Preview

The Death Penalty Should Be Illegal

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Should Be Illegal
Capital punishment is the punishment of a heinous crime like murder. It is being used now in some states and has also been used in the ancient times. Thirteen states right now don’t have the death penalty: Alaska, District of Colombia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. But all states should ban it because the American Civil Liberties Union believes the death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ban against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantees of due process of law and of equal protection under the law. Capital punishment is an intolerable denial of civil liberties and is inconsistent with the fundamental values of our democratic system…. Why kill if you’re trying to tell them that killing is wrong? Killing someone is wrong in all ways!!! The death penalty in the United States is unfair manner against humans because it depends on how much money the person has, the lawyer’s skills and race of the victim and criminal. An African American would most likely be executed than a white person, especially if the victim is white. Also, how much money the county has that the crime was committed in, because if they don’t have enough money they may not put the criminal on death row.
Innocent people are too often sentenced to death. Since 1973, over 130 people have been released from death rows in states that support the death penalty because of innocence. Nationally, at least one person is exonerated for every 10 that are executed. In 1983, Carlos DeLuna was convicted for a stabbing in a Texas Convenience store, supposedly killed the store clerk Wanda Lopez. After his execution in 1989, new evidence uncovered by reporters Maurice Possley and Steve Mills cast doubt on DeLuna’s guilt and points to another man with similar crimes, Carlos Hernadez, who kept saying he killed the store clerk. ("Did Texas Execute Innocent Men?") In 1981 Leo Jones was convicted for



Cited: The Case Against the Death Penalty. https://www.aclu.org/capital-punishment/case-against-death-penalty. Capital Punishment. http://www.publishyourarticles.org/knowledge-hub/essay/should-capital-punishment-be-abolished-essay.html Executed But Possibly Innocent. www.deathpenaltyinfo.org

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    On December 7th of 1989, a man named Carlos DeLuna, was wrongfully executed for a…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 23rd of 1991, a horrible tragedy occurred. A small house in Corsicana, Texas caught fire and three young children perished inside while the father, Todd Willingham who was asleep when the fire began, made it out alive. Willingham was convicted for murder by arson and later executed in February of 2004. Those are the facts but the question remains, did Texas execute an innocent man? I believe so. In this essay I will state my reasons for believing Todd Willingham was innocent at the time of his execution and give the reasons the opposition found him to be guilty.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various problems inherent in the current death penalty system. The system is broken. The death penalty should find more effective ways to determine guilt. If not, the killing of innocent people will continue. The first aspect that should be changed is the selection and biasness of the jury, especially racial bias in jury selection. The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids the government from imposing "cruel and unusual punishments”. The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment, especial to ones that are innocent. They ultimately die in…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Parks, Peggy J. Current Issues: The Death Penalty, Current Issues: The Death Penalty, 2012, SIRS Issues Researcher,http://sks.sirs.com.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate for the death penalty is that the adversaries of capital punishment say it has no preventive influence on crime. They argue that it unmanly gives the government the power to take someone’s life, and prolong social fairness by unreasonably pursuing people of color. They argue that the reason they pursue people of color is because they do not have the funds to hire a good…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Texas and the Death Penalty

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages

    McKinley, J. (2009, December 12). Low i.q. murderer is executed in Texas. New York Times, 20.…

    • 5887 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the Death Penalty be allowed in the United States? What are some pros and cons of the death penalty? Some believe that the death penalty is a clever idea, however; I feel the death penalty is a very harsh punishment. The paragraphs below will explain in detail why I am against the death penalty. The cost of having criminals on death row versus life in prison, the mentally ill criminals, and the unfairness to the criminals.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas often uses “eyewitness identification with little or questionable forensic evidence,” basically putting more emphasis on what people say they saw, rather than concrete evidence to prove if the suspect did or did not commit a crime (2015, p. 446). Evidence that is found is often wrongly handled, or ignored until much later (typically after the suspect has been in prison or executed).…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Has it ever occurred to you that in this country you can be executed for a crime you didn’t commit, even if the method of killing you is expensive and completely unconstitutional? The government believes that this is the correct way to punish those who have committed horrific crimes. Is this really the best option? I don’t think so. As a citizen of this country, this system of “justice” appals me. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it is unconstitutional, comes at a great cost, and is otherwise ineffective at carrying out its intended purpose.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research has shown that racial discrimination has influence on capital punishment, according to the General Accounting Office, over 80% of studies have shown the race of the victim is closely correlated with receiving the death penalty. Other studies have shown that the defendant is four or five times as likely to get the death penalty if the victim was Caucasian than if the victim was African American. It’s not just that some defendants don't get the right to a fair trial just because of a person’s skin tone. Death row is the ultimate punishment, and should be issued out with the utmost extreme caution and fairness. The “death penalty” is just another way of saying an ‘eye for an eye’. Victims Deserve retribution, but over time society’s version of retribution has changed dramatically. People today believe that the taking of one's life in exchange for another’s is the only way to achieve true justice for the victim, but all they’ve achieved in the end is the loss of two lives. There are other ways, that do not involve ending a life, that are used to acquire justice all the same. Life without parole is much cheaper and more efficient way to attain Justice for the victims and their loved…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society it is quite possible for people to be accused and punished for committing a crime they didn’t actually do. It would be nice to think our judicial system is 100% accurate but unfortunately that is not the case. Innocent people are convicted of crimes they didn’t commit more often than a lot of people would like to admit. In some cases people who were later on found to be innocent have actually been put to death. A couple examples of this would be Ruben Cantu and Carlos DeLuna. Ruben Cantu was convicted of a capital murder and investigators found out about 12 years after his death that he didn’t commit the murder and was falsely accused. Later on detectives found out that he wasn’t even there the night of the murder. Carlos was another person who was accused of a crime he didn’t commit. Police didn’t find out till 20 years later that Carlos DeLuna was innocent and had nothing to do with a teen stabbing in Texas. It was Carlos Hernandez, a man who even confessed to committing the crime many times that was in fact guilty. Those are just two examples of our judicial system not being accurate at all. Just because somethings may point to a person doing a crime doesn’t mean that the person actually did and there needs to be more research and evidence to back all this up especially if people are being sentenced to life sentences in prison.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is something that has many countries in the world divided. In my opinion, I believe that the death penalty should be legal throughout the country. There are many reasons as to why the death penalty should be legalized in the country including retribution, deterrence, and morality. Also, because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will discredit the ideas that the death penalty is not constitutional, irreversible mistakes are made, and that race and income will face disproportionality.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you know that there were at least 5851 executions of death penalty carried out in the year of 2007? Malaysia is one of the 58 countries in the world that still have the death penalty. The death penalty in Malaysia is prescribed for several offences such as murder and waging war against the King as stated under the Penal Code, kidnapping for ransom which is an offence under The Kidnapping Act 1960 as opposed to simple kidnapping under the Penal Code, drug trafficking under the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and certain scheduled offences for activities in relation to possession of firearms and ammunition or explosives offences under the Firearms (Increased Penalties) Act 1971(FIPA). According to the Deputy Home Minister, Zainal Abidin Zin, between 1970 and October 2001, 359 death sentences were carried out. The majority were for trafficking in dangerous drugs. Recently, question arise whether we should abolish capital punishment or not. It is the right time for us to rethink the relevancy of death penalty in Malaysia.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays