Preview

Terrorists' Justifications for Their Actions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
955 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Terrorists' Justifications for Their Actions
Terrorists’ Justifications for Their Actions
Alexandra C. Zuñiga
CJ290/ Terrorism
Mr. Scott Thompson
Kaplan College
12/13/2012

Abstract
Terrorists commit horrible acts of violence. They justify their actions with a wide range of reasons why the actions they carry out are “right.” Most terrorist organizations must convince themselves that the opponent is “evil.” Some commit terrorist acts against others in the name of their religion. An outcast believes that being an outcast in itself is his justification for joining a terrorist organization. There are many justifications for the actions and behavior of terrorists in their minds, but that is only in their minds; one person’s justification is called a “bad excuse” from someone else’s point of view.

Terrorists’ Justifications for Their Actions
Terrorists are human beings that commit terrible acts that in their own minds are justified. Their justifications vary from religion to their economical status to simply finding, “where they belong” within a terrorist organization. These justifications may not be accepted by the public eye; however, to a terrorist, the most important thing is to be able to justify his/her actions whether or not the reason for why they do what they do is accepted by others.
In the Name of Religion
Globalization is the world getting smaller. One of the things that make people and countries smaller, for example, is the internet. The internet is accessible to anyone who has a computer, a cell phone, or an internet cafe. Western values, including religious ideas and concepts, are thrust upon people in other cultures who did not know this even existed. The information posted by the internet is the initiation of “social and cultural changes…that constitute a dominant theme throughout human history,” (Alcorta, Phillips, and Sosis, 2012). Religious organizations have taken notice of the rapid cultural change. They grow to be most displeased of the changes and mockery for their religious



References: Sosis, R., Phillips, E. J., & Alcorta, C. S. (2012). Sacrifice and sacred values: Evolutionary perspectives on religious terrorism. (pp. 233-253). Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. (Vol. 22, pp. 664-670). American Sociological Review. White, J. R. (2011). Terrorism and homeland security. (7th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Pub Co.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “A terrorist is one who sows terror,” says Elshtain. She means that the victims of terrorist attacks are subjected to terror, or great fear. The purpose of subjecting a group of people to such fear varies but usually aims to destroy the morale of a people in its attempt at some religious, political, or ideological goal. Crucial features of inducing terror are its randomness and its attack on civilians as opposed to combatants. This elicits fear in every person because they are afraid for their personal safety in their day to day lives, as opposed to fearing only for our soldiers. To determine who is a terrorist, we must ask who they are attacking. Do they mainly target combatants in the field or bases, do they try to destroy military equipment and are they open to negotiations? If so, we should not label them terrorists for simply being enemy combatants. However, if they are deliberately targeting noncombatants with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible, they are clearly terrorists.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “Terrorism,” Michael Walzer describes terrorism as the indiscriminate murder of innocent people. He goes on to explain that terrorists have the objective of destroying the morale of a nation and instilling fear within a society by not targeting a specific group of people, but rather, targeting the population as a whole and killing “random” people. Walzer and many like-minded philosophers share the view that terrorism is wrong and is not justified under any circumstances; thus rendering it akin to murder. The preceding view is referred to as the “the dominant view,” as labeled by Lionel K. McPherson, because it is common to a great deal of people – many of who are not philosophers. McPherson attempts to discredit the notion that terrorism is wrong by relating it to modern warfare and showing the ways in which it is better in comparison. After reading the opposing arguments presented by Walzer and McPherson, I will be proving that although terrorism is not as immoral as war, it is still wrong.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Sykes, Gresham M. & Matza, David (1957) “Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency,” American Sociological Review 22 (December): 664-670…

    • 2738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre was the leader of The Committee of Public Safety during the radical phase of the french revolution. Robespierre played a big role in the Reign of Terror. Once a liberal thinker, he lost his belief in people. This caused him to become very radical in his actions (Justification for the Use of Terror (p. 1)). Hundreds of people were condemned to prison while others were executed, because they didn't agree with his beliefs. Were Maximilien Robespierre's efforts in the Reign of Terror justified, or were they entirely terroristic?…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Terrorists in the world have different goals, demands and the purpose. In the modern days,…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Terrorist Outlaw,” William McGurn argues that “terrorism is irredeemably evil.” Implicit in this claim is the belief that acts of terrorism are never justified.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lone Wolf Terrorism

    • 8850 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Juergensmeyer, M. (2000): Terror in the mind of God; the global rise of religious violence. University of California press. Los Angeles and Berkeley.…

    • 8850 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sosis, R., Phillips, E. J., & Alcorta, C. S. (2012). Sacrifice and sacred values: Evolutionary perspectives on religious terrorism. (pp. 233-253).…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Doerner, W., Thornton W., James, J. (1982). Delinquency and justice . University of Michigan: Scott Foresman. p271-283.…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin, G. (2010). Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspective, and Issues Third Edition. In G. Martin, Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspective, and Issues Third Edition (pp. 82-84). California: Sage Publication, Inc.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following is a brief explanation of the motivation of the Islamic Jihad Group. Included is a response to how the knowledge of the Islamic Jihad Group’s motivation might assist in planning counter terrorist strategy. Included are explanations as to how the motivations of terrorists differ from the motivations of other violent criminals and how cultural, socioeconomic, or political factors could lead a person to become a terrorist or criminal.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regoli, Robert M. and John D. Hewitt, Delinquency in Society. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000.…

    • 3578 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 25 ]. Brannan, David W., Esler, Philip F., and Strindberg, N. T. Anders. 2001. "Talking to "Terrorists": Towards an Independent Analytical Framework for the Study of Violent Substate Activism." Studies In Conflict & Terrorism 24, no. 1: 3-24…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following assignment outlines, research of several different sociological and/or psychological characteristics, which can influence new members to join terrorist organizations. Obviously, no single theory, can completely explain the motivation of terrorists. It appears as though a set of theories can come close to doing so sufficiently though, as they cover the cost-benefit calculation, psychological willingness to commit violence, and social conditions permissive to the growth of extremism, that underlie incidents of terrorist action (Simon, 2011).Often it comes…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The History of Terrorism

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Given the growing global threats of terrorism, it is significant that an understanding of the history, nature and mechanism-premises under which terror operates is obtained. This is significant as it would shape the perspective of policy makers when addressing issues of this nature. Terrorism, as it is understood is the action of none-state weak actors, individual or groups, who for some reasons feels suppressed, marginalized and, or denied what they may view as the basic human right. All terrorism has political objectives, even though the perpetrators may use religious relics to appeal to a wider existing audience, and invoke a response through violent act to prove or propagate their point. Yoram Schweitzer in "Suicide Terrorism Development &ump; Characteristics," Mark Sedgwick in "Al-Qaeda and the "Nature of Religious Terrorism," and Dr. James Armstrong, all demonstrates that suicide terror attacks are politically motivated even though the perpetrator may use religious symbolism to justifies their acts.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics