantly different conclusions. While the pluralist theory emphasizes that politics is merely a competition among groups - a competition overwhelmingly controlled by the wealthy according to elite and class theory - hyperpluralism contends that these groups weaken the political backbone rather than support it. Pluralism and hyperpluralism are similar in that both agree that groups indelibly impact society and therefore the government by pressing their concerns through organized efforts, however they differ as to whether the impact is positive or negative, respectively. Hyperpluralism also contrasts with elite and class theory stating that many groups - not just the elite ones - are so strong that the government is unable to act. It asserts that there are too many ways for groups to control policy, regardless of their organization, topic, or funding. Traditional democratic theory is composed of key principles that an ideal democratic process should consist of: voting must be representative, a population must participate, civic understanding, citizen control of agenda, and inclusion. The majority rule - in which the will of over half the voters is followed - guarantees equality, control, and inclusion, guaranteeing rights to those subject to the laws that follow the policy making process. A key aspect to the theory is equal representation from each citizen, which under hyperpluralist and elite and class theory is thought of as endangered or nullified by the power of groups and the wealthy, respectively. Pluralism suggests that democratic theory is successful because…

    • 364 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Gove Study Guide

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages

    Elite – identifiable group of persons who possess a disproportionate share of some valued resource- in this case political power…

    • 20135 Words
    • 81 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eth125 Week 5 Appendix E

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    |Pluralism |This is a state in which people of all ethnic as well as racial categories have about the same |…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the one hand, the view that Oligarchy exists within traditional structures is agreed with by the Elite theorists. This is because the elite theorists such as Pareto saw society as divided between the rulers and the ruled. They believe that society is ruled by one small powerful Elite, the ruling class. For example, the Government rule of society as they are able to implement laws and rules which people within society have to abide with. It exists within traditional power structures as the Government has been a traditional power holder in recent years.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 10, 11, and 6 Notes

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Elitism: the idea that a select few – better educated, more informed, more interested – should have more influence on government…

    • 4053 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 2 Notes

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A group of people with shared feelings or attitudes that try to influence government policy making. Pluralism leads to interest groups.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    |Pluralism |A condition in which numerous distinct ethnic, religious, or cultural groups are present and |…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 125 Week 5 Appendix E

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Pluralism |A state in which people of all racial and ethnic categories have about the same overall social |…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Larger Racial Minorities

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Pluralism |Is defined as a condition where different groups culturally, ethnically, or religiously are present|…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The circle of government

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the beginning of civilization, much of existing empires were built and crushed again, and again. Even though Roman Empire was strong and stable, they have also perished along with others. One of the philosopher in Italy, Niccolo Machiavelli, started wondering why there are no empires that remained eternal. So he started to gather his thoughts and finally found six types of government. He realized that some people say there are three and that some say there are six. Machiavelli also states that out of the six types of government, three among them are bad and three are good. He called it "The Circle of Government" because those six governments rotate in the period of time. Then he goes on to talk about how the government was formed. The first government is monarchy. At first the ruler was the strongest amongst a group of people. Afterwards they changed to looking for the wisest to rule. After that sovereignty was inherited through the sons of the ruler. However, the position of the ruler became being the selfish and stubborn instead of leading. Then he, Machiavelli, talks about people made to get rid of the ruler that he called "Revolution." After "Revolution," government became an "anarchy" and went back to monarchy form of the government. So simply, there is monarchy, tyrany, nobility, oligarchy, revolution, and anarchy form of government that he mentioned. Although he pointed out three good powers and bad powers, Machiavelli says that good powers are monarchy, nobility, and Revolution. These days "The Circle of Government" formed by Check and Balance does structure, Check and Balance, and make strong and powerful government.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: To analyse the compatibility of democracy with elitism it is first important to define both the terms democracy and elitism. Democracy is in its simplest form is the rule for the people by politicians etc, and elitism is most simply known as ‘a class that rules and a class that is ruled’. This therefore opens up the question, do those in higher positions effectively rule those lower down, democracy within elitism, and the effects if elitism was not around. ‘a minority which monopolises the effective exercise of power’. P69, schwarzmantel.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    It Timeline of 1920-2000

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Governance- Governance is the act of governing. It relates to decisions that define expectations, grant power, or verify performance. It consists of either a separate process or part of decision-making or leadership processes.…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    10. Pluralist Theory - An analysis of politics emphasizing the role of diverse and competing interest groups in preventing too much power being accumulated in the hands of political and economic elites.…

    • 5943 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays