Technology In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Technology have been the root of some of the most beneficial and also some of the most harmful creations throughout history. With something so influential, the question becomes whether creators of new technology should be responsible for the good or bad that this new technology creates. In the novel ‘’Frankenstein’’ Frankenstein is a scientist who brought a monster to life The use of technology used in this novel caused the monster to murder all of Frankenstein's friends and family, because of irresponsible behavior and not take care the monster he created. But in ‘’’Shading the Earth’’ the technology of the sun shades may stop global warming which potentially saved the earth. With the increase of technology ,there also comes with responsibility
…show more content…
And do not you fear the fierce vengeance of my arm wreaked on your miserable head? Begone, vile insect! Or rather, stay, that I may trample you to dust! And, oh! That I could, with the extinction of your miserable existence, restore those victims whom you have so diabolically murdered!" frankenstein is ridiculing the monster that he created and blaming him for all the deaths and trouble the monster has created.Instead of blaming the monster frankenstein should of taken responsibility and apologize and somehow fix the whole situation.’’He approached; his countenance bespoke bitter anguish, combined with disdain and malignity, while its unearthly ugliness rendered it almost too horrible for human eyes. But I scarcely observed this; rage and hatred had at first deprived me of utterance, and I recovered only to overwhelm him with words expressive of furious detestation and contempt.’’ if frankenstien can sense the anger and rage he should be one the one assessing the situation. Frankenstein in this situation is a father figure to the monster; Frankenstein created the monster therefore is the father of the monster. And as the father figure he should have the responsibility of teaching the monster of what is humane and what is not, because he …show more content…
‘’"Abhorred monster! Fiend that thou art! The tortures of hell are too mild a vengeance for thy crimes. Wretched devil! You reproach me with your creation, come on, then, that I may extinguish the spark which I so negligently bestowed." In the text frankenstein , the doctor frankenstein had the consequence of the death of his friends and family because he didn't take the responsibility of taking care of the monster.’’With carefully designed particles, geoengineers might make do with a fraction of that tonnage—though because they fall out of the stratosphere, the particles would have to be delivered continually, year after year. Still, says Caldeira, the sulfate scheme would be “essentially free compared with the other costs of mitigating climate change.” in the text of shading the earth comes with the consequence of the creation of technology that can help the stop of global warming.
Not only are there similarities there are also differences. One difference between the two text is that shading the earth came with technology that was positive, but in frankenstein there were no positives instead everyone frankenstein loves died because frankenstein did not live up to his responsibility of the creation of the monster.
Kunzig, Robert “Shading the Earth.” StudySync. Bookhead Learning 2017. Web. Fri. 5 May 2017.
Reagan, Ronald “Address to the nation on the explosion of
And do not you fear the fierce vengeance of my arm wreaked on your miserable head? Begone, vile insect! Or rather, stay, that I may trample you to dust! And, oh! That I could, with the extinction of your miserable existence, restore those victims whom you have so diabolically murdered!" frankenstein is ridiculing the monster that he created and blaming him for all the deaths and trouble the monster has created.Instead of blaming the monster frankenstein should of taken responsibility and apologize and somehow fix the whole situation.’’He approached; his countenance bespoke bitter anguish, combined with disdain and malignity, while its unearthly ugliness rendered it almost too horrible for human eyes. But I scarcely observed this; rage and hatred had at first deprived me of utterance, and I recovered only to overwhelm him with words expressive of furious detestation and contempt.’’ if frankenstien can sense the anger and rage he should be one the one assessing the situation. Frankenstein in this situation is a father figure to the monster; Frankenstein created the monster therefore is the father of the monster. And as the father figure he should have the responsibility of teaching the monster of what is humane and what is not, because he …show more content…
‘’"Abhorred monster! Fiend that thou art! The tortures of hell are too mild a vengeance for thy crimes. Wretched devil! You reproach me with your creation, come on, then, that I may extinguish the spark which I so negligently bestowed." In the text frankenstein , the doctor frankenstein had the consequence of the death of his friends and family because he didn't take the responsibility of taking care of the monster.’’With carefully designed particles, geoengineers might make do with a fraction of that tonnage—though because they fall out of the stratosphere, the particles would have to be delivered continually, year after year. Still, says Caldeira, the sulfate scheme would be “essentially free compared with the other costs of mitigating climate change.” in the text of shading the earth comes with the consequence of the creation of technology that can help the stop of global warming.
Not only are there similarities there are also differences. One difference between the two text is that shading the earth came with technology that was positive, but in frankenstein there were no positives instead everyone frankenstein loves died because frankenstein did not live up to his responsibility of the creation of the monster.
Kunzig, Robert “Shading the Earth.” StudySync. Bookhead Learning 2017. Web. Fri. 5 May 2017.
Reagan, Ronald “Address to the nation on the explosion of