Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The decision to drop the atomic bomb

Better Essays
1235 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The decision to drop the atomic bomb
Midterm Essay

In the summer of 1945 the United States was entering the final stages of World War II. One could assume that ending the war quickly was a priority. President Truman was demanding “unconditional surrender” from Japan. In a statement he released on May 8th, he described unconditional surrender as “Our blows will not cease until the Japanese military and naval forces lay down their arms in unconditional surrender. Just what does the unconditional surrender of the armed forces mean for the Japanese people? It means the end of the war. It means the termination of the influence of the military leaders who have brought Japan to the present brink of disaster.… Unconditional surrender does not mean the extermination or enslavement of the Japanese people. (Alperovitz, Gar (2010-12-29). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (p. 39).)” So if the war were to end the Japanese would have to unconditionally surrender, secretary of state James Byrnes said as much, “For instance, in his 1947 book Speaking Frankly, James F. Byrnes declared without qualification: “Had the Japanese Government listened to [Ambassador to Soviet Union] Sato and surrendered unconditionally, it would not have been necessary to drop the atomic bomb. (Alperovitz, p. 34)” The Japanese refused to surrender because of the terms they would be conceding to. They wanted a guarantee that their emperor would be protected and they felt unconditional surrender would put him in jeopardy. “The reality is that as the summer of 1945 progressed, most U.S. leaders fully realized that the only serious condition Japan’s leaders sought was an assurance that the Emperor would not be eliminated. (Alperovitz, p.34)” One could conclude that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan’s refusal to unconditionally surrender. There is also belief that the atomic bomb was dropped to intimidate the Soviet Union. As historian Barton Berstein put it, “The combat use of the bomb might greatly impress the Soviets and make them more tractable in the postwar period. (Alperovitz, p. 266)” President Truman seemed to want to flex the United States power for the world to see. “Not only had the weapon given American leaders “an entirely new feeling of confidence” during the Potsdam negotiations, but the very day Nagasaki was destroyed (August 9) President Truman declared of Rumania, Bulgaria, and Hungary that “These nations are not to be spheres of influence of any one power. (Alperovitz, p. 266)” Although some would later contradict their opinions, at the time of the atomic bombings many military leaders were in opposition of it’s usage. They did not deem the nuclear weapon to be a military necessity and believed there were other methods to end the war. Fleet Admiral William Leahy called the atomic bomb barbarous (Alperovitz, p. 326). U.S. Fleet and chief of Naval Operations, Ernest J. King, felt it was unnessacry and that they should have waited for the naval blockade (Alperovitz, p.327). “In short, at the very top of the U.S. navy—among those with access to the best information—it is difficult to find a knowledgeable World War II officer who is on record as supporting the idea that use of the atomic bomb was militarily required. (Alperovitz, p. 332)” Leaders in the Air Force were also in opposition of this deadly and destructive weapon. The commanding general of the U.S. Army Air Forces, Henry Arnold, felt that the dropping of the atomic bomb was unnecessary as well and that the decision was more of a political one (Alperovitz, p. 335). Major General Curtis LeMay believed the atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war and that it would have been over in two weeks (Alperovitz, p.336). “After the war, LeMay became one of the nation’s leading proponents of nuclear deterrence as commander of the U.S. Strategic Air Command (SAC) (Alperovitz, p. 338).” Army leaders were also under the belief that the atomic bomb was not a military necessity. General Douglas MacArthur told Former President Richard Nixon that the atomic bombings were a tragedy, and that the only targets should be military not civilians (Alperovitz, p.352). General Dwight Eisenhower had hoped they would never have to use the atomic bomb, he didn't like the thought of the U.S. introducing something so horrible and destructive (Alperovitz, p.353). The people that were in favor of dropping the atomic bomb seem to be much fewer the those who opposed it. President Truman and his secretary of state, James Byrnes were major players behind the decision to drop the atomic bomb. President Truman’s reasoning behind the dropping of the atomic bomb was that it had to be used to avoid an invasion. “The other major figures involved range from the ailing and aging secretary of war, Henry L. Stimson, to the tough-minded, aggressive general in charge of the Manhattan Project, Leslie R. Groves; and they include a host of lesser military and other officials (Alperovitz, p.13).” It seems as though James Byrnes was the most influential on advice to drop the atomic bomb and convincing the president to reject available alternatives (Alperovitz, p.13). Ethically, I don’t believe it was a wise long-range decision. There is ample evidence that the war was close to ending and that there were other methods of achieving the desired outcome. The atomic bomb was too destructive and took the lives of women and children. Admiral William Leahy compared our ethical standards to that of barbarians, “My own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children. (Alperovitz, p. 3).” As far as diplomacy and politics go, it seemed to get the reaction it was intended for. As, previously stated the atomic bomb was seen as more of a political statement by the U.S. than one produced of military necessity. “By the beginning of the 1990s, Samuel Walker’s review of the modern literature concluded that although many writers judged military factors to be critical, “nearly all students of the events leading to Hiroshima agree that, in addition to viewing it as the means to end the war quickly, the political implications of the bomb figured in the administration’s deliberations.” He also observed that “a broad consensus viewed diplomatic considerations as an important part of the administration’s view of the bomb’s value. (Alperovitz, Afterword).” In my opinion, this was absolutely an act of terrorism. The Wall Street Journal’s definition of terrorism is attacking civilians and thats what happened here. Hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children who were innocent, were slaughtered. Even President Truman could not believe the atrocities he signed off on. “At an afternoon Cabinet meeting on August 10 (according to the diary of Commerce Secretary Henry Wallace), “Truman said he had given orders to stop atomic bombing. He said the thought of wiping out another 100,000 people was too horrible. He didn’t like the idea of killing as he said, ‘all those kids.’ (Alperovitz, p.416-417).” This was a horrific event and many lives were taken and many more ruined. As philosopher Michael Walzer put it, “To use the atomic bomb, to kill and terrorize civilians, without even attempting [negotiations], was a double crime.” (Alperovitz, Conclusion).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 Dbq

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Admittedly, dropping the atomic bomb was a major factor in Japan's decision to accept the terms laid out at the Potsdam agreement otherwise known as unconditional surrender. Their casualties in defending the doomed island of Okinawa were a staggering 110,000 and the naval blockade that the allies had enforced whittled trade down to almost nothing (Document A). Americans had hit some 60 Japanese cities with out High Explosives and incendiary bombs (Document B). Japan was quickly on the path to destruction. Of course, the Allies ignored this for the reason that dropping the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would intimidate Russia. Had they truly been considering saving more lives and bringing a quick end to the war in Japan, they would have simply waited them out without the major loss of life seen at both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 6th of August 1945 was a day that people will always remember with terror. On this day, an atomic bomb was used by the U.S. against Japan, in the city of Hiroshima. This was the first time in world history. Before this sad event, Japan and the U.S. were having conflicts with each other because Japan tried to invade parts of Europe and the Pacific. In an attempt stop Japanese aggressions, the U.S. decided to stop the sale of war materials, such as iron and oil, to Japan. This angered the Japanese, and after peacetalks failed, the Japanese made a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. After this attack, the U.S. declared war on Japan. The two nations fought until after both Atom bombs were dropped (Ellis, 381-382). Through the orders of U.S. President Harry Truman, 13 sq. km were deserted, 70, 000 of 76, 000 buildings were destroyed, more than 70, 000 people were instantly killed, 122, 000 died later, due to the effects of the bombings, and 246, 000 more were severely injured (Söhr, 2). In this essay I want to explain why I would not have bombed Hiroshima like Harry Truman did, although there might have been several reasons to justify his decision.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One can argue that the dropping of the atomic bomb by the United States was strictly a military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. First, as stated in the Memoirs of Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, Japan was willing to literally “fight to the death” and the war was guaranteed to be prolonged for many months against the Japanese. Many more millions of American casualties were bound to happen and the U.S. wasn’t willing to risk all those lives. Because of this unwillingness to surrender, both Truman and Americans found it strenuous to figure out a way to end the war quicker. Charging into Japan or bombing Japanese cities with regular bombs would take up too much time and the number of casualties would only increase. Therefore, having the decision to use an atomic bomb to blow an entire city up within seconds, Truman undoubtedly ordered…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On August 6 and 9, 1945 United States dropped nuclear weapons on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, during the end of World War II. The two bombings, killed around 199,000 people, and until today has been the only use use of nuclear weapons in battle. Why did the United States drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and what was the aftermath? After the war in Europe had concluded when Nazi Germany surrendered on May 8, 1945, and Hitler committed suicide. The Japanese, refused to accept the Allies demands for unconditional surrender, so the Pacific War continued. Seeing as call for the unconditional surrender of the Japanese armed forces in the Potsdam Declaration on July 26, 1945, did not work, the alternative action was…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not the only option that the United States could have pursued in the war. There were other tactical options such as, negotiating, using a naval blockade, or continuing to fighting. Negotiations could have happened in the ceasefire that took place in 1945, but Harry Truman never pursued it. Douglas MacArthur who was the chief of staff of the United States Army, advised against the use of the bomb because he felt it would harm the Unites States’ reputation, and he felt that it was not necessary to end the war (“Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). The Japanese sent peace offers in January of 1945 stating, “1. Full surrender of the Japanese forces, air, land, and sea at home and…

    • 1704 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Japan had an estimated army of 5,000,000 men, they were on the verge of imminent collapse and the two atomic bombs that were dropped on them were not necessary to obtain Japan’s surrender. America’s primary reason for using the atomic bombs on Japan was to intimidate the Soviet Union so that the Soviet Union would stay out of the war with Japan and to demonstrate our world dominance, rather than dropping the bombs solely to induce Japan’s unconditional surrender.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To the dismay of many people on August 6, 1945, the first atomic bomb was used in the history of mankind as a part of warfare. Many people died as a result of these bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and because of the bombings, Japan knew it had been defeated, so it soon afterwards surrendered to America. I believe that the bombings were necessary in order to make Japan surrender because Harry Truman, the President of the United States of America, knew that the Japanese military was not going to slow down on its war effort unless the Commander in Chief reacted in an extreme manner to cripple the Japanese war effort enough so that Japan had no…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is our recommendation that the atomic bomb is not dropped at this time. Dropping the atomic bomb would be costly, and many innocent lives of children and women could be lost. We do not want lives of solders to be lost; therefore, we should force japan to surrender. We should also use the weapons that we are using at this time. If it is necessary to drop the atomic bomb, we should do so at the end as our final result.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bomb, we were able to put an end to a war that could have continued for many more years. Though there was much controversy over the bomb, Truman, our president at the time, apprised America saying he was quite thankful for it and celebrated the scientific achievements of the minds that created it. America was the first country to create something of this caliber and he wanted us to realize how great it was. The pragmatic decision helped America to establish its military power on a global scale. It is believed that Japan did not believe that we had a weapon that could cause so much destruction, so we had no choice but to show them. The Japanese people do not believe in surrendering, they see it as dishonorable and are…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman and the U.S. was not justified in using nuclear weapons to force Japan to capitulate. President Truman’s goal was to get Japan to surrender without thinking about the repercussions that Japan would face after the bombings. Many people died that day, and thousands were exposed to the harmful radiation from the bombs. People either died from the radiation or they are facing the aftermath of the heavy exposure of radiation. Numerous principles from the “Just War” doctrine were broken in order to get Japan to forfeit. People were considered objects that could be thrown aside. Though the U.S.’s motives were acceptable, its ways of executing it were unethical and…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People with an opposing point of view may argue that Harry Truman’s order for the first nuclear weapon to be released was completely inhumane, despite the predicaments they made Americans involuntarily participate. They even concluded that Japan was surrendering, and that they were “on their knees” before the U.S. decided to change history forever by using “terrorizing actions” (Manhattan Engineer District, 20). Even some military, intelligence analysts suggest that when the weapons were dislodged on August 6, 1945, the Americans only wanted to cause as much damage as possible. Although they considered the nuclear bombs a destructive force, they envied the Boeing B-29 Superfortress Bomber from which they descended. The Enola Gay, was an expensive war plane that released the weapons, vaporizing 70,000 Japanese citizens of Hiroshima (Manhattan Engineer District, 13). Upon the delivery of the atom bombs, thousands of citizens were killed instantly but the results were ineffective. After the original dismissal of explosives, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan, only two days later. Things were not looking good for any of the powers involved in this heinous war. Then on August 9th, a second atomic bomb was released on Nagasaki, and that resulted in the death of approximately 80,000 Japanese people, adding to their death total. Even…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    surrender and had a strong army of two million in home islands. The last rational option…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays