Tertullian’s On Idolatry (between A.D. 198 and 220) indicates that Christians could not conscientiously inflict the death penalty. This writing discussed the contributions to sin in certain jobs and trades. This includes the Roman military because the higher ranks in society used capital punishment. Tertullian mentioned that killing of any sort excluded military service as a livelihood for Christians. In On the Resurrection of the Flesh, he classified hangmen in the same category as lascivious women, gladiators and priests of a pagan …show more content…
A former president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops pointed out “the issue of capital punishment that involves both “profound legal and political questions” as well as "important moral and religious issues.”” This issue continues to influence public controversy and cause confusion on the topic.
In the writing the Evangelium Vitae, the concept of capital punishment is made acceptable under certain circumstances and allows for a more accepting view on it. Even though the Church’s view on capital punishment is a hard concept to grasp, the Church’s view is more against than it is for the death penalty. As the opinions of our societies continue to change, the Church has a difficult time keeping up with different ideologies and political influences on capital punishment.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church argues that if one’s life is at risk and there is no possible way to morally deal with the aggressor, then the defendant shall be able to defend themselves even if it includes the killing of another. In this situation the defendant should not receive any punishment because they had no other options in approaching the situation in a moral way. This demonstrates the shift in exceptions on capital punishment by coming to an agreement in which there is no punishment for people that have no other choice but to take ones life in order to save their