Preview

The Argument Against Racial Profiling

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
374 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Argument Against Racial Profiling
Racial Profiling is the act of targeting a person specially based on their race. Racial profiling does not refer to the act of a law enforcement agent pursuing a suspect in which the specific description of the suspect includes race or ethnicity in combination with other identifying factors. One of the largest groups that are racially profiled are of the Arab heritage that live in the United States. This is because of the 2001 Terrorist Attack on the Twin towers in New York City on September 11.

The second largest group that is racially profiled are African American. Examples of this targeting are who authorities decide to pull over in traffic stops, this is referred to often as “driving while black or brown”. The theory of this states that if of African American decent you are more likely to be pulled over. Although "Driving While Black/Brown" traffic stops and searches are the form of racial profiling that has received the most media attention, profiling takes place off the roadways as well. Black and Latino pedestrians are regularly stopped and frisked without reasonable cause. …show more content…
Even though the constitution has these safeguards in place Racial Profiling continues on because of loopholes and other ways that traffic officers are able to go around the topic. Only 29 of our 50 states have laws in legislation that abide by racial profiling. The Iron Triangle is a concept that declares that committees in the House and Senate, federal departments and agencies, and think tanks and interest groups all work together to develop and conserve their own power, and expand their political influence. This would mean that any race that is not at the forefront of this agency is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Trayvon Martin: The Reality Of Racial Profiling
    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Trayvon Martin: The Reality Of Racial Profiling

    In terms of motorists, in 2005 Black drivers were three times more likely to be stopped and searched by police than Whites, and were twice as likely than White drivers to be arrested during a traffic stop (“Reality of Racial Profiling”). These findings demonstrate that police are more likely to target people of color than Whites and case studies have shown that this practice is counterproductive and a misallocation of law enforcement resources. For example, in Arizona although Black motorists were more likely than Whites to be stopped and searched, Whites who were searched were more likely to be carrying contraband (“Reality of Racial Profiling”). The case study in Arizona exemplifies a problem in the criminal justice system that must be addressed. Minority motorists are more likely than White motorists to be stopped and harassed by police based off the inherent belief that people of a minority race, ethnicity, or religion are more likely to engage in criminal or unlawful activity than…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Argument Against Racial Profiling
    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument Against Racial Profiling

    Racial profiling means a standard of unequal protection. Blacks and even Latinos are most likely…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling: a Modern Day Epidemic
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Racial Profiling: a Modern Day Epidemic

    Did you know that an appalling, unconstitutional and pernicious attack happens continuously in today’s society against innocent citizens and nobody does anything about it? This practice is called racial profiling. Mr. Bob Herbert, a journalist for the New York Times, discusses this in his article, “Hounding the Innocent”. This article is an insightful and informative. He informs his readers about many actual situations of innocent citizens becoming victims of this cruel practice. Mr. Herbert is correct, racial profiling is unnecessary and hurtful or is sickening and should not even exist. Racial profiling is the practice of using one’s skin color as evidence for grounds of suspicion. How can one say that this practice is fair? Racial profiling should be eliminated; it is insensitive, unconstitutional and has a detrimental effect on society.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Is A Bad Ide Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Racial Profiling Is A Bad Ide Rhetorical Analysis

    In the United States of America racial discrimination still exists to this day. Minorities in our country are not seen as equal people. When a person is deprived of their human rights it makes them feel degraded and troubled. In order to become a more civilized country, we must forget the color of our own skin and live with each other as one. In the article “Why Racial Profiling is a Bad Idea” by Tom Head, discusses the way cops pay more attention to those of minority races and how they usually find them guilty of crimes they didn’t commit. Even though many officers will deny their participation in this type of profiling, a lot use this tactic to pull over and arrest Minority races. The article “Racial Profiling Lives On” by Devon Carbado, Cheryl Harris and Kimberle Crenshaw, also displays examples of how racial profiling continues to this day. There are many ways cops can search/arrest African Americans or other Minorities for no reason and still keep from breaking the Fourth Amendment and the authors of “Racial Profiling Lives On” supports there claims with emotional examples that appeal to a pathological type of audience.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is Racial Profiling Justified to Ensure a Nation's Safety?
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is Racial Profiling Justified to Ensure a Nation's Safety?

    Racial profiling is a phenomenon which causes people of certain races to be presumed as a criminal - in the light of the law, or simply a worthless person - in the eyes of the society. In her essay "Is Ethnic Profiling Justified Under Threat of Terrorism?", dr. Huma Abbasi makes it clear by giving an example of the mistreatment of the blacks, which has been present in the US since the country was born. From the very beginning of the United States' existence, black people had a hard time living in the New World. As slaves, they were treated as a property, not people, and they were not given any rights. The color of their skin alone and nothing more signified their poor status and low value. Although many years have passed since their long struggle - first against slavery, then against discrimination and segregation - and the blacks finally achieved equality, the prejudice against African Americans is still strongly rooted in American mentality. According to Abbasi, when it comes to criminality, African Americans are most likely to be the suspects just because they have appeared in the wrong place at the wrong time. Abbasi states that "every year, hundreds of innocent African-American motorists are stopped and searched on highways by law enforcement on suspicion of drug or gun possession, an assumption of guilt based…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling
    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling

    Racial profiling, defined as the targeting of individuals and groups by law enforcement officials, even partially, on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion, except when there is trustworthy information, relevant to the locality and timeframe, that links persons belonging to one of the groups to an identified criminal incident or scheme. Law enforcement agencies are designed to protect the people. They are mandated to operate in a fair and ethical manner. Their primary function is to up hold the Constitution, law, and defend the rights of the people. These actions should be conducted in a manner that treats everyone equally, without regard to their race, gender, or ethnicity. The clear alternative is for law enforcement…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Holder's Argument Against Racial Profiling
    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Holder's Argument Against Racial Profiling

    These federal laws don’t apply everywhere, two examples of place that they wouldn’t be applied is border patrols at the country’s southwest boundaries as well as airline security. Twenty states don’t have laws against racial profiling because there is no uniform standard for police departments in communities. Profiling is beginning to cause arguments between law enforcement and pedestrians, one main topic is the new stop-and-frisk program. As the program continually increased the amount of fallouts the judge finally deemed the program to disturb the rights of the minority residents. France, is a highly populated area that also has many profiling concerns most concerning Arabs and blacks. These concerns were brought to court where they were then dismissed by a judge in…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling
    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Racial Profiling

    Racial Profiling is one of the many areas covered in racial discrimination. It refers to the discriminatory practice, especially by law enforcement officials which targets individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Racial profiling has been and is still an issue today in almost every part of the United States. It is seen in different situations whereby people are treated very unfairly or branded criminals and suspects without any form of evidence It is a type of racial discrimination seen in all places though racial discrimination touches many areas like award of government benefits which is unequally shared as it should ,but at times based on who the person is. For example, I was once a…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis Of Arguments Against Racial Profiling
    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Arguments Against Racial Profiling

    Although racial profiling is legal, it's is unacceptable and very common in society. Racial profiling is defined as, “discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin.” Even though it is said that in America racism is not acceptable, it is practiced on today’s society making it seem acceptable to everyone. As said in the article “Jim Crow Policing” by Bob Herbert, “It is incredible how few of the stops yielded any law enforcement benefit. Contraband, which usually means drugs, was found only in 1.6 percent of the stops of black New Yorkers. For…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Racial Profiling Cons
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Racial Profiling Cons

    Ever since September 11, 2001, the world’s fight against terrorism has been a continuous battle. The difference between this war, and all the other wars prior, is that we don't know who the enemy is at certain times. A system had to be put into play based upon statistics to narrow down a group of people who would be more likely to carry out an attack, or commit a crime. Since then, Racial Profiling, or police profiling has been used as a tool to reduce crime, and prevent attacks throughout the world. The war on terror was a key factor in creating racial profiling because it uses statistics to target suspected terrorists, allowed us to see what organizations were mainly responsible for attacks, and aided in the United States forming a system…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Psychological Arguments Against Racial Profiling
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Psychological Arguments Against Racial Profiling

    The majority of society believes that racial profiling does not exist, yet it does. Racial profiling creates the psychological assumption that all minorities will most likely engage in criminal activity, whether it is intentional or unintentional. This form of criminal action is illegal and is a transparent form of racism. Racial profiling is a severe problem in today’s society, whether it is in the U.S or in other countries. This sort of action is not based on one category. It can be based on race, gender, appearance, religion, etc. Racial profiling and the inability to protect to the minority society has prevented the minorities from trusting the law enforcement. According to Ramirez (2000), racial profiling is defined as any police action…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Racial Profiling Defensible Public Policy?
    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is Racial Profiling Defensible Public Policy?

    The judging of an individual’s character by their race did not become relevant because of the Rodney King beating, the attacks on the World Trade Center, or the illegal aliens crossing the Mexican border. Racial Discrimination has been a reoccurring issue for centuries. Throughout time, these judgments and discriminations have led to unwarranted searches, racial riots and unjust prosecutions. Racial Profiling not only adds to this overwhelming issue but is upheld by the U.S. government and prominent leaders. Racial profiling has caused divisions between black men and the police, negative effects on immigration and race relations, and false imprisonment, further proving that racial profiling is not defensible public policy.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against Racial Profiling
    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arguments Against Racial Profiling

    Racial profiling occurs when race is used by law enforcement or private security officials, to any degree, as a basis for criminal suspicion in non-suspect specific investigations according to Goldberg (1999). With that said, discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, nationality or on any other particular identity undermines the basic human rights and freedoms to which every person is entitled.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Racial Profiling Wrong
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is Racial Profiling Wrong

    Racial Profiling is being biased by the law enforcement, they target people based on their race, ethnicity or their religion. Somebody assuming you are doing something wrong based on your race or the color of your skin. Me personally I have never been racially profiled, but I was once with my friend that is black and she was accused by the owner of the store for stealing when she was not really stealing. I think that racial profiling is wrong, you should treat people the way that you want to be treated. Racial Profiling is destroying the mindset of people and how they think and act.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Racial Profiling
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Racial Profiling

    Racial profiling is the law-enforcement practice of singling out members of racial minorities as suspects. Heavily practiced in airports today, this procedure does much more harm than good. In suspecting Arabs or other minorities solely for the fact that they are of a different…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More