Preview

The Doctrine of the Mean

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Doctrine of the Mean
The doctrine of the mean states that for someone to be a good person they must occupy the “golden mean,” meaning a person may become virtuous by acting between the extremes of excess and deficiency. For example during war, the two extremes would be for a soldier to be rash or cowardly, but being courageous is the accepted golden mean. According to Aristotle, virtue lies in between the two extremes, which are the vices, and thus a virtuous person is one who can find the mean that is relative to his or her situation: that is the mean changes depending on the circumstances surrounding each decision. Using the previous example, a priest would never be expected to take up arms in battle, an act that would be considered cowardly in other situations. The priest, however, would not be viewed as a coward because of his beliefs and personal situation: for him the virtuous mean is to not take sides in conflict but instead to remain faithful in helping all people regardless in their position. The mean is a formula by which a person may act virtuously. There is not one right choice for every person in every situation, but rather there is one virtuous action for every situation, which is relative to each person and the surrounding circumstances. The mean between the two vices is not an absolute average: rather it is flexible and can vary with each individual.
I believe that the doctrine of the mean is true, because every situation can present choices that can be deemed virtuous or not. Difficultly comes in determining the virtuous action and acting upon it. Finding the virtue takes practice and comes from learning through personal actions and habits and those of other people. Once we behave in a manner considered right, due to a good upbringing and a good constitution, being virtuous will follow. The doctrine of the mean is true, but how you apply it and act on it can pose difficulty. This difficultly is not necessarily a flaw of the doctrine, nor does it negate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virtue is finding that middle ground between two extremes. Each virtue has two opposites, for example: modesty is the mean between shyness and shamelessness, shyness being the excess and shamelessness being the deficiency. To me this sounds like Aristotle is mainly concerned with the mean as its aim. However, the mean of one person may be a different mean for another since every individual is different. He gives a good example of this in (1106b) where he speaks about deciding on portions of food, the specific needs of each person needs to be taken into account. An athlete would need to eat more food than your everyday man. When it comes to deciding what is virtuous one needs to find a mean that is specific to one self. The mean should lie between the two extremes of vice: excess and deficiency. What Aristotle means by excess is going beyond what is appropriate in terms of feelings and in actions. On the other hand deficiency falls short of what is appropriate. The mean that we search for is a cross between the two vices and is found in a trial and error like process through the experiences of one’s own life. Aristotle also refers to virtue as an active condition. What I believe…

    • 657 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Response To The Meno

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Is virtue something that can be taught? Or does it come by practice? Or is it neither teaching…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle defines virtue as a disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean between extremes of deficiency and excess. However, there is no fixed rule to determine where the mean lies. We can look at one of the virtue related to money as a way to determine the mean. According to Aristotle, in giving and taking money the mean is generosity, the excess wastefulness and the deficiency ungenerosity. Virtue is acquired primarily through habit and practice rather than through reasoning and instructions. Aristotle’s conception of virtue as something learned through habit rather than through reasoning makes a great deal of practical sense because it is difficult to make an unpleasant person pleasant simply by providing reasons for behaving more pleasantly. We can only be good at something through constant practice then and only then can we appreciate what it is that we are good at. Ultimately for an action to be virtuous, whether we are giving away money or being courageous, a person must do it deliberately, knowing what he is doing, and doing it because it is a noble action.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    C. in Athens, Greece, it focuses primarily on personal character and the development of certain virtuous character traits. To act well in various circumstances by doing the right thing is the center focus of a person’s character traits as in their self-control, courage, wisdom, honesty and respect that makes the person what they are over time. This life of a virtuously ethical person emphasizes achieving human excellence by always doing the right thing, the mere meaning of virtue from both the Latin and Greek culture means “excellence”, to be a model citizen and is founded on the assumption that the purpose of life was to achieve happiness and fulfillment. Aristotle though, has the most prolific virtue ethics theory, he held that understanding the meaning of a virtue was necessary but not sufficient to make one virtuous and that there are many specific virtues: intellectual, and moral, whereas moral virtues are those we would need in order to conduct affairs in daily life such as self-control, courage, gentleness and wittiness. Intellectual virtue reflects what is unique and important about human nature, human reasoning and rationality, calmness, wisdom and knowledge to name a few. Virtue ethics is the embodiment of being all you can be by making the most of our talents and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    pg. 733, para 2: Virtue (doing right) is the most obvious connection between morality and…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Nicomachean Ethics,” Aristotle defines moral virtue as a disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean between extremes of deficiency and excess, which are vices. Moral virtue is learned through habit and practice rather than through reasoning and instruction. Virtue is defined as having the proper attitude toward pain and pleasure. Aristotle lists the principle virtues along with their corresponding vices and believes that a virtuous person exhibits all of the virtues, not as distinct qualities but as different aspects of a virtuous…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allegory of the Cave 12

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When a person is not virtuous they won't make decisions based upon what is ethically right. Without morals and values guiding them their decisions will be self centered for personal gain and results. Say that a legislator wanted a law that benefited his interests directly. He could utilize his power to have a law drafted and passed. Acting without virtue, he still is gaining from his position in the State where his selfishness may cause the rest of the citizens harm. That very legislator would cause “civil and domestic broils.”…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nazi Prisoner Doctors

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the hospital the mean between not helping anyone and helping no one would be to help the ones you can. Even if at times you were required to kill some for the greater good I think that would still be the mean.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One important effect of virtue is illustrated through kindliness. Jesus was a great example of kindliness. He would hang out with the lowly and sick when nobody else would even if people criticized Him for it. Kindliness is normally the first effect of virtue developed because it has been engrained in our minds since our first years, yet it still can be a struggle to become kind. “Kindliness forbids you to be over-bearing towards your associates, and it forbids you to be grasping” (Seneca 4). Seneca is saying that kindliness is putting someone else’s interest in front of one’s own interest. Even though kindliness is a simple concept, it is often hard for people because selfishness is an epidemic in the world today. “In words and in deeds and in feelings it [Kindliness] shows itself gentle and courteous to all men.” Kindliness isn’t just being kind in actions or words, but also being calm and genuine in one’s thoughts. Even during difficult and enraging situations; kindliness…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Exam

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Directions: Your exams must be submitted through SafeAssign on Blackboard. Late submissions will be penalized 10 points (one full letter grade) and I will not accept submissions after one week past the due date, which will result in a 0 for the assignment. Plagiarism merits automatic failure for the course.…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epictetus Imperfection

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Aristotle’s Book 2 of Nicomachean Ethics, he deals with virtue, but more importantly, its golden mean "the measurement that which the virtue is secreted neither in excess nor in deficiency. For example, endurance is a mean between its deficiency of rashness and the excess of cowardice. This argument seems to be certain, as it seems that moderation to everything is a necessity.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justify the Means

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does “The end Justify the means”. In the movie, Mississippi Burning, the end justifies the means in a way because when you think about it most of the time there are certain limitations to getting what you want. In the movie the only way to get the Ku Klux Klan to confess and give each other to the police was to trick them and make them think that the Ku Klux Klan was after them. In other occasions around the world at the time it was not always necessary to hurt or kill people just to get what you want. Even though it was not necessary people still did it even though they did not have to (they wanted to). In the Mississippi burning the white people might have thought they had a right to hurt/kill Negro people just because they were scared of them and thought they were better then them. That is still no good reason. Proof of the white people hurt the Negroes and damaging their land, crops, and livestock is at the beginning of the movie as the credits where going across the screen there was a Negro church burning in the background. Throughout the movie we see that the “White Knights” are burning down Negro’s homes and barns along with the livestock inside them. All this evidence shows the brutality in Mississippi at that time. There was no reason to kill the three young activists. Especially not the reason that the Ku Klux Klan had (one man was a Negro). Even though the Ku Klux Klan did not have a good reason to do what they did the Federal Bureau of Investigation should still not have done what they did. The end was right but the means were wrong. The Federal Bureau of Investigation should have done what they had been doing but they should have tried a little harder to find someone that would speak to them so they could get the rest of the names. They could have also done what they did and get the weakest link to tell just by interrogation rather than what they had did and scared him and his family so bad the he would do anything…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right Thing Theory

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My personal views coincide with those of the author for this week’s essay prompt, who praises the practicality of Locke’s theories while renouncing the overtly idealistic ones of Rousseau. I agree with the author’s analysis that Locke’s theory holds more merit and is more persuasive than Rousseau’s. The author of the excerpt makes a compelling argument that Rousseau’s theory of human nature is naive and not applicable to reality. Rousseau's theories are inapplicable to reality because they are far too idealistic and fail to acknowledge the self-interested aspect of human nature. The argument from the essay prompt is a strong analysis of the philosophers because it effectively uses a personal anecdote to support Locke’s theory that a desire…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The view I believe to be most correct is Character Ethics. This view point doesn’t focus on individual actions, it focuses on what kind of person those actions create. It also asks, what character traits make a good person. At the heart of this system of ethics are the virtues, a disposition of having the right feeling. These disposition follows the doctrine of the mean; the amount virtuous attitudes are dependent on the individual i.e. what is courageous is different for a firefighter compared to an elderly lady.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Virtue Ethics

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle was one of the founders of the theory of virtue. He thought that a virtuous person is someone who has ideal character traits.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics