Preview

Teaching Creationism in Schools

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Teaching Creationism in Schools
Teaching Creationism in Schools

The issue of teaching creationism in the public schools has long been debated. Over the years many different arguments have been made. First creationists tried to have the teaching of evolution outlawed. This issue went to the Supreme Court in 1968, where in _Epperson v. Arkansas_ the high court ruled against banning the teaching of evolution. Soon after this decision creationists began to call for 'equal time ', or the equal treatment of creation theory and evolution theory. When this attempt also failed creationists turned to 'creation science ' (Grunes 465). Today the major argument for the teaching of creationism in public schools is that creationism is a scientific theory and thus should be taught alongside evolution. The combatants against creationism being taught in public schools are those who believe creation science is bad science and those who believe it violates the separation of church and state. Supporters of creation science are organizations that are collectively referred to as the New Christian Right, such as the Institute for Creation Research. On the other hand, those who oppose creation science are usually scientists, educators, and civil liberties organizations (Grunes 466).

The majority of those people who desire for creationism to be taught in the public schools cite that it is scientific. They push for the teaching of creation science which is defined as "scientific evidence for creation and the inferences from that evidence" (Tatina 275). The inferences from that evidence are "sudden creation of the universe from nothing, recent formulation of the earth, creation of man and other biological kinds, a worldwide flood", and "the insufficiency of mutation and natural selection in bringing about development of living kinds from a single organism" (Grunes 470). These creation scientists, as they are called, want the teaching of the two scientific theories, evolution and creation science, to be taught side



Cited: Creation- Life Publishers, 1978. Ruse, Michael, ed Prometheus Books, 1988. Scott, Eugenie C 103.7 (July 1994):10-13. Tatina, Robert Teaching of Evolution & Creationism." _The American Biology Teacher_ 51.5 (May 1989):2750.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kitzmiller Study

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case of Kitzmiller versus Dover Area School District, the plaintiff Kitzmiller argued that the defendant, Dover Area School District, changed the curriculum of a biology course on the theory of evolution to intelligent design, which is a form of creationism. The defendants tried to deny that Intelligent Design a form of creationism but a form of true science. On the topic of scientific world view, further examination will take place on how science is democratic, how illegitimate forms of argumentation take place in this case and how intelligent design is a pseudoscience.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    “There are none who are as deaf as those who do not want to hear,” Barry Leventhal once said this quote (Geisler and Turek). There are so many different creation theories that people have been talking about them for centuries, none have been one hundred percent proven but all are debatable. The problem with most professionals who study creation theories is they are very stubborn. Once somebody has a plausible theory in their head they do not listen to any other theories. This quote by Barry Leventhal perfectly describes this characteristic of the professionals mentioned earlier. They are “deaf” because they refused to hear what others had to say. Many documents were written by these “deaf” professionals about their adopted theory; they…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Given the many battlefields that exist in America’s Culture War on public education, the main focus will be on the contemporary battlefront in the debate to include Intelligent Design in the public schools’ science curriculum. From the vast amounts of information that exists on this topic alone, it is important to define ID, identify the polar opponents, and understand a brief view of their core issues.…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    A seemingly endless debate continues over the legitimacy of teaching evolutionary theory in classrooms, particularly in communities where religion plays a prominent role in community life. Some church leaders, teachers and school board members argue that alternate explanations provided by creationists or proponents of intelligent design should be taught alongside those of evolutionary theorists in science classrooms. People who are proponents of evolutionary theory are quick to offer a retort, usually suggesting that evolution is a proven fact; while denouncing the two aforementioned opposing views as belief systems which cannot be subjected to scientific analysis. Therefore, they suggest, such views are not appropriate subjects for science classrooms.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Magner, L (2001). Evolution and Creationism in American Public Schools. Science and Its Time, Retrieved March 24, 2008, from http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itweb/omah25471…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The study of evolution is the theory of history on this earth. Evolution teaches that humans have evolved over time from animals that live on earth. The Merriam-Webster’s dictionary gives the definition that it is "a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations..." Now this relates to creation vs. evolution because some people feel this is one hundred percent the truth and right. Some people believe that God does not exist and that this is more scientific and factual proof that this is how humans came to be on this earth. To support their argument in 1963 there was a case held by the Supreme Court called Murray vs. Cutlet. This case which ruled in the favor of the evolutionist stating that reading the Bible in class, praying and the teaching of creation where un constructional and they were taken out of schools. So the end result was no more teaching of creation.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Young Earth

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many scientists and creationist are Bible believing Christian like Isaac Newton, Edward Blyth, Kurt Wise, and Inn Taylor who is the president of creation research Family Radio, Oakland, CA and host of others who believe in a literal Genesis as the word of God which is accurate and without any error, also agreed with Genesis that God created the heaven and the earth in 6 days, 24 hours and no other wise like millions or billions as evolutionist perceived. The Bible is the truth word of God. “Sanctify them by the truth; your word is truth.” 2 The web site www.answersingenesis.org explained many questions and misconception that one may have about Genesis…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution which states that mankind has descended from a lower order of animals (Censorship in Schools, IV, 4), contradicts with the basis of our government. The United States government is based on the bible. Therefore, if you take into consideration this idea that the U.S. government is based on the bible, teaching evolution to our students undermines the foundation of our government. However, Charles Darwin only crated a theory. We encourage our students to think outside the box. Creative thinking is a key process in developing any new idea. It is contradictory to refuse to teach a theory about evolution, while also encouraging student to come up with new theories of their own. The case of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes where Scopes was arrested for teaching evolution in Dayton, Tennessee 1925 is the most studied case when it comes to the teaching of evolution. (Herndon 8). John Scopes was arrested for teaching Darwin’s Theory of evolution, which was against Tennessee law at the time. There are many opinions as to whether the case was a victory for either side, but the fact of the matter is that the information was now out and being talked about. A more recent case is McClean v. Arkansas which made it clear that in Arkansas, “Balanced Treatment” is to be used when teaching either evolutionary science or creation science. (Herndon 9). That is that if a teacher decides to teach either evolutionary or…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though some states do teach both and very few teach how evolution is wrong, the majority of public school students in the US are taught evolution. Creation is a belief and evolution is a scientific theory. Different published works will say contrasting things about this controversy and how well, scientifically speaking the two sides stack against each other. Neither creation nor evolution can be proven using the scientific method because they can’t be tested. All that is left to do is take the evidence left by both sides and compare them to how well they fit into the science and history of the…

    • 3363 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While extreme creationists continuously push for only the teaching of creationism instead of evolution in classrooms, others claim that both models should be objectively taught. Creation scientist and American Christian Henry M. Morris, founder of the Institution for Creation Research and the “father of modern creation science”, is one representative of this group (Morris). Like other creationists, he does not support evolution for a countless number of reasons, including that it is not a scientific fact, theory, or hypothesis; it is merely a belief and nothing more. However, Morris suggests that neither evolution nor creationism can be proven or tested, meaning that no one can prove one idea over the other. Therefore, he says both models of creation should be unbiasedly taught in classrooms along with pros and cons of each side.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Darwin would be happy to discover that 150 years after the publication of “On the Origin of Species,” the scientific community remains convinced about evolution—not only on the basis of the evidence he cited, but also based on evidence from sources he could not have dreamed of. But he would not be happy to learn that almost half of the American population do not accept evolution. Moreover, he would be downright dismayed to know that a group of creationists has devised a minimalist form of Creationism—dubbed "Intelligent Design"—in the hope of evading the constitutional barrier to teaching creationism in public schools. I am suspicious about the design-type idea not only due to the fact that ID derives from creationism, but also because of the faulty way its proponents develop their arguments.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Teaching creationism with science is a disservice to students because creationism has no empirical evidence to support the doctrines in the bible. The beliefs of a creationist view its doctrine that an omnipotent creator creates all things, but it is a disservice to students since there is no evidence. Krauss expresses how science can offer a better world by telling the truth on the age of the earth evidently shown on evolution (a change inherited characteristics of biological population over successive generation). Krauss stated (2013a) if parents or teachers "withhold knowledge or do anything to children to put competitive disadvantage as adults is mild child abuse”. This context explains the disservice of creationism with science; due to religious education it withholds the knowledge of expressing the facts. Krauss (2013a)…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been an on going debate about creation and evolution for hundreds of years and there is multiple sides to each debate. I agree with the bible that we were created by God. Some of the following facts support my belief that creationism is more realistic than evolution.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creationism In Classroom

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The debate concerning the teaching of creationism in public science classrooms has been raging for decades. This idea is contentious due to the strong religious convictions of its advocates and the equally fervent rationalism that opposes it. Creationism is a doctrine based in faith, and as such cannot be summarily proven or disproven with empirical and reproducible evidence. There is, however, a place for Creationism in the public school system. Creationism has no place in the science curriculum within the public education system, but it can be covered in a humanities course to investigate the distinctions between theology, philosophy, and science.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays