Over 400 dreams were recorded and, for this book, Jung focuses on three that were related to religion. He argues that Freud's interpretation of dreams was incorrect in that Jung feels the dream is its own interpretation. One particular dream focuses on entering a Catholic church and having a conversation with a prophetic woman. Jung explains the opposing forces, the anima/animus, in each human and reveals that this woman is the patient's expression of his own anima side. The dream expresses a compromise in the patient's life between Catholicism and paganism. Jung concludes that this initial dream was reflective of his patient's desire to repair the lack of religion in his life and combat the worldliness that had taken its place.
In the second chapter, Dogma and Natural Symbols, Jung focuses on the second dream and begins to discuss the significance of symbols, or rather archetypes, in the collective unconscious to their representations within the concept of religion. Jung reveals his own beliefs concerning the religious symbols of the day. This dream contained such symbols as an ape being reconstructed, four fiery points (quaternity symbol) and an old man. Jung understood the ape to be representative of the patient seeking refuge from his uncontrollable unconscious. The fiery points symbolize "fullness of life as the only legitimate source of religion," and the old man was a symbol of religious authority. Other dogmatic symbols such as the Cross and the Trinity are explained as personal, yet scientific experiences and it is noted that they are typically congruent among different religions. In the unconscious mind, Jung believes that all of these religious symbols unify into "the God within" and it is this symbol in itself that is enforced by the unconscious mind. This is congruous with Jung's Analytic Psychology theory in that a major theme is the search for unity in the self.
The third chapter, The History and Psychology of a Natural Symbol, focuses on how a symbol comes to be and the reasons for it appearing and reappearing in religion. The third dream contained many symbols, colors and numbers that appeared in differing forms and in various sequences of the dream. Jung dissects each symbol and its origin and relates it to his patient's need for "sublime harmony" as a scientific understanding of this third dream. The lectures end with a conclusion clarifying that the human mind entertains such symbols, in relation to their religious significance, in its unconscious during the search for unity, and that religion is an absolute; a personal experience in both the conscious and unconscious of a person's mind.
Carl Jung asserts his own belief system concerning religion in these lectures. Although he makes it clear that the explanations are scientific and that he is sympathetic to all beliefs, this book is essentially a record of his views involving how the human mind connects to the idea of religion. His theory seems sound to the extent that it could only be justified and proven by his own standards. Jung even says that religion is a personal experience, so how is it possible that this theory of religion relating to psychology could be tested against anyone but Carl Jung himself? I believe his ideas concerning the deciphering of symbols were extraordinary, given the inclusion of supplemental information. The amount of thorough research dating back thousands of years proved to me that his theory regarding dogmatic symbols and their meanings in the three dreams is sound. I also felt that his description of the anima/animus in relation to the characters that appeared in the dreams was a strong and credible point. It would have been beneficial to me to have read a more solid explanation of Jung's description of religion as a concrete concept and not as a product of his own abstract thought processes.
I encountered a number of difficulties in reading this book. I chose to read it based on my initial excitement of understanding how psychology and religion are related according to Jung. However, I found that Jung's thoughts, as I understood them, were disorganized and I often found myself having to turn several pages back just to find the place where one of his tangents originated so that I could get back on track. This book was a challenge to follow, and I believe it could be a more beneficial read if the numerous Latin phrases were translated in an easily accessible fashion. I would have benefited more from examples that did not solely rely on the three dreams of one particular patient, and if given the opportunity, I would question Carl Jung about the meaning of such religious symbols in a broader context. It was a positive experience in that it helped me to relate, and further understand, several concepts to the Jungian study from class. I'm glad for the knowledge I gained regarding Jung's connections between psychology, religion and the unconscious mind, but I finished the book wishing for a more sound and applicable argument relating these points to each other.
A Synopsis of "Psychology and Religion" by C.G. Jung Jung, C.G. (1937). Psychology and Religion. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In today's society, education is more liberal, allowing people to think for themselves and providing them with a broader education. This differs from many years ago, when education was more conservative. Education was very basic, consisting of only academic classes and no electives. People with a more conservative education would never go against what they were taught. However, liberally educated people of today can go against what they are taught, research it themselves, and make new conclusions about their studies. A liberal education enables people to deal with the forces that control their life. It frees them from the restraints in everyday life. Having such a broad education allows people to deal with such forces. Four psychologists have written essays and constructed theories that can agree that liberal education is of a greater stature than conservatively educated. The essays are "The Theory of Multiple Intelligences," written by Howard Gardner, "The Personal and Collective Unconscious," written by Carl Jung, "The Allegory of the Cave," written by Plato, and "From the Interpretation of Dreams," written by Sigmund Freud.…
- 1152 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In his book Future of an Illusion, Sigmund Freud critique uses his method of psychoanalysis on religion. By comparing the relationship between human and religion to that of a child and his parents Freud effectively demonstrates that religion is a product of the human mind. After exposing religion as a an illusion Freud concludes that humanity will be better off when it has forgone religion. This paper will argue that Freud's assertion that religion is an illusion is correct because of it's blatantly traceable evolution through the history of the human civilization and psyche.…
- 1770 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Cited: Carter, J. N. (1979). The Intergrationof psychology and theology:An Introduction . Grand Rapids: Zondervan.…
- 1370 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
S. Freud’s The Future Illusion and P. Tillich’s Religion as a Dimension in Man’s Spiritual Life carry on about an important question of what religion really is, what is its meaning in a cultural, psychological and scientific aspect and how it relates to a society and an individual. In this paper I will try to prove through an analysis and comparison of both texts that although their approach to the subject is different they both regard religion as an important aspect of human life. Freud in Illusion touches on things that to some may be an unquestionable truths; a meaning of life, a reason to be a good citizen - a good human being. Freud strips religion of its “holiness” but not of its power over a culture and a human life. He argues that religion in its essence is nothing more than an illusion - a wishful thinking based on a subconscious hope for a reward (the afterlife). According to Freud, religion is an aspect of culture - civilization, defending us against nature and each other. Civilization is a necessity that was socially constructed in order to explain and control the unknown and scary forces of the world but more importantly to cage our primal desires of: incest, murder, cannibalism which lay deeply in our unconscious. Therefore, to save humanity civilization created laws. At first the forces of nature were given human characteristics to make the assimilation easier and simpler to comprehend. The so called totemism was clear and understandable serving a purpose of control and protection from the environment and ourselves. But who would obey the laws if there was no fear of punishment for doing wrong and a reward for doing good. That is when religion came in handy.…
- 1122 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Among Freud, Jung, and Adler, Freud is indisputably the most towering monolith. It was Freud's pioneering use of the term "the I" "das Ich" in his native German, which was then translated into the Latin "ego" that brought "ego" into common parlance and popular interest to the process of self-consciousness. Adler's school of psychology, which he called "Individual Psychology," was based on the idea of the indivisibility of the personality. His most significant divergence from Freud's premises was his belief that it was crucial to view the human being as a whole not as a conglomeration of mechanisms, drives or dynamic parts. And in contrast to most psychological thinking of the time, Adler believed that, fundamentally, human beings are self-determined.…
- 1022 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Have you ever wondered why you get along with your best friends? Or maybe you are dying to know why some coworkers get under your skin. Perhaps you are frustrated with routinely quarreling with your cousins. Well, once I discovered my personality type and how it relates to other types, I learned that many of our social conflicts are derived from each person's unique perception of the world.…
- 1421 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This was a fascinating video that touched on an array of topics related to dreams and the psyche. One of the things that I noted while watching the video was that Carl Jung wrote on the beginnings of Zen in Buddhism and studied Native American culture in his work. It was also interesting the thoughts that Jung had about the psyche. In the beginning of the video Jung discussed that the psyche is the “great danger”. The video went on to discuss the psychology of war, architecture, alcohol and drug addiction, death, and movies. The video stated that movies were an effective way to portray archetypes. John Beebe, a Jungian psychologist, tackles movies and movie stars in the video. He states that archetypes in movies are “a ticket of admission to…
- 486 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Freud was a neurologist and is known as the founding father of psychoanalysis. Freud believed that religion is used as a protective system that man should ‘disregard in its relation to reality’. Freud saw to origins of religious belief lying with primitive tribes. The tension between the dominant male and the subordinate males (sons) culminates to over throw the father (this is a manifestation of the Oedipus complex). However, the guilt that the son then feels because of this is alleviated only by worshiping his father. The super-ego (the part of your subconscious that encourages you to act morally it represses anti-social impulses such as killing, and by inducing fear and guilt, it is crucial for civilisation) then takes the place of the father as a source of internalised authority, which is derived from the family, education and Church. God is a father substitute and a projection of the super-ego. Freud believed that man is dependent on religion to ‘make his helplessness tolerable’ and whilst he maintained this dependency he could never truly be happy. Freud realised that a feeling of helplessness in the face of external dangers, inner impulses and death and society, were at the route of religion. He observed that many religious rituals were similar to obsessive rituals. These are to protect the ego (the more primal part of your subconscious) from fantasies, desires and especially sexual impulses which, are normally repressed.…
- 1054 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Jung’s understanding of religion is solemnly based on his individual perception of psychology, in order for one to understand his theory it is essential to acknowledge key features. To begin with Jung argued the libido which is said to be the main cause of neuroses is where psychic energy is produced, the energy is needed for the work of our personality to be performed efficiently, opposing to what Freud defines as a sexual drive essential to be released. This indicates Jung views religion as something of a deeper meaning and holds a lot more value to be classed as something created due to our supposedly guilty sexual desires.…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Just as the title describes, Entwistle explains within the book the attempts and varied approaches of integrating both psychology and Christianity, two entities which seem to have been at odds with each other since the time of Galileo. By explaining key historical conflicts, such as instances of friction between religion and science, readers are able to understand how psychology and Christianity are intertwined, and how the same principles that hold them together also seek to push them apart. As said best by Entwistle, “The interaction of psychology and theology is virtually inevitable due to their mutual interest in understanding the ambiguities and mysteries of human behavior, and healing human brokenness.” (Entwistle, 2010, p.51)…
- 1324 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
David Entwistle's (2010) Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity appears to be a text with a primary audience which appears to be conservative evangelical Christians. The basic ‘meat’ of the book is the premise that "weaving together perspectives from psychology and Christian theology can help us understand and appreciate humanity more fully than we could with either perspective alone" (p. 3). Entwistle’s view is that in faithful reading of both the book of God's work (nature) and the book of God's word (theology), this textbook seems to be the work of an individual whose true request is for a form of psychology that is aimed at the treatment of the total patient, mind, body and soul. "Christian understandings of personhood, the purpose of human life, our need for God, and the ethical teachings of Christian faith," Entwistle argues, "are integral to psychology, not merely parallel to it" (p. 199). By making his opinion clear throughout several sections within the text Entwistle is projecting his position on the subject of integrating theology and psychology very clear.…
- 1321 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
an introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.…
- 1418 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Hood, R. W. Jr. (1999, November). American Psychology of Religion and the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Freud argues that religion is a symptom of collective neurosis, which is a mental imbalance of the Id, ego and superego. This is definitely a negative view as Freud is suggesting that all religious people are suffering from a mental imbalance and that is the only reason they believe in religion. Freud saw a link between his patients that were suffering from neurosis and religious people. For example he saw ritualised behaviour in neurotic’s methodical washing of hands and in religious people genuflecting.…
- 571 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In regards to Freud’s view of religion as being a neurosis, Carl Jung commented in a…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays