Preview

Tacitus the Burning of Rome

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tacitus the Burning of Rome
Tacitus’ The Burning of Rome Tacitus’ “The Burning of Rome” translated by George Gilbert Ramsay shows its significance, style, and beliefs of the burning of Rome. A large portion of Ancient Rome flares during the Emperor Nero 's reign. Rather than rebuild the city to it 's old plan, Nero built a gigantic palace where the burned buildings had been. Rumors were told that Nero started the fire. To put an end therefore to this rumor, he shifted the charge onto others, and inflicted the most cruel tortures upon a body of men detested for their abominations, and popularly known by the name of Christians (Ramsay 327).
The significance of Ancient Rome limit was placed to the height of houses; open spaces were left; and colonnades were added to protect the fronts of tenements, Nero undertaking to build these at his own cost, and to hand over the building sites, cleared of rubbish, to the proprietors (327). He offered premiums and he assigned the marshes at Ostia for the reception of the rubbish, which was taken down the Tiber in the same vessels, which had brought up the corn. But a devastating fire burns down the city before Nero came. At this moment, people were suffering from the fire and blamed Nero for starting this. But Nero promised to give land and establish buildings in order to magnify his name. This event is outrages and slaughters that were part of Ancient Rome.
The author’s style in Title of Burning of Rome is impassionate. His style is more traditional such as the writing being superior, and having reasonable expressions. It shows the process of adding details with mental images of what the author is writing. Something ambiguous in the story would be “And now came a calamitous fire—whether it was accidental or purposely contrived by the Emperor remains uncertain for on this point authorities are divided—more violent and destructive than any that ever befell our city.” (323-324). It could be ambiguous because it doesn’t have the accurate detail of who



Cited: Page Tacitus, Publius C. The Burning of Rome. Trans. George Gilbert Ramsay. Elements of Literature. Ed. Patricia Mcambridge. Austin: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 2006. Print. 321-27.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ancient philosophers and historians often created narrative textual pieces in order to make sense of their surrounding environments and their connection to history. These stories were not often considered to be historically accurate but rather reasonably plausible accounts. Plutarch accounts the way in which he believed that Rome was built under the leadership of Romulus in order to establish a created history for the city. The Romans valued these accounts because they desired an understanding for societal aspects that lacked a sense of contextual meaning. Plutarch writes that after Romulus buried his brother Remus, he enlisted men from Etruria to aid in digging a circular pit around what is known as the “Comitium.” In this pit they placed the “first fruits of all things whose use is thought good by custom and necessary by nature.” Then all the men mixed soils from their native lands in the pit, which they then named the “mundus.” Plutarch explains that this process was outlined in “certain sacred laws and writings” that the men from Etruria taught to Romulus in a way that was similar to a “religious ritual.” This example gives a meaning to the way in which the founders of Rome established a central point around which they drew boundaries for the city. Without this created history, Rome’s placement could be analyzed as entirely arbitrary. Plutarch explains the manner in which the founders employed a bull and cow to drag a plow with a bronze blade to create a groove in the earth that marked the placement of the city’s walls. He continues by writing that the plow was lifted off the ground wherever a gate would be placed instead of wall, thus designating that only the walls would be considered sacred. Plutarch writes, “For if they…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin, Document F states, “The population of Rome decreased from a milion people, to 250,000.” How did this happen? It was no other than a case of the measles, which is classified as a natural disaster. Natural disasters were the most harmful casualty to occur in Rome because no one in that time could prediction when they…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cincinnatus: A Roman Hero

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cincinnatus was a Roman Hero. Cincinnatus lived from the early 6th century BCE into the late 5th century BCE. Cincinnatus was a consul and a Roman patrician. Cincinnatus had a son, named Caeso and he committed a crime. Caeso was put on trial, was found guilty and his punishment was death. Cincinnatus used his power and influence to make a deal with the government. Cincinnatus’ family would leave Rome for their son to be saved. Cincinnatus’ family lived in a farm for a couple years. In those years, nearby tribes called the Aequi and Volscians teamed up to attack Rome. The war lasted for about two years and it was very intense. Rome was losing this war and they wanted to appoint Cincinnatus as a temporary dictator. They sent a messenger to…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Respond to the following statement, “What were the primary reasons for the fall of Rome?”…

    • 431 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people have come to the conclusion that Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome. They have come to this conclusion based on the fact that he was not there at the time to ignite the fire. Also he had witnesses who saw where he was at the time of the fire. Being that Nero was disliked, he was framed for a fire that started accidentally. Many myths about Nero circulated about him being the one who started the fire which accredited to his bad reputation. Nero did not start the Great Fire of Rome because he was not present during the time the fire started, myths were started about him, and was framed for the fire because he was disliked.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: The History of Rome by Titus Livius. Translated from the Original with Notes and Illustrations by George Baker, A.M.. First American, from the Last London Edition, in Six Volumes (New York: Peter A. Mesier et al., 1823). Retrieved from: http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=170&Itemid=27…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: The Rise Of Rome

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Roman Empire, one of the biggest empires of the ancient world, was a strong and growing empire. However, it fell after many years of glory. Why did it fall? Was it because of attacks, failing economy, many unemployed? These all lead to one point, expansion. Or was it struggles over power? Even though the Roman Empire got more land, resources, and labor from expanding, the expansion led to the thinning out of resources and power, as well as a failing economy due to unemployed plebeians; lastly Rome’s defenses were weakened.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When examining events in the distant past, it is good to keep in mind that our frequently sparse and incomplete records were written by individuals who were often more interested in their current political situations than the actual facts . Such is undoubtedly the case with the authors of the only primary texts recording the events surrounding Boudicca’s rebellion: Tacitus and Cassius Dio. Tacitus, for example, was more interested in his political agenda when writing the Agricola than when writing the Annals . Writing 40-50 years after the rebellion, he likely had detailed knowledge of the facts since his father in law was a soldier serving in Roman Britain , but he went to pains to paint Boudicca as a character who almost uniquely stood up to the Emperor Nero . His account seems to be less focused on the actual events than it was on the political climate in Rome and the author’s opinion of women in leadership . Cassius Dio’s account is also questionable since he wrote it in the early 3rd century AD and the only remaining copy is an abbreviated version missing much of the original detail . Dio’s opinion of Boudicca is clear: he felt that Rome was shamed by the fact that a woman could wreak disaster in one of its provinces . The matter is further complicated by the fact that there is very little overlap in the works of the two…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Catacombs

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The catacombs that were found in Rome were due in part that there was a law that prohibited the burial of people within city limits. Before the catacombs were used by the Romans, they were Pagans and practiced cremation but later became Christians. The Christians had the faith of using catacombs to bury the dead. The early catacombs were made for the Jewish people that lived within Rome. Most of the first catacombs found in Rome belong to private land and others were given permission to bury the relatives there. Most of these catacombs started to be used in the Antonines Age.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire and Nero

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Seneca was the personal advisor of Nero during his reign. He was a stoic philosopher who played a vital role in the running of the empire. Seneca contributed in many aspects of Nero’s reign by introducing reforms, bringing stoicism into practice and playing a key role in the senate. Seneca aided in important decision-making. He led Nero down an appropriate path, particularly when Nero became extremely erratic. He served Nero well and made an excellent contribution during his reign.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The History of Tacitus

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    history is a branch of literature. It is colourful, vivid. It has to read well.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After a century of civil wars and wide-spread fear and chaos, a new and promising leader arose, who, despite his comparably humble origins was soon to be called Augustus, the revered one, by the Senators. This once, dominant body placed hope in this single man and bestowed numerable honours upon him, concentrating the power of patronage and promotion through which he eventually outranked all the other Senators in the state.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ulius Caesar hid from the world, so that no one else would find out that he was still alive. He found this hard though. He wanted to destroy the people that killed him the first time and become dictator again. He resisted though.Would he want to show himself again? All the fighting started with him stealing from Bacchus’s palace, Bacchus’s palace was now hidden in the skies. Vulcan continued to make weapons, but his wound would never heal. It never will kill him though. It would only inflict pain to him forever!…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome and Tacitus

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Germania, written by Roman author Tacitus around the turn of the 1st century A.D. is an interesting work on the tribes that made up the nation of Germany at the time of the writing. Thomas Gordon, in the introductory note of his translation of Germania, says that Tacitus “stands in the front rank of the historians of antiquity for the accuracy of his learning, the fairness of his judgments”. In terms of the accuracy of his writing, I will admit, Germania is an incredibly detailed piece of work for one so old and I have no doubt that it is an invaluable source of historical information; however, in terms of the fairness of his judgements, I have a hard time believing that Tacitus is completely objective here. The strange thing about this essay is that he is not describing the Germans completely negatively, but rather comparing them as sometimes living a simpler, more pure lifestyle than his more excessive modern Roman contemporaries. That said, Tacitus does portray Germans as fairly barbaric and seems to focus on their warlike tendencies. This essay will briefly examine how Tacitus frames the positive and negative aspects of the Germans and how he uses their portrayal to comment on Rome of the time.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays