Preview

Thapar Vs Zezulka Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
91 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Thapar Vs Zezulka Summary
The authors describe the case of Thapar v. Zezulka is what the state of Texas established their precedent for mental health professional not obligated to warn and protect third parties when a client reveals an intent to harm. The arthurs discuss the ACA code of ethics as being more permissive than Texas statues in reporting results of HIV testing Barbee et al. (2007). Mental health professional has a duty to protect the client and breaching of confidentiality is an issue when dealing with a client threating harm to a third

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    TKAM summaries 18-31

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Chapter 18: Mayella begins her testimony, she is nineteen and relatively clean compared to the rest of the Ewells. She lives with seven younger siblings who do not help with any chores and an alchoholic father. She also does not seem to know what friends even are. She says that she had offered Tom Robinson a nickel the evening of the incident to break up a chifferobe for her. Atticus questions her story. Like why she didnt put up a better fight or why the children didnt hear her screams, and most of all how Tom managed to do this with only his right arm. Atticus pleas her to admit that there was no rape and it was her father who beat her but this only leads to anger and yelling. She then starts to cry and refuses to answer more questions.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella, n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar, a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore, a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at the facility and the determination, customary at that time, was made to have Poddar involuntarily committed. Dr. Moore notified the campus police and requested that Poddar be picked up, warning that Poddar can appear quite rational at times. Campus…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1976, the California Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapists have a duty to warn and protect potential victims if their patients made threats or otherwise behaved as if they presented a serious danger of violence to another. This ruling happened because of the Tarasoff Case of 1969, in which the court determined the need for therapists to protect the public was more important than protecting patient-therapist confidentiality. (Vitelli 1)…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jaffee V. Redmond (1996)

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Levy (1996) looks at the decision as representing a victory for advocates for patient privacy and confidentiality rights. the American Psychiatric Association joined in the suit and argued in an amicus brief that in addition to Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, common law tradition support recognition of the patient-therapist privilege and it didn’t matter whether or not the therapist is a medical doctor. The issue was not the credentials of the therapist, but rather relationship nature between the caregiver and the patient. Mary Lu Redmond , On June 27, 1991, a police officer was called to a fight at an…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This quote reminds me so much of Jody. “Growing up, sports is my outlet, my way to portray a personality. I was very shy around people, but through sports, something I was good at, I was able to make friends,” by Curtis Joseph. Jody Lee McKenzie Thacker was born on March 20, 1996, in Alexandria, Louisiana. His parents, Curtis and Cheryl Thacker were very excited to have another child. Their first child Jeremy, who was fourteen years of age, was very happy to have a little brother. Jody and his family have lived in Hicks, Louisiana for a long number of years. He currently goes to Hicks High School, where his mother graduated from. His dad, however, did not go to Hicks, but instead went to a high school in Georgia. Besides his dad, his other family members have went and graduated from Hicks.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zahak Response

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Iranian myth entitled: “Zahak, the Dragon King” taken from Firdawsi Shahnamehtell’s epic “The Book of Kings” tells us a story about the Persian throne. It begins with a summary of the situation; the ruler of Iran, Jamshid is a great leader who has brought numerous technological advancements, social structure, and health to the people of Iran until one rued day; called Na Ruz, when he tells nobles that they should bow to him for he is so great and his thriving kingdom falls to ruin. Next we are taken to a confrontation between Zahak, the son of Mardas, king of Arabs; a righteous just man who tended flock very well and gave help to whoever needed it, and Eblis a spirit of evil. Eblis coaxes Zahak into thinking that he is righteous and after a little push convinces Zahak that he his father does not deserve the throne and his blood must be shed., although when Zahak asks for instructions he is told that they will be received later. One night when Mardas is going to bathe in his vast garden he falls into a pit that Eblis dug and is “destroyed,” with the thought of his back stabbing son. From this point Zahak was leader and completely under the evil spirit’s control leading up to Eblis touching Zahak, vanishing, and reappearing as two snakes attached to Zahak’s shoulders that doctors cannot understand and that regrow after being cut. In the form of a doctor Eblis tells Zahak that to appease the snakes they must be fed two brains a day, and Zahak begins sacrificing men. We are then brought back to Jamshid, whose kingdom is in awry. His people decide that Zahak is their new king and both his armies combined. After giving Zahak his crown and throne Jamshid disappears for 100 years and upon his return is captured by Zahak and cut in half, creating a kingdom of evil under Zahak. Reigning for over a thousand years we are brought to a point where Zahak has a nightmare of three warriors assassinating him and gathers a group of wise men to tell him a…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clinical assessments have their place in almost every facet of the psychological and educational realms. I have been tracking down and examining what the most important aspects of assessment are that come into play in regard to drug and substance abuse, custody battles, as well as the importance the role of adhering to the ethical standards of utilizing culturally informed assessments. Clinical assessments within mental health centers are carry great importance in the identifying underlying behavioral problems, diagnosis, and treatment of patients. Behind every assessment is a clinician who carries great responsibility in maintaining professionalism and adhering to a strict code of ethical standards in order to maintain both their personal protection as well as the utmost priority of client protection.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Zaap Research Paper

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In middle school there was a cruel game we played called called ‘Zap.’ In this game a person would write on the top of your hand with marker word ‘zap’, on your palm they would write the name of a person who you were dared to “ask out.” It was a joke to make somebody humiliate themselves by asking the ugliest, nerdiest person out. Having your name written on the palm of somebody’s hand was the ultimate insult. As you might have guessed, I was many times the victim of the cruel joke and I knew why. The boys growing up would look at me like some sort of diseased animal and the girls would giggle and talk about me when I turned away. My self-esteem was always low and I’d always compare myself to other people. Even after I’ve grown into my nose…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethical Vigette

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Video presentation “Legal and Ethical Issues for Mental Health Professionals, Vol. 1: Confidentiality, Privilege, Reporting, and Duty to Warn,” (2010) explores true facts of various cases pertaining to abuse, some which are Supreme Court cases that dealt with mandating laws which require the duty to warn and report abuse and/or harm to the client within the counseling relationship. Conversations amongst a Supreme Court Justice leader, a clerk, and a legal assistant discuss and debate duties to report child abuse and terms of reasonable cause. Legal cases such as Tarasoff v. Board of Regents of the University of California are discussed in favor to laws that require the duty to warm when harm is clear and intended by a client. However, everything that is said or communicated by…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In section B.2.a code of ethics, it states that counselor is required to disclose information about a client, who disclose about harming themselves or others (ACA, 2014). In the state of Florida, Florida Statues Section 394.4615 (3)(a) (2016), states that if a patient states they want to harm a person, a counselor is able to release information to warn that individual who is being threatened of harm by the patient. If i determine if the client is a high risk and is a harm to herself, under the Florida Mental Health Act, as a Mental Health Counselor I would be able to Baker Act my client. Under the Florida Statue Section 394.463 (2)(f)(2014), when a client receives involuntary examination, a client is held up to 72 hours, and the only way the Baker Act can be released is by a physician or…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the California Supreme Court ruling involving the Tarasoff’s “duty to warn”, is if a patient reports hurting someone or themselves, the therapist has the obligation to inform the police, their (the patient’s) parents, relatives, or friends. Failing to inform the proper authorities might lead to getting seriously hurt or even killed, which, in the end can result in negative consequences. Highly publicized lawsuits can occur, claiming that the therapist did not follow the Tarasoff’s “duty to warn”. A therapist’s obligations under the law to serve and protect individual’s lives overrules the therapist-client confidentiality by the need to protect the…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Dual

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There are many difficult ethical decisions professionals in the field of psychology especially when in a therapist and or counseling position without crossing boundaries while avoiding dual relationships from forming. For example, a close friend of yours is having difficulty with her teenage daughter. She knows you are a psychologist who specializes in adolescents. She asks if you would be willing to see her daughter for a few sessions to straighten her out. Pope asks "What would each person consider the most ethical response?"The first problem given this scenario, there is already a dual relationship that is beginning because the therapist is a "close" friend of the client 's mother. In this way you can try to compensate for some of the distortion that may occur from seeing things only from your own perspective" (Pope & Vasquez, 2007). Everyone has their own personal beliefs regarding professional ethics and boundaries they draw. It is very important to assess each situation differently especially when in the field of psychology regarding patient 's confidentiality as well as following ethical codes as well as incorporating your personal ethics to ensure the most beneficial treatment.…

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper, I will discuss the principles that permit disclosure of protected health information with or without the patient’s consent for each of the four categories, government agencies, legal agencies or representatives and research groups. I will also state whether I feel privacy safeguards are adequate to support those principles.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Confidentiality is central to trust between doctors, medical team and patients. Patients have a right to expect that information about them will be held in confidence. The birth of the Hippocratic Oath in the fourth century started the responsibility of physicians to preserve the privacy and confidentiality of their patients. One of the provisions of the Oath lays the ethical foundation for the physician’s duty of confidentiality even beyond the circumstances of medical care. The Florence Nightingale Pledge, which was composed in 1893, was a modification of the “Hippocratic Oath,” a statement of the ethics and principles of the nursing profession. Included in the pledge is to hold in confidence all personal matters. Today we have the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which was passed by Congress in 1996. One of the regulations requires protection and confidential handling of protected health information. We also have the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) who takes an active role against potential violations in patient confidentiality (Oram M., 2008). This paper will consider the ethical implication of a breach of confidentiality with ethical principles. An alternative will be to address the dilemma in a clinical setting. Lastly, the author will address how an ethics committee might approach the dilemma using ethical principles, theories, and a team effort to ethical decision-making.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays