Preview

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Jv and Ws

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Jv and Ws
1. Introduction
The aim of this essay is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of setting up a wholly owned subsidiary (WOS) instead of a joint venture (JV). There are numerous studies and research papers done on which entry mode is best in different situations, but there is no simple task deciding which is the best unless one can see into the future. JV and WOS are two completely different entry modes with their distinct down- and upsides. Entering a new market gives both great opportunities and involves high risk. There is much at stake but if one choose wrong entry mode it can cost the company tremendously, that is why one should not take this decision based on a few factors.

The globalisation has given companies a bigger market opportunities, but competing in the global market one also gets involved in the environmental uncertainty, such as the economic recession. The competition is also getting harder, the mixture of big multinational enterprises, the niche specialized businesses and the new copycats pushes companies to be innovate and expand or just sell out. But what is most important to consider when one chooses an entry mode? Is it the cultural differences, cost, profit, risk, competitive advantage, the objectives, the internal and external environment, the foreign market, knowledge and experience? To find an entry mode with just advantages is impossible, the choice boils down to which factor the company values the most.

2. Theory

2.1 The advantages of WOS

A wholly owned subsidiary is either a completely new operation or an acquisition of another company where the parent company owns 100% of the stocks (Hill, Jones 2010). Being a sole owner the company can monitor and control all the decisions and actions of their subsidiaries in an efficient way (Otto, 2010). The amount of control is highest in WOS because there is no dilemma of having to merge different opinions, policies and cultures. The risk of losing valuable technological



References: Aswathappa K. (2010) International Business. Tata McGraw Hill Businesslink.gov.uk: Joint Ventures and partnering. [Online] Available at: http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1075411631&type=RESOURCES (Accessed 05.06.11) Hill C. & Jones, G. (2010) Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. South Western Cengage learning Otto, M. (2010) The relative performance of joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries and the reasons why they exit. Diplomica Verlag Makino, S. & Yiu, D. (2002) The choice between joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science. Vol 13. No. 6. P. 668-675 Morschett D., Shcramm-Klein H. & Zentes J. (2010) Strategic International Management: Text and Cases. Gabler Verlag

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Buss499Assignment5

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Hill, C. W. L & Jones, G. R. (2012). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.…

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following paragraphs will discuss week four 's readings that covered vertical mergers, horizontal mergers, conglomerates, and joint ventures. Companies use mergers and joint ventures to increase profitability and efficiency. The following paper will go over the three alliances as well as a joint venture and how it differs from the mergers. Each business arrangement is used to attempt an improvement for the company, the important thing to remember is which will be most beneficial and why.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based on a qualitative cost & benefit analysis (exhibit 2), a wholly owned subsidiary provides the most advantage to Sterling. Although this requires the most capital and management commitment, the benefits it offers offsets such costs including full profitability as opposed to a shared profit in case of a joint venture (exhibit 3). Also, in terms of the goals, strategy, resources and organizational structure of Sterling, a subsidiary best enables the firm to reach its objectives (exhibit 4).…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rei Sporting Goods

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Hill, C, Jones, G. (2010) Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach.9th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    structure and firm performance: A comparison of the resource-based view and the contingency approach", Management Decision, Vol. 48 Iss: 8 pp. 1282 – 1303…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2010). Strategic Management, An Integrated Approach. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    An essential part of corporate strategy is choosing the right portfolio of business to compete in especially when it concerns growth strategy and over the years this has become one of the key challenges faced by managers. It is highly imperative for business leaders to understand the different strategic options suitable for operating in various types of industries or markets. Suffice is to say that the business environment, which includes the competitive activity also plays a deep-seated role in deciding which strategic choice is most appropriate for the company or firm.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Lewis

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Charles Hill and Gareth R. Jones, 2009. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. 9th edition. Nelson Education, LTD. Printed in the United States of America.…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grvard Business

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Have the two subsidiaries ever collaborated together before? Is there any incentive to collaborate / harmonize the two operations now? (15%)…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hill, C. W., & Jones, G. R. (2007). Strategic management theory: an integrated approach (7th ed.). boston, mass: houghton Mifflin.…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Health Care Analysis

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Yarbrough, A. K., & Powers, T. L. (2006). A Resource-Based View of Partnership Strategies in…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Administrator

    • 10215 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Hill, Charles W. L., and Gareth R. Jones. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. 6th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin: 2004…

    • 10215 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Danone and Wahaha

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The main issue concerned in the French Danane Groupe and China’s Wahaha Group joint venture agreement in the 2007-2009 period, centres on the different attitude towards Wahaha’s non joint-venture subsidiaries. This dispute highlights the lack of cooperative strategic management and effective communication, the lack of sound institutionally provided legal structure to support joint venture contracts and perhaps ultimately the lack of cultural fusion.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In multibusiness companies, the existence of a corporate parent, by w h i c h we mean all those levels of management that are not part of customer-facing, profit-responsible business units, entails costs. These costs, w h i c h include not only corporate overheads but also knock-on costs of corporate reporting in the businesses, are not balanced by any direct revenues, since the corporate parent has no external customers for its services. Furthermore, the business units often feel that they could be i n d e p e n d e n t l y viable and, indeed, could do better without a corporate parent. This belief is given credence by the success of so m a n y management buy-outs and spin-off companies. The parent can therefore only justify itself if its influence leads to better performance by the businesses than they would otherwise achieve as independent, stand-alone entities. It must either carry out functions that the businesses would be unable to perform as cost-effectively for themselves or it must influence the businesses to make better decisions than they w…

    • 4971 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Charles Hill, G. J., 15 Oct 2009. Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. 9th ed. Ohio : Cenage learning .…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays