Preview

The Differences between House of Lords and the House of Commons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
506 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Differences between House of Lords and the House of Commons
Compare and contrast the differences of the House of Lords and the House of Commons
There are many differences between the House of Commons and the House of Lords however these can be separated into the main issues of Legislation and Legitimating. In the UK all legislation has to be approved by the Commons who have the final say on all Bills. This is effectively giving the consent of the people to those laws that they are expected to obey. Without this consent, laws would lack authority. It is purely because of this that the Lords are not given more powers. Although legislation and Government policies must be presented to the Lords it does not act on behalf of the people and so is only given the powers to suggest amendments to Bills (with the exception of money bills of which they have no powers to scrutinise) or to delay legislation for up to a year. Indeed legislation has a very important part in both Houses of Parliament. 21st September 2005 Distinguish between the different functions of the House of Lords and House of Commons Both the House of Lords and House of Commons carry out many functions in Parliament. Each function plays a vital role, which all interconnect with each other. These differences help parliament in a chain of events. Only the House of Commons is allowed to make bills, these don't have to be made by the government. Bills are introduced by an individual MP, known as a Private Members' Bill, also, the House of Commons takes a free vote on a particular issue. It is not expected that the Commons should defeat or challenge legislation proposed by the Government, especially if the Government has a mandate.
However the Government can be warned that proposed laws may be unpopular. The Commons may also amend legislation according to errors or discrimination against minorities. Amendments to legislation are also common in the House of Lords as this is their primary power against any laws that they might disagree with. Nevertheless this may only be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    On the other hand some of the rules and regulations that the House of Lords have are similar to the stages of the commons. After the bill has been completed all its stages in the commons, changes to the bill in the house of the lords will require an extra stage in the commons called, lords amendments considered. Therefore implementing the ban will offer the vote to disprove or approve of any alterations made by the lords. In…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The most important source of English Law is Legislation; it is implemented by the queen in Parliament I.e. the House of Commons, the House of lord and the Monarch. As part of the UK elections, citizens permitted to vote will elect an association to represent the House of Commons. On the other hand the House of Lords are not elected members and do not represent. At present majority of the Lords are selected by the Monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister; however the House of Lords Appointments Commission assists with the vetting nominations.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Unit 23

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before any law and acts are made, there is a long procedure in the process of it being passed. If there are new laws it usually is chosen by majority decision usually in courts or the parliament. For example, the executive or the government form laws in the House of Commons by setting out bills. Sometimes it may come from their election mandate in order to be chosen, for example recently how labour vowed to ban fox hunting which can be shown as an example. Moreover, they then set out a bill to become an act which gets passed to the house and then to the House of Lords as a checking procedure before it is made. However, if the House of Lords don’t pass it as a law then the executive can go and make it an act. This specific method shows that it can be done by the government and has a process for it before anything can be done; usually these acts and laws come out during elections in order to win voters and sometimes are done and even not processed.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main role of parliament is to introduce, debate and put into practice laws that are for the greater good of society. Law making is not a sub-role or something that parliament focuses only a small amount of its attention on it is the sole purpose of its existence. To have a national organisation the size and strength of parliament that focuses solely on law making is one of its main strengths as a law making institution. However parliament is not always sitting and it could be said that this causes a delay in parliament’s ability to react to issues that require changes to the law. If there was a law that it became clear required urgent attention parliament may have to wait a number of weeks for a scheduled sitting date before this issue could be discussed and any changes to the law be made. Parliament is elected by the people and is consequently responsible to the voting public; this is strength of it as a law making institution.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When debating MPs are able to express their views to influence policy in the debates on current events and actions. Every proposed piece of legislation must be debated at least twice, this is good as the policies may need amendments applied to them, or they may just be policies that would not be in the interest of most of the country. The MPs are able to subject bills to scrutiny, especially if they have a major impact on their constituency; this is to their advantage, as the policies may not go into action and completely discarded. The ministers are forced to present all policies to the House of Commons before any public announcements are to be made.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number of effective bills passed also depends on the governments agenda and not on the will of parliament as it is the executive that draws up the Parliamentary timetable, meaning that most issues discussed will be those which the government and not the Commons wishes to discuss as very little legislation is initiated by backbench MPs not in the government. When legislation suggested by backbenchers, Private Members Bills, are proposed they are largely ineffective without government backing. However, although Parliament might not initiate a large amount of bills, it can persuade and influence the executive through active discussions.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Most legislation originates in the Commons. The House of Lords may take a part in shaping legislation, but it cannot permanently block a bill passed by the Commons, and it has no authority over money bills. The crown need not assent to all legislation, but assent has not been withheld since 1707.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ww1 and Ww2

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Congress and Parliament both have a bicameral legislature or a two-house legislature. Parliament’s two houses are the Lords and the House of Commons. Members of the House of Commons are publically elected by the people of England. Currently, the House of Commons has 1,100 members. Their primary responsibility is to propose new laws, yet they also deal with financial bills such as creating a new dollar. The Lords are mostly appointed representatives chosen by Parliament. They currently have 830 members. Their responsibilities are too make laws, investigate policy issues, and often compliment the works of the House of Commons. Similarly, Congress’ houses are the Senate and the House of Representatives. These parties are both voted in by constituents or people of the United States. The Senate is often known as the “upper” house of congress while the House of Representatives is often known as the “lower” house. Both houses of Congress can propose new laws and vote on them. The overall main difference is that the Senate controls all of the Presidents meetings and appointments, and they can decide the future of a bill. The Senate is home to 100 members of Congress, while the House of Representatives is home to 435 members of Congress.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are slight differences in both houses, even being down to how long each terms are within each house with the House being 2 years and the Senate being three times this with 6 years for a term. The fact of the House term being so short before the next election it almost forces the members to focus and get what is needed for their constituency. Especially as if nothing productive is done within the two years of their election it could be that they are not voted in again. ___ example Dole ? This means that within their term, members need to do as much as they can do to do what’s in their constituency’s best interest.…

    • 652 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a multitude of differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate. Generally, the House of Representatives defines rules through committees, and the Senate’s rules are extremely archaic. The senate is unique legislative body due to the rules that define how debate takes place on the floor. In fact, modern day senators can hold up debate simply by saying they wish to filibuster; they are no longer must stand and talk for hours on end. The House, on the other hand, has a specified Rules Committee and forbids extended debate on legislation on the floor.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PESTLE Analysis of UK

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages

    The UK adheres to a democratic, parliamentary system of governance known as the Westminster system. This system…

    • 22108 Words
    • 144 Pages
    Powerful Essays