Preview

The Act of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
552 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Act of God
Act of God is a legal term[1] for events outside of human control, such as sudden floods or other natural disasters, for which no one can be held responsible. This does not protect those who put others in danger of acts of nature through negligence, such as an adult who instructs a group of children to stand under a tree to escape a lightning storm.[citation needed]

The legal term, "Act of God", does not necessarily imply that a God had a direct intervention which specifically caused a "natural" occurrence or disaster.

Contract law

In the law of contracts, an act of God may be interpreted as an implied defense under the rule of impossibility, i.e., the promise is discharged because of unforeseen, naturally occurring events that were unavoidable and which would result in insurmountable delay, expense or other material breach. In other contracts, such as indemnification, an act of God may be no excuse, and in fact may be the central risk assumed by the promisor, e.g., flood insurance or crop insurance; the only variables being the timing and extent of the damage. In many cases, failure by way of ignoring obvious risks due to "natural phenomena" will not be sufficient to excuse performance of the obligation, even if the events are relatively rare, e.g., the year 2000 problem in computers. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, 2-615, failure to deliver goods sold may be excused by an "act of God" if the absence of such act was a "basic assumption" of the contract, but has made the delivery commercially "impacticable".

In the law of torts, an act of God may be asserted as a type of intervening cause, the lack of which would have avoided the cause or diminished the result of liability (e.g., but for the earthquake, the old, poorly constructed building would be standing). However, foreseeable results of unforeseeable causes may still raise liability. For example, a bolt of lightning strikes a ship carrying volatile compressed gas, resulting in the expected

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Long Island Railroad). Negligence is the legal term given to actions that breach the duty of care that one owes another according to the law. The court considered that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to Helen Palsgraf, and therefore no negligence was committed. The court found that the risk of the harm was unforeseeable. According to The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, “If the risk of harm is foreseeable, then the duty exists” (2014, pg.224). The court found that the actions which occurred were not only unforeseeable in to the objective observer, but also to Helen Palsgraf. This is to say that the risk was unforeseeable to an objective or reasonably subjective person in her position. The court found that the proximity of the plaintiff to the cause of action was irrelevant. Long Island Railroad actions or inactions caused no negligence to Helen Palsgraf. Even if there was negligence toward someone else, this is not a basis for a claim by Helen…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Negligence per se: No rational relationship between you hitting someone (car) and you not having insurance.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cause of death if the death would have occurred anyway. WHITE (1910). Legal causation will…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Brief

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiffs argues recovery under the “reasonably Foreseeability” test, which would allow a Plaintiff outside the “Zone of Danger” to recover, which was adopted in Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 (1979). The Court stated in response that the Plaintiff’s flexible interpretation of the “jurisprudential concept …which require[s] that the defendant’s breach of a duty of care proximately causes plaintiff’s injury,” was flawed. Moreover, that “at some point along the causal chain, the passage of time and the span of distance mandate a cut-off point for liability.” Id.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, an astrophysicist, “Once upon a time, people identified the god Neptune as the source of storms at sea. Today we call these storms hurricanes… The only people who still call hurricanes acts of God are the people who write insurance forms.” This quote by Neil DeGrasse Tyson not only applies to storms, but also applies to many things we previously did not understand. It basically displays the idea that just because we do not understand a concept, does not mean we will not be able to explain it in the future. Our society must get to the point of being comfortable with not knowing, instead of using myth to explain concepts we do not understand. In…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The doctrine of negligence per se applies if an event causing harm does not normally occur in the absence of negligence.…

    • 4685 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law looks at two types of causation—actual cause and proximate cause. Often, injury and harm is the result of a chain of events. The person who is the actual cause may or may not be legally responsible. Proximate cause is that act in the natural, direct, uninterrupted sequence of events without which the injury would not have occurred. Proximate cause seeks to decide who, in that chain of events, is responsible for the harm. This can get complicated.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Causation: Having been part of negligent activity, however not legally responsible under the law…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Second Generation of Books

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Hartman, Chester and Gregory D. Squires. 2006. There Is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster:…

    • 2562 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is apparent in our class readings, that when the gods are angry at the humans they created, these gods unleash unforgiving rains to flood the earth, and kill the human race. Over the years, there have been various texts about these floods. While the occurrences of the floods themselves are continuous throughout these texts, they have varying reasons for the cause of the floods and different aftermaths or consequences. Three of these texts in particular which tell the story of these floods, are Gilgamesh translated by Stephen Mitchell, Metamorphoses by Ovid and Genesis. The main factor in these floods was of course the god or gods who created it. Therefore, the floods in each of these three texts were different, because the gods who created the floods were different. Even though a flood occurs in all of the three texts, the cause, the flood itself and the aftermaths of the floods are different.…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Private Nuisance Term

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In respect of the claim by the neighbouring factory for loss of turnover, DFK could find that they are legally liable in tort of Nuisance. Nuisance claims can take two forms:…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miracles - Philosophy

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another philosopher would had a problem with miracles was a man called Wiles. He basically said, to say god carries out these miraculous events is to say god is guilty of obituary and partisan. Any event where the natural flow is violated for a certain people raises the issue of fairness and consistency. Wiles also said the two idea of having an all loving god and the existence of miracles are two incompatible ideas so its easier to believe that god is all loving and reject the idea of miracles. If this was in reverse and miracles existed and god could intervene then why didn't he intervene is horrific events such as Auschwitz or Hiroshima instead he saves one persons life, this seems unfair and a contradiction of an all loving god. As for biblical miracles Wiles said we must take them in a symbolic sense rather than a literal sense. A strength of Wiles it that allows educated believers to keep faith with god and uphold their faith in natural laws.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two "types" of evil considered to be in the world, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is that evil that comes from an action (or inaction) taken by a human. An example of a moral sin could be shooting a gun that causes death. However, equally a moral evil is preventing access to the weapon and not doing so. As John Gerstner states "Natural Evil, although distinct from moral evil, is not separate from it" (Gerstner, 412). Natural evil, on the other hand, is not caused, it "just happens". Tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, diseases, and so on all fall under this category of evil.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Disasters Paper

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Natural disasters occur on Earth every day. They range from earthquake that can’t be felt to Tsunamis that kill and destroy millions of dollars of property. No matter big or small they happen and the best geologist can predict them to a certain degree yet no natural occurring disaster can be entirely predicted or stopped. People seem to look to blame something or someone for these things but we are only able to do so much to lessen the consequences of these disasters.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance Cars v Abraham [1962] 1 QB 33: P had a car collision with X that meant P’s car needed a respray. He then collided with D, through D’s negligence, which would of itself have necessitated a respray. P sued D for the cost of a respray. CA ruled that since P’s car already needed a respray, the need for it did not flow from D’s negligence and therefore he would not be liable. Lord Evershed MR says to allow P to claim for damage that merely “would have” been caused by D in other circumstances is absurd: suppose A chips my windscreen so I have to get a new one and then you chip it: surely you shouldn’t compensate me because there is no extra damage caused by your action.…

    • 6357 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Good Essays