Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Economic Impact of The Contract with America

Better Essays
1139 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Economic Impact of The Contract with America
Michael Arce
11/24/2012
American Economic History
Reaction Paper
Prof Grill

The Economic Impact of the Contract with America

Much can be written about the political success and failures of the Contract With America. Proposed in dramatic fashion on the steps of the US Capitol by 367 candidates for office on September 27, 1994, Republican members of the House of Representatives organized themselves and aligned their ideals around ten parts, much like the Bill of Rights and the original Commandments. These ten sections were more than a legislative agenda for action; they were a plan and pledge that members vowed to be held accountable for the next 100 days of the 104th Congress and beyond.

The economic policies outlined in the Contract with America were not new ideas to conservatives in the Republican party. Since the days of FDR’s “New Deal” and LBJ’s “Great Society,” conservatives questioned the role of government in the lives of everyday citizens. After Senator Goldwater’s defeat in 1964 and President Reagan’s two terms in office, “conservatives learned two lessons about the role of the Presidency. On the one hand, the President can have a profound international impact through his policies, as reflected in the winning of the Cold War and, later the war in the Persian Gulf. On the other hand, in the most fundamental area of the size and scope of government activities, the President could lead, but a Congress controlled by the opposition did not have to follow.” (The Contract With America, J. Gayner) During the mid-term Election of 1994, conservatives saw the opportunity to take the House and hold President Clinton’s liberal economic policies at bay.

The Contract 's preamble says, "In this era of official evasion and posturing, we offer instead a detailed agenda for national renewal, a written commitment with no fine print." Under the Contract the Republicans committed themselves to introduce the following legislation within 100 days:

1) "Fiscal Responsibility Act": the balanced-budget amendment plus line-item veto power for the president.

2) "Taking Back Our Streets Act": measures expanding prison construction, increasing sentences, and reducing the possibility of appeal for death-sentence cases.

3) "Personal Responsibility Act": welfare reform.

4) "Family Reinforcement Act": diverse measures including tax incentives for adoption.

5) "American Dream Restoration Act": mainly a different form of tax-sheltered retirement account.

6) "National Security Restoration Act": defense measures, mainly limiting US participation in United Nations ventures.

7) "Senior Citizens Equity Act": expanded tax breaks for Social Security recipients.

8) "Job Creation and Wage Enhancement Act": mainly a 50 percent reduction in capital gains taxes.

9) "Common Sense Legal Reforms Act": assorted changes intended to reduce excess litigation.

10) "Citizen Legislature Act": term limits for representatives and senators.

What was quite impressive was that nine of the ten items in the Contract passed the House: Only the constitutional amendment on term limits (which required a two-thirds vote) was defeated. “Within two years, however, the Republican ascendancy and Contract with America was in a shambles.” (American President: A Reference Resource, Mills) The rise of President Clinton’s popularity after his 1996 re-election over Bob Dole left many asking, “what happened?” Some say it was because the conservatives went too far in trying to use the Contract as a governing plan that a majority of voters didn’t endorse. The economy was in a much more productive state in 1996 than when Clinton ran for office in 1992, some suggest that consumer confidence was back and that “good times” were ahead for America.

The problem could be more with the Contract itself than the party that passed it. Out of the 10 sections, less than half directly addressed economic policy. “A principled conservative fiscal program would start by pointing out that over the next six years, federal budget deficits will total about one trillion dollars…. Presumably the Republicans don 't agree--if they did, why would their Contract include the Balanced Budget Amendment? Yet their contract gives no indication of where even a small share of the trillion dollars necessary to close the gap might come from.” (Washington and The Contract With America, J. Fallows)

On the entitlement issues of great importance at the time of the 1996 Election: Social Security, Welfare, and Medicare/Medicaid, “the Contract, amazingly, contains not a single word about controlling medical costs, by far the fastest-rising category in federal and state spending. Its welfare reform package includes a limit on spending for today 's main welfare programs. But these represent only about 1 percent of the entire federal budget, and the Contract 's welfare package as a whole would probably increase welfare costs.” (Washington and The Contract With America, J. Fallows) It would appear that these “Acts” were intended to refocus attention on personal responsibility and away from the federal government as the source of solving Citizens problems.

What hurt conservatives were not their ideas but their strict discipline of unwillingness to compromise with the President, putting their ideas ahead of what the majority of Americans wanted. Unfortunately for Republicans, they did not remember the lesson of President Reagan, who worked with the Democratic opposition he faced in the House. The new conservatives in 1995 gambled that they could force a Democratic President to accept their plan with public opinion and support - and Republicans lost. President Clinton, “sensing the opportunity to show his mettle, vetoed Republican-passed spending bills in the fall of 1995, citing proposed cuts in education and Medicaid as being unfair. The U.S. government closed its doors twice, first for six days in November and again for twenty-one days in December 1995. Three-quarters of a million federal workers were caught in the middle of this political jousting just before Christmas, left to wonder whether they would be paid during the holiday season. Angry Americans, faced with locked government offices and closed national parks, blamed the Republicans, forcing them to back down and pass a temporary measure to reopen the government on January 5, 1996. Voters who had once urged the Republicans onward in their attacks on big government now applauded Clinton for protecting their interests.” (American President: A Reference Resource, Mills Center)

Overall, the goal of the Contract with America was to attempt to reverse the increasing debt, role, and size of the federal government in the American economy. The ideas helped fuel the debate on re-examining the role of government and monitoring the Country’s debt. Never before has such a detailed document been such an important part of an election, or movement in a political party. While the Contract didn’t ensure a complete victory for Republicans in 1996, it did lay the fundamentals for the rise of Conservatism in 2000 and beyond.

WORKS CITED
“The Contract With America: Implementing New Ideas in the U.S.”
Jeffrey B. Gayner, 1995 The Heritage Foundation

“Washington and The Contract With America”
James Fallows, The Atlantic Online http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/jfnpr/jfreview.htm "American President: A Reference Resource" The Mills Center, Republican Contract with America http://millercenter.org/president/clinton/essays/biography/3

Cited: “The Contract With America: Implementing New Ideas in the U.S.” Jeffrey B. Gayner, 1995 The Heritage Foundation “Washington and The Contract With America” James Fallows, The Atlantic Online http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/jfnpr/jfreview.htm "American President: A Reference Resource" The Mills Center, Republican Contract with America http://millercenter.org/president/clinton/essays/biography/3

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Reagan was particularly beleaguered when unemployment rose to a staggering 9.5%. He dreaded that he would not be re-elected. Presidents Reagan’s goal was to execute economic policy dubbed ‘Reaganomics’. This policy aimed at stimulating America’s economy through tax credits, accelerated depreciation, and tax cuts. Reagan’s core catalyst to attain this goal was the enactment of the ERTA (Economic recovery Tax Act) in 1981. The ERTA brought in phased-in cuts in marginal duty levels that were extensive. ERTA, however, was a too far bridge and failed despondently creating huge budget deficits as well as weakening America’s economy. This resulted in an economic slump that lasted through the better part of 1982. Luckily, Reagan saw the fault, and with enactment of TEFRA (Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act) in late 1982. America’s economy embarked on a path to recovery. TEFRA acted as ERTA’s remedy. In fact, it came to be known as the most extensive peacetime tax rise to be ever enacted in the history of America. Ironically, Reagan, a Republican, had signed the bill. TEFRA began presumably the most considerable bull series in the economic history of America. This cycle lasted for close to half a decade. Reagan deserves much of the credit for endorsing TEFRA and particularly, for its great economic outcome. However, few people recognize that it was Peter Stark, a Democrat, who backed TEFRA. Worth noting is the fact that Reagan played a very instrumental role by joining forces with fellow Democrats. The TEFRA perhaps explains why Reagan was reelected for a second…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the only President to preside over an American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln entered the office of the presidency with mounting challenges ahead of him. The country’s overwhelming divide regarding the issue of slavery proved to be the central issue in the 1861 elections. President Lincoln’s strong resolve to reunite the union catalyzed a sharp shift in his beliefs regarding the weight of power in the executive branch, helping Lincoln strengthen the office of the Presidency like never before. This set a precedent for future Presidents, notably Theodore Roosevelt, whose legislation on big business and “speak softly and carry a big stick” methodology to foreign relations, while thoroughly of his own design, most certainly finds its roots in the empowered President Lincoln.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1984 presidential election of Ronald Reagan brought upon numerous exceptional and dubious policies to the U.S. economy. A considerable lot of these approaches, including Reaganomics still influence our economy in general and are still significant points of open deliberations today.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise between the President and Congress,and debates are things that define American democracy in the 21st century. America's political landscape would seem foreign without the fighting of the party not in power, or the role that every person plays in electing public candidates. As odd as it may seem, our democracy did not always pursue the vote of the common man, or even have two battling political parties. These aspects of American democracy can be traced back to changes that occurred between 1820 and 1840. Jacksonian Economic Policy and Changes in Electoral Politics advanced the development of democracy between 1820 and 1840.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reagan vs Obama

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before Regan took office in 1981, the state of the United States economy was in dismal shape. The high unemployment of mid 1970’s seemed to be on the way down, but because of an unnaturally low Federal Reserve’s interest rate, inflation was out of control. By the time Reagan got into office, the unemployment rate in the country had increased from a low of 5.8% to 7.6% in 1981. Although the country was experiencing an increasing unemployment rate, the inflation rate was skyrocketing above 14% for multiple months in 1980. The Federal Reserve had to increase interest rates in order to control the value of the dollar, at the cost of millions of jobs. Although the inflation rate decreased from an average of 13.58% in 1980 to 3.22% in 1983, the unemployment rate rose from the higher interest rate from 7.1% in 1980 to 9.7% in 1982. This huge increase in the amount of unemployed naturally caused a sharp decline in Reagan’s approval ratings. In 1984, Reagan’s election year, the economy began crawling back. Unemployment dropped from 9.7% in 1982 to 7.5% in 1984 and American’s began to believe in Reagan’s ability to help the economy thrive. Reagan’s economic success is credited to the tax cuts he enacted. During the 1970’s the federal tax rate for wealthy making over $200,000 a year was at or over 70% for the entire decade. Reagan’s cuts lowered the amount of taxable income from 70% (for the highest earners) to 50% in 1982. This increase in money allowed the wealthy to invest more and hire more workers, leading to the recovery that began in 1984.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "American President: A Reference Resource." Miller Center. University of Virginia. Web. 30 Oct 2012. .…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq apush

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    OVERVIEW OF THE TIME SPAN: This unit deals with the years immediately following the American Revolution. We will examine the early or “Critical Period” of the new nation as it moved from being a loosely bound group of states to a more solid union of states under the new Constitution. During this period problems in foreign and domestic affairs were dealt with by the fledgling government.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roark, James L. The American Promise: A History of the United States. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2008. Print.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Columbus vs. Hitler

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Some may say that history has a tendency to repeat itself. From episodes regarding war, to expansionism, and incidents of genocide similar examples are present through modern day. While this phenomenon never ceases to replicate the past, there are always enough subtle nuances of change that prevent history from repeating itself exactly as before. At a time when European expansionism was begging to take shape war and genocide were prevalent. When Columbus set sail for Asia with the intent of establishing a trade monopoly between the vibrant culture of Asia and Spain and discovered the New World, along with it came the discovery of the Indians and a new trade and labor opportunity began to take place. Columbus' discovery of the New World has been controversial. There are those who wish to honor him and therefore feel that the accusations concerning his crime of genocide are revisions of history. Blinded by greed Columbus turned into a vicious tyrant hungry for only gaining wealth and status. However, there are sources that describe the atrocities Columbus and the Spaniards committed against the Indians. These brutalities are all part of a bigger picture of genocide committed by Columbus when he discovered the New World. Many of the tribulations done are similar to those performed by the Nazis in World War II. Hitler's "Final Solution to the Jewish Problem" attempted to be solved through a mass genocide we know as the Holocaust. Some people would argue that Columbus "conquests" and "Hitler's Final Solution to the Jewish Problem" are comparable. These people look at the atrocities that both parties committed against their victims and the amount of people who died. Although the methods and intent were different, the slavery and subjugation of the Indians and the Jews as compared through the two men Columbus and Hitler and had an affect on our modern world.…

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “A little more persistence, a little more effort, and what seemed hopeless failure may turn to glorious success” (Elbert Hubbard). The New Deal that was proposed by Franklin D. Roosevelt was the persistence and effort that provided hope for americans that the hopeless failures of Herbert Hoover could possibly end. Franklin D. Roosevelt became president in 1933 after he had won the election of 1932 against former president, Herbert Hoover. In the year 1933, America was in a state of economic depression mainly, but not solely, because of the 1929 stock market crash. After this crash, over $30 billion was just lost; it had vanished into thin air. President Roosevelt is the man who came into office and attempted to put America back together and get the country out of the depression. The lasting effects of The New Deal on American history are the trust that the people had in their government, the support the government provided for Americans, and the hope Americans had that the depression would expire.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 20, 1981, newly elected President Ronald Reagan addressed the issue of economic affliction of great proportions in the United States. He described the situation as one of the worst sustained inflations in the history of the country. According to Reagan, this happened as a result of frequent public spending, with no regard for the future. Thus, tremendous social, cultural, political, and economic upheavals were to come. To fix this, Reagan proposed that they must begin acting as soon as possible. His main philosophy was that government itself was the problem, and it was hindering the progress of citizens across the country. As a result, he made it the administration’s objective to create a healthy, growing economy that provided equal…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The New Deal created many short term and long term effects in the United States. One short term effect is that people feared poverty. Most people in today's society do not have to worry about poverty as bad as they did when the Great Depression hit. Another short term effect from the New Deal is people thought that money was the most import thing in the world. Today, most people think that their family is the most import thing, even though money is still a high ranking priority. Some long term effects of the New Deal is the Social Security system, the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission. These programs made by FDR are still effective today and continue to help…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech Roosevelt stated that “if the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the marketplace” (Roosevelt n.d.). The government should promote justice, equality and stability inspiring much confidence on the part of the American citizens. Roosevelt saw the government as freedom’s ally compared to the previous presidency when the government was freedom’s enemy causing economic inequality. Roosevelt claimed that many government leaders forgot “what the Flag and the Constitution stand for, stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule” (Roosevelt n.d.). The New Deal resulted in a new role for the federal government supporting individuals financially and promoting economic stability in the country. Roosevelt saw economic security as a political condition of personal freedom, as “the New Deal reduced individual liberty for the sake of increasing economic security” (Cohen 171). Thus, the New Deal benefited the country and people living there changing the role of the government in the country’s economy and other…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harry L. Watson’s book, “Liberty and Power, The Politics of Jacksonian America”, takes an analytical look at America and her politics during the Age of Jackson. Watson uses the economy and the ideological mindset of the people, to support a powerful argument about the beginning of American political parties and their importance in defining the political direction of the country. Watson argues that economic inequalities caused by the “Market Revolution” and a threat to American liberty caused Americans to organize politically in support of a President that would put the interest of the majority first. The results would be pivotal in American politics and shape how elections were conducted to this day.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conservatism Movement

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    From the mid 1940s to the early 2000s, the conservative movement was at its apex in United States history. The Rise of Conservatism in America, 1945-2000: A Brief History with Documents by Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie contains documents all pertaining to the conservative movement. Out of the collection of the various documents in The Rise of Conservatism, five stand out to be the most important in detailing what the conservative moment was and what the basic beliefs and goals were. The documents are as follows: From The Conservative Mind by Russell Kirk, From the Conscience of a Conservative by Barry Goldwater, William F. Buckley Jr. publisher’s statement on his founding the National Review, Richard Nixon’s Labor Day Radio Address, and Ronald Reagan’s nomination acceptance speech.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays