The Effect of Leadership Style on Employee’s Job Satisfaction and Organisational Performance
THE EFFECT OF LEADERSHIP STYLE ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION AND PERFORMANCE OF BANK EMPLOYEES IN BANGKOK
Rochelle Joy Belonio1
Abstract: This paper aims to determine the effect of leadership styles on employee job satisfaction and the effect of employee job satisfaction on employee job performance. A survey was conducted by administering questionnaires to 400 respondents in the banking sector in Bangkok. The results show that most of the bank employees, most of them females between 20 and 39 years old, are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. They are ambivalent. Transformational leadership style was seen to have a positive effect on various facets of employee job satisfaction. Transactional leadership also turned out to be perceived as having a positive effect on different facets of employee job satisfaction. So did laissez-faire leadership. Employee job satisfaction was seen to have a positive effect on the various aspects of employee job performance analyzed. It was found that leaders and managers combine the various leadership styles identified in the research paper in proportions that produce a positive result when administering their leadership duties. The proportions at which these leadership styles are combined depend on the nature of the situation they encounter in the workplace. Keywords: Leadership, Transformational, Transactional, Laissez-faire, Satisfaction, Performance 1. Introduction Most firms and businesses consist of employers and employees or, put differently, management and staff or leaders and followers. Most of them are goal oriented. In order to achieve the desired objectives, there must be an interaction between employers and employees (or management and staff or leaders and followers). The leadership style that characterizes the interaction between leaders (or managers) and their followers (or staff members) is most important in terms of employees’ efficiency and productivity. Employees are the workforce of any businesses and they carry out the
Rochelle Joy Belonio1
Abstract: This paper aims to determine the effect of leadership styles on employee job satisfaction and the effect of employee job satisfaction on employee job performance. A survey was conducted by administering questionnaires to 400 respondents in the banking sector in Bangkok. The results show that most of the bank employees, most of them females between 20 and 39 years old, are neither satisfied nor dissatisfied. They are ambivalent. Transformational leadership style was seen to have a positive effect on various facets of employee job satisfaction. Transactional leadership also turned out to be perceived as having a positive effect on different facets of employee job satisfaction. So did laissez-faire leadership. Employee job satisfaction was seen to have a positive effect on the various aspects of employee job performance analyzed. It was found that leaders and managers combine the various leadership styles identified in the research paper in proportions that produce a positive result when administering their leadership duties. The proportions at which these leadership styles are combined depend on the nature of the situation they encounter in the workplace. Keywords: Leadership, Transformational, Transactional, Laissez-faire, Satisfaction, Performance 1. Introduction Most firms and businesses consist of employers and employees or, put differently, management and staff or leaders and followers. Most of them are goal oriented. In order to achieve the desired objectives, there must be an interaction between employers and employees (or management and staff or leaders and followers). The leadership style that characterizes the interaction between leaders (or managers) and their followers (or staff members) is most important in terms of employees’ efficiency and productivity. Employees are the workforce of any businesses and they carry out the
References: Allen, W.R., Drevs, R.A. & Ruhe, J.A. (1999). Reasons why college-educated women change employment. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol 14, No 1, P 77-93 Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational Dynamics; Organizational Dynamics. Elsevier Science Bass, B.M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol 8, No 1, P 9-32 Burns, J.M.G. (1979). Two Excerpts from" Leadership.". Educational Leadership, Vol 36, No 6, P 380-83 Chen, J.C. & Silverthorne, C. (2005). Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol 26, No 4, P 280-288 Dulewicz, V. & Higgs, M. (2003). Leadership at the top: The need for emotional intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,Vol 11, No 3, P 193-210 Eskildsen, J.K.& Nussler, M.L. (2000). The managerial drivers of employee satisfaction and loyalty. Total Quality Management, Vol 11,No 4-6, P 581-588 Fry, L.W. (2003).Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The leadership quarterly,Vol 14, No 6, P 693-727 Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R.E. & McKee, A.(2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. @ 157851486X: Harvard Business Press Herzberg, F.M. (1959). T B. & Snyderman, B. (1959). The Motivation to Work. Journal 2, li House, R.J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly, P 321-339 Jaskyte, K. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, Vol 15, No 2, P 153-168 Morris, A. & Bloom, J.R. (2002). Contextual factors affecting job satisfaction and organizational commitment in community mental health centers undergoing system changes in the financing of care. Mental health services research, Vol 4, No 2, P 7183 Northouse, P. (2004). G., 2004. Leadership Theory and Practice. Pastoral Psychology, Vol 56, No 4, P 403-411 Schyns, B. & Sanders, K. (2007). In the Eyes of the Beholder: Personality and the Perception of Leadership1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol 37, No 10, P 2345-2363 Spector, P.E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, cause, and consequences, Vol 3. Sage Publications, Inc Turner, J.R. & Müller, R. (2005). The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review. Project management journal, Vol 36, No 2, P 49-61 Yurchisin, J. & Park, J. (2010). Effects of Retail Store Image Attractiveness and Self-Evaluated Job Performance on Employee Retention. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol 25, No 3, P 441-450 Yukl, G.A. (1994). Leadership in Organization.Englewood Cliffs, New Jerseys：Prentice- Hall. 116