To begin, whether or not the narrator had a mental condition does not mean murder is an excusable crime; he still has to face the consequences for committing murder. In his point of view he is trying to cope with his mental condition but in reality he wasn’t. …show more content…
While this may be true, it fails to account for the lesson readers learn from the narrator’s crime that the criminal must face the consequences no matter how mentally ill they are because when criminals learn their lesson they realize they’re guilty for what they have done. In addition to the narrator did the right thing by confessing to the police because he didn’t lie to the police and just because he confessed doesn’t mean he’s going get away with murder he’s still guilty. Also every individual has a different point of view because in “The Tell Tale Heart” the narrator’s point of view he thought the old man’s eye was evil and in the old man’s point of view he thinks nothing wrong with his eye. As the narrator got obsessed over the old man’s eye he thought that killing him would make his eye stop bothering him. Still at first the narrator thought that he was coping with his mental condition but he really