Preview

The Chernobyl Disaster

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Chernobyl Disaster
On the 26th of April in 1986 one of the worst nuclear disasters in history occurred at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the Ukraine. The number 4 reactor at the Chernobyl Nuclear power plant ended up exploding after several errors that occurred during a scheduled safety systems test. The explosions released large amounts of radioactive materials into the sky and it was spread over great distances by wind streams. The repercussions of the disaster are only now being better understood today. The reactor type at Chernobyl was a RBMK type reactor. The reactor is a vertically oriented reactor that uses graphite as an insulator which also caused problems due to the combustibility of the graphite that was used. "The reactor fuel is zirconium alloy clad uranium oxide enriched to 2.0% U-235" (Mosey). The RBMK reactor also has two 500MWt reactors which operate safely at 100% power of 1000MWt. "Reactor control is achieved by means of 211 boron carbide absorber rods" (Mosey). The purpose of the rods is to absorb the excess electrons in the core and to control the rate in which the reaction is taking place. At Chernobyl nuclear fusion occurred by bombarding an isotope of Uranium 235 with an electron thus causing it to become unstable and split into other radioactive elements and at the same time releases a great amount of energy that we harness, and several electrons which continue the reaction.
"The test involved using the residual energy of the turbogenerator as it ran down to provide electricity for the main circulating pumps to reduce the time the pumps would be without power following a postulated loss of electrical power" (Mosey). Initially they decreased the power of the reactor to 50% power and isolated the ECI (emergency coolant injection system for a period of 22 hours and during this portion of the test everything checked out alright. After they had completed that portion of the test they decreased the power even farther to about 20-30% of full power. "The



Cited: Baverstock, Keith, and Dillwyn Williams. "The Chernobyl Accident 20 Years On: An Assessment of the Health Consequences and the International Response." Environmental Health Perspectives 114.9 (2006): 1312-317 Mosey, David. Chernobyl, 26 April 1986. 6 April 2006. Nuclear Engineering International. 23 March 2007 http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?storyCode=2035370 The Chernobyl Disaster. 27 April 2006. BBC News. 23 March 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/guides/456900/456957/html/nn1page1.stm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    * The disaster occurred due to an experiment which was being run by the reactor engineers.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the nuclear timeline there has been dozens of accidents that have cost several innocent lives. With examples such as the Chernobyl incident in 1986 that affected nearly five hundred…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first disparity between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accident is the causes. The Chernobyl accident was caused by human error in conducting the plant outside its technical specifications and failure to notify the proper authorities following the accident. Chernobyl’s power plant also had a faulty nuclear reactor design which exclude a containment structure typically found in most nuclear power plant. The two contributing factors usher the nuclear reactor to explode and failure to contain discharge of radioactive materials into the atmosphere. In contrast, the Fukushima accident precipitate due to natural disaster consist of earthquake and tsunami causing a malfunction of the plant’s cooling system. Unlike Chernobyl, Fukushima’s nuclear plant…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plant suffered major damage from the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that hit Japan on March 11, 2011 and, as of December 2012, is not expected to reopen. The earthquake and tsunami disabled the reactor cooling systems, leading to releases of radioactivity and triggering a 30 km evacuation zone surrounding the plant. On April 20, 2011, the Japanese authorities declared the 20 km evacuation zone a no-go area which may only be entered under government supervision.…

    • 5782 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chernobyl

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The test was run in the middle of the night so that the city of Kiev wouldn’t run on low power during the day. At Midnight, the reactor gradually began to slow because it was starting the shutdown process, but Anatoly Dyatlov wanted the process to go faster, so he ordered for the control rods to be lifted. What he didn’t realize, was that the water around the reactor began to drain, and without the water cooling the reactor, it began to overhear. The high temperature caused tremors, power surges and the rods jammed, creating an explosion. Firefighters were brought on site to stop the fires surrounding the plant, however no one was aware of the radioactive dangers at that point, so all of them were exposed and many died at the scene or later on from cancer.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fire in the reactor caused a release of radioactivity, which led to a ban on milk sales from nearby farms. The site was later renamed Sellafield. Modern reactors are designed to shut down automatically. The worst nuclear power accident in history took place in Chernobyl in 1986 when a reactor there exploded, killing tens of people instantly and exposing hundreds of thousands more to radiation.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Engineers build significant structures that can last more than a century, some of these structures such as Burj Khalifa, pyramids and evil towers in France can be considered as landmarks, because of its history and its beauty of design. Civil Engineers study the four factors of building structures to determine which tools and materials they will use in order to build permanent structures. Although engineers studying the factors and take the determination, there is some disasters occurred in many places because of many reasons. Nick Spurrier said “There will always be failures or disasters as engineers and designers push the boundaries by building taller buildings, longer bridges, or by reaching further into space”. In this outline I will show some of engineering disasters that happened before and what are the reasons.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fukushima Disaster

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    An earthquake of magnitude 9.0 on a Richter Scale initially damaged the reactors. According to the World Nuclear Association, reactor 4 had been de-fueled while reactors 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance. Immediately after the earthquake, the remaining reactors 1-3 shut down automatically and emergency generators came online to power electronics and coolant systems. However, a tsunami rapidly followed the earthquake, flooding the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to critical pumps, which must continuously circulate coolant water through a nuclear reactor for several days after being shut down in order to keep the plant from melting…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay on Chernobyl

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On 25 April, prior to a routine shut-down, the reactor crew at Chernobyl-4 began preparing for a test to determine how long turbines would spin and supply power following a loss of main electrical power supply. Similar tests had already been carried out at Chernobyl and other plants, despite the fact that these reactors were known to be very unstable at low power settings.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is significant to know what happened at Three Mile Island and at Chernobyl even though there regardless of the little interest in science or engineering due to many factors. The Chernobyl accident in Belarus and Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania made us aware that the error in technological systems can result in life destructive situations. Even though there are several benefits and gains from advanced technology, engineering and science, it can result in life threatening situations as well in case of fault conditions. These incidents help to understand the…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chernobyl Research Paper

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages

    World Nuclear Association. (2012, April 1). Chernobyl Accident 1986. (pp.1) Retrieved October 19, 2012, from World Nuclear Association: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Chernobyl' Nuclear Power Plant was one of the largest in the USSR. It was located just outside of the town of Pripyat', about 18 km northwest of the town of Chernobyl'. The plant was only 16 km from the border between the Ukrainian and Belorussian republics and roughly 110 km north of Kiev, the capital and largest city of Ukraine. Construction of the plant began in the 1970s, with reactor No. 1 commissioned in 1977, followed by No. 2 (1978), No. 3 (1981), and No. 4 (1983). Each reactor had an electricity-generating capacity of 1,000 megawatts, and the four together produced about 10 percent of Ukraine's electricity at the time of the accident. Two more reactors (No. 5 and No. 6, also capable of producing 1,000 megawatts each) were under construction at the time of the accident. On the morning of April 26, 1986, reactor No. 4 was operating at very low capacity (6 to 7 percent) during a planned shutdown. Plant personnel intended to monitor the performance of turbine generators, which supplied electric power for the plant's own operation, during a changeover from standard to a backup source of power. The reactor's design made it unstable at low power, and the operators were careless about safety precautions during the test. After a sudden power surge, two explosions destroyed the reactor core and…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Voices from Chernobyl is an important resource for anyone dreaming of becoming any kind of scientist one day. If one is going to conduct experiments, it is crucial that person knows the fire they’re playing with. In other words, one must be fully aware of the consequences of their experiment, especially if it goes wrong. All a disaster takes is for one incorrect step, calculation, or error of any kind for an experiment to go wrong, and in Chernobyl’s case, simple design flaws and slight coincidences led to an explosion that took thousands of lives and still continues to have an impact on the environment today. So, in this case, it is perfectly logical that students read this book in chemistry classes as a sort of cautionary tale. Students set on becoming scientists when they grow up need to know the possible repercussions of their experiments and the impact they can have on both the environment and innocent civilians in case their procedures go wrong.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chernobyl Research Paper

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1986 at 01:23 a.m., an explosion at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant occurred contaminating the surrounding areas with radiation. The result was the world's worst accident in the history of nuclear power. The effects that this disaster caused were endless. "Nine million people were affected from Chernobyl" (Chernobyl Heart). There were immediate as long as long-term health effects caused by this explosion. There were also many social effects after this disaster. Many of these consequences are still being experienced today, twenty years later. The explosion that occurred at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant has produced tremendously severe, negative effects.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

    • 42906 Words
    • 172 Pages

    A First-Hand Account of Japan's Nuclear Crisis Katsumi Furitsu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 Young doctors speak out on the Fukushima disaster . . . . . . . . . . .40 Japan’s Nuclear Nightmare Ronald McCoy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 “A terribly difficult situation with a lot of uncertainties”: PSR Press Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 What may we learn from Fukushima? Frank Boulton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57 Radiation in medicine and in nuclear power plants: the same but very different Andreas Nidecker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61 Children, Teens and the Japan Disaster Harry Wang . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63…

    • 42906 Words
    • 172 Pages
    Powerful Essays