The Best Explanation
Inference to the Best Explanation is a type of abductive reasoning. In making this inference one infers, from the fact that a certain hypothesis would explain the evidence, to the truth of that hypothesis. In general, there will be multiple different hypotheses that might explain the evidence, so one must be able to decide which one is the correct hypothesis. One of the classic examples is how to explain wet grass. If the grass is wet, it probably rained. The Inference of the Best Explanation, one does not doubt anything- but is searching for an answer for a certain point. To do this, they usually use reasoning of prior knowledge. The Inference of the Best Explanation is part of Empiricism, the theory that all knowledge is derived from sense-experience,
…show more content…
This concept suggests that all knowledge takes on the form of our mental representations and our mind examines it in a variety of ways. Everyone sees and interprets situations differently, in their own minds. We all have different models in our minds that reflect our morals of what we think are right or wrong, or affect the way we observe certain aspects of situations. This affects the way we reason and evaluate. It correlates with Inference to the Best Explanation because they both derive from our own experiences and observations. All experiences affect people differently and everyone learns in different ways. The egocentric problem affects Inference to the Best Explanation in that way because we all vary in our thoughts and interpretations in our mind. When it comes to John Locke’s theory of limited representationalism, I personally feel that is that there can be grey areas in the separation of the primary and secondary qualities. They all generate from the same category of our senses, yet they are different. There are a lot of different ways to view the separation, which means that other philosophers could have separated them differently. Locke’s theory of limited representationalism allows us to analyze the way we observe things and it really puts our thought processes in
This concept suggests that all knowledge takes on the form of our mental representations and our mind examines it in a variety of ways. Everyone sees and interprets situations differently, in their own minds. We all have different models in our minds that reflect our morals of what we think are right or wrong, or affect the way we observe certain aspects of situations. This affects the way we reason and evaluate. It correlates with Inference to the Best Explanation because they both derive from our own experiences and observations. All experiences affect people differently and everyone learns in different ways. The egocentric problem affects Inference to the Best Explanation in that way because we all vary in our thoughts and interpretations in our mind. When it comes to John Locke’s theory of limited representationalism, I personally feel that is that there can be grey areas in the separation of the primary and secondary qualities. They all generate from the same category of our senses, yet they are different. There are a lot of different ways to view the separation, which means that other philosophers could have separated them differently. Locke’s theory of limited representationalism allows us to analyze the way we observe things and it really puts our thought processes in