The Defense of Marriage Act
Citations: http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/federal-legislation/respect-for-marriage-act?gclid=CPKnzqXWwrYCFRFt6wodCi8AEA - This site profoundly represents what the DOMA act truly stands for and represents by stating that legally married couples of the same sex do not have the same marital rights that a man and a woman would have. http://www.glaad.org/resources/doma - This site states when the law was represented and the then president who passed it into law (Bill Clinton) and also it’s sole purpose. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/28/raw-politics-explains-why-doma-got-wide-support-in-1996/ - This site states how and why the DOMA act got so much support to be passed in 1996. http://theweek.com/article/index/240945/4-signs-that-doma-is-doomed - States that same sex marriage cannot receive the same federal benefits as other couples. http://www.policymic.com/articles/30069/doma-10-billion-waste-threatens-conservative-movement-s-survival - The law thoroughly states how conservative republicans thought that by passing this law they’d gain univeral American support to help them in elections. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/waymon-hudson/over-70-major-companies-f_b_1080485.html - This website displays the companies that are against the DOMA act.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a law that was formed in 1996 by Congress, and was signed into law by then president Bill Clinton sought to be enforced by the Supreme Court that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Traditionally, marriage is defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman at the pinnacle of their life’s down until their final years. And the purpose of DOMA is to protect that sense of unionship in the United States and rather preserve it than destroy it. DOMA is a tricky subject. What I would like to learn about this subject is who backs this clause with full support and effort and who is absolutely against it. Although, as I’ve researched and
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a law that was formed in 1996 by Congress, and was signed into law by then president Bill Clinton sought to be enforced by the Supreme Court that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Traditionally, marriage is defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman at the pinnacle of their life’s down until their final years. And the purpose of DOMA is to protect that sense of unionship in the United States and rather preserve it than destroy it. DOMA is a tricky subject. What I would like to learn about this subject is who backs this clause with full support and effort and who is absolutely against it. Although, as I’ve researched and
Citations: http://www.hrc.org/laws-and-legislation/federal-legislation/respect-for-marriage-act?gclid=CPKnzqXWwrYCFRFt6wodCi8AEA - This site profoundly represents what the DOMA act truly stands for and represents by stating that legally married couples of the same sex do not have the same marital rights that a man and a woman would have. http://www.glaad.org/resources/doma - This site states when the law was represented and the then president who passed it into law (Bill Clinton) and also it’s sole purpose. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/03/28/raw-politics-explains-why-doma-got-wide-support-in-1996/ - This site states how and why the DOMA act got so much support to be passed in 1996. http://theweek.com/article/index/240945/4-signs-that-doma-is-doomed - States that same sex marriage cannot receive the same federal benefits as other couples. http://www.policymic.com/articles/30069/doma-10-billion-waste-threatens-conservative-movement-s-survival - The law thoroughly states how conservative republicans thought that by passing this law they’d gain univeral American support to help them in elections. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/waymon-hudson/over-70-major-companies-f_b_1080485.html - This website displays the companies that are against the DOMA act. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is a law that was formed in 1996 by Congress, and was signed into law by then president Bill Clinton sought to be enforced by the Supreme Court that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman. Traditionally, marriage is defined as a lifelong union between a man and a woman at the pinnacle of their life’s down until their final years. And the purpose of DOMA is to protect that sense of unionship in the United States and rather preserve it than destroy it. DOMA is a tricky subject. What I would like to learn about this subject is who backs this clause with full support and effort and who is absolutely against it. Although, as I’ve researched and read about this topic I’ve learned that DOMA is against gay-marriage so almost naturally I know that american homosexuals would be against this, but it would serve me well to learn about and delve further into if any politicans or important figures who’re against this as well as that demographic of people. I personally do not agree with the DOMA act because I believe that, whatever your sexual orientation may be that you should be able to marry and it should not be limited to just a union between a man and a woman. The final ruling for DOMA is not to be made until June of this year, one of the more recent Supreme Court cases that dealt with DOMA was Pedersen v. Office of Personal Management. When passed in 1996, the bill contained the following guidelines restricting same sex married couples from being able to do the following: 1. File their taxes jointly 2.Take unpaid leave to care for their spouse 3.Receive spousal benefits under Social Security 4. Receive equal family health and pension benefits as federal civilian employees. Along with DOMA being against same-sex rights, the Respect for Marriage Act (RMA) is for respecting the benefits of all married couples including same-sex married couples such as making those particular couples eligible for federal benefits and security those being family and medical leave, or Social Security spousal leave and survivor benefits although it cannot support grants at the state level. RMA as a bill was introduced to Congress by Representative Jerry Nadler and in the Senate by Senator Dianne Feinstein on March 16, 2011 and the verification of its legitimacy on November 10, 2011. There are over 70 companies that are against DOMA, some include corporations like Starbucks, Nike, Levi Strauss, Google, and many others of the like. The Arkansas House Committee along with the majority of the Republican political party are support the DOMA act.