Should Shylock be shown pity or did he deserve how he was treated? Ever since Shylock was shown as a character by William Shakespeare in the Merchant of Venice there have been many interpretations about him all throughout history. Some of these opinions are of the time are biased. Even different groups of people throughout the centuries have a different point of view about this man.
In the 19th century (Elizabethan times) Shylock had been portrayed by Shakespeare an outcast, both as a villain and a clown. This was believable to his audience because at the time Jews were persecuted as a lower class in society and isolated. They would of have a much simpler view that Christians were always more intelligent. There were not really any Jews living in England at this time. However, society has changed throughout the centuries, where different religions, race, etc., are no longer discriminated against, and Shylock in the modern day world may be seen as a victim.
Set in Venice, the most important trading centre in the world in Shakespeare’s time. The Jews were segregated from living alongside the Christians and under curfew for their movements at night. They were easily identified by the different clothes they wore. Many were moneylenders who charged interest for the privilege; this was considered to be a sin by Christians, who despised them for it.
Shylock, a devout Jew and moneylender, had always received ill-treatment from Christians. He appears to the audience in Act 1 Scene 3 when Bassanio and Antonio ask for the loan of 3,000 ducats. Firstly, we learn of his hatred for Christians and that of Antonio.
"I hate him for he is a Christian; / But more, for that in low simplicity / He lends out money gratis." (Act 1, Scene iii)
Shylock has the upper hand and is in control. The deviousness and slyness of his character is shown, the money is given through friendship, a bond but with the twisted element of not interest, but a ‘pound of a man’s flesh’ - Antonio’s. On the other hand, you could look at the act of revenge as understandable. In the past Antonio has spat on him, called him a dog and when reminded says to Shylock:
“I am as like to call thee so again, / To spit on thee again.” (Act 1, Scene iii)
He takes away his profit by paying others debts. Now he wants to borrow money from him. Shakespeare may have wanted to show his audience how hypocritical people can be, just using them for their own gain with disrespect. Or did they see just evil in Shylock? Let us look further.
His daughter Jessica and his servant Launcelot both desert him. Why would both of them want to leave? Launcelot jokes:
“I should stay with the Jew my master, / who God bless the mark, is a kind of devil.” (Act 2, Scene ii)
Jessica is ashamed to be her father’s child. She wishes to disown her faith and elopes with Lorenzo, a close friend of Antonio, stealing both his money and jewels, on the night the Christians invite him to diner. So the Christians have not only deceived him but betrayed his trust. Did she just want to leave as she knew her father would never give her blessing to love a Christian? One reason she may have wanted to leave is because they feel that money means more to him than anything else not her happiness. As Shylock is reported to scream:
“My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter! …..” (Act 2, Scene viii)
It seems Shakespeare would have us believe it is his wealth as later Shylock wishes his daughter were dead at his feet with all his money and all the jewels she has stolen.
Nevertheless, we do see a more human side to Shylock, in Act 3 Scene i, his speech “……..Hath not a Jew eyes? ……….” in which he recounts all the times when Antonio and friends insulted him and tells that a Jew is like any man, he feels the same things. Also, that revenge is a human trait not just for Christians, so why shouldn’t a Jew do the same. Another time we see the feeling side of him is of his sentimentality of his wife’s ring which Jessica has traded.
"… I had it of Leah when I was a bachelor: / I would not have given it for a wilderness of monkeys” (Act 3, Scene i)
Lastly, in the trial scene is when we see Shylock at his most murderous but then scolded. Shylock insists:
“The pound of flesh, which I demand of him, / Is dearly bought ‘tis mine and I will have it.” (Act 4, Scene i)
Despite pleads from the Duke, Bassino and Portia for pity on Antonio’s life Shylock insists on his pound of flesh. Furthermore, he will not show any mercy,
“On what compulsion must I? tell me that.” (Act 4, Scene i)
If he had he would be morally superior to Antonio. The audience is no longer on the side of Shylock. Shakespeare dramatically changes the plot when the bond is undone by Portia. The punishments Shylock receives are extremely cruel and severe; would they have been so cruel if he had been Christian? His wealth is distributed amongst his enemies. Finally, Antonio forces him to pay the ultimate humility of converting to Christianity. However, the Christians probably thought at that time that they were not merciless in sparing his life.
In my opinion, I do sympathise with Shylock. He may have been filled with hatred, vengeance, and murderous towards Antonio but who has made him this way? Shylock is a victim of circumstance. He has been discriminated against for being a Jew; he has suffered repeated abuse, ultimate humiliation from Antonio and his friends; he has lost his family and he has lost all of his possessions and wealth. The one thing he had left was his faith and they took that too.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Both Shylock and Antonio are racially biased and they both put down each other. Shylock claims to be victimized by Christians; however, he exploits Christians in business matters. Antonio persecutes Shylock because he is a Jew. Shylock wants to take revenge against Antonio and despises him for being a Christian: "If a Jew wrong a Christian, what is his humility? Revenge. If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge. The villainy you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction." (3.1. 64-69).…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
There are quite a few reasons for Shylock being a villain in my opinion supported by text from the play. Firstly, near the beginning of the play, Shylock has a chance to take against the Christians when Bassanio (a Christian) wants to borrow three thousand ducats off Shylock (a money lender). Antonio, (also a Christian), his friend is prepared to do the deal as he is the only one who will be able to pay the money back. Shylock agrees with the deal, but then slyly comes up with a bond that said if Antonio could not pay his money back in time; one pound of his flesh could be cut off. ‘Of your fair flesh, to be cut off’ is quite a horrible deal which shows some of the villainy side to Shylock. It is just the way of thinking that is quite disgusting from Shylock. Another point is that when his daughter, Jessica leaves him, he says ‘I would my daughter dead at my foot’. I think this shows that he is a bad father, saying that he wants his daughter dead where he can see it. If he was a good and caring father he would try to find her and resolve it between them. He should be upset on losing her instead of getting angry at her for leaving him. From that, it also shows us that he doesn’t love his daughter that much. As she also takes some of his money, he finishes the last quote with ‘and the jewels in her ear’. When he says this, it makes you think that Shylock cares about…
- 453 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare illustrates his feelings towards Jews in 17th century England through the use of a commonly known stereotype during the time, the racial tension between Jews and Christians. Shylock is the focal point of the play, and acts as the traditional stereotype of the Jew in Elizabethan times. The merchant of venice is often seen as an anti-semitic work due to the stereotypical portrayal of the jewish character shylock. Some would argue that the most inevitable interpretation of shylock as a miserly wretch who care for nothing but his money is shakespeare expressing now – unfashionable anti-jewish views. However , one must remember that this view was seen as entirley normal and acceptable at the time, and most of the jews of elizabethan england had stoicly accepted such treatment.…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play The Merchant of Venice Shylock, a rich Jewish moneylender in Venice agrees to loan Bassanio three thousand ducats on Antonio’s guarantee. Shylock is made to be the villain in the Merchant of Venice because of some of the things he does. But even though he may not have been the only one in the wrong, he is still guilty of the deadly sins of, avarice, envy, and wrath.…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Discrimination and hatred across religions can be often become a normal part of everyday life, and can be difficult to eradicate and extinguish. In William Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice, the idea of the “normality” of everyday prejudices comes across in interactions and the portrayal of Shylock, a Jewish moneylender in Venice. Through Shylock’s character, Shakespeare provides a commentary on how his society has viewed Judaism in a dehumanizing way for many generations, but also expresses how difficult and not in a playwright’s place to change these societal prejudices.…
- 1530 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
They were often the center of crude nicknames, harsh comments, and bullying when seen walking around town. Many people saw this, and many famous authors wrote about it. Much of the antisemitism in the European commercial world came from the fact that those of the Non-Jewish community could not match the economies of scale and advertising promotions of the Jews at the time (Perry, 141). Mark Twain once wrote, “I am persuaded that in Russia, Austria, and Germany, nine-tenths of the hostility towards the Jewish community comes from the average Christian’s inability to compete successfully with the average Jew in business, in either straight business, or the questionable sort (Concerning the Jews, 1898). Along with this, Abraham Foxman wrote that “it is likely that non-Jews in Medieval or Renaissance Europe harbored feelings of fear, vulnerability, and hostility towards Jews, because they resented being beholden to Jewish lenders,” (Foxman, 65). Not only have famous authors wrote about how Jews have been portrayed economically through history, but it has been an important aspect in some famous plays, including work done by William Shakespeare. In Shakespeare’s famous play, The Merchant of Venice, the character Shylock is characterized as a Jewish moneylender who is considered “unscrupulous and avaricious.” This one character has stuck with the Jewish…
- 2329 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
The character Shylock was a stereotypical Jew of his time, and as Jews were generally ostracized from normal society, the audience would have been familiar and understanding with Shakespeare’s characterisation, actually finding Shylock a comedic figure whereas today he is seen as tragic. In Shakespeare’s time, Jews were not treated well at all. This was because they were a minority group, as they had been previously banned from the country by Edward I unless they were willing to convert to Christianity. But, in large European cities, like Venice there was a large Jewish population. As these cities relied on trade, the authorities encouraged Jews to become moneylenders. This was because the Christian law, which…
- 4069 Words
- 17 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the Merchant of Venice, Shylock states, “He hath disgraced me and laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies- and what’s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath now a Jew eyes? Hath not Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions?” (Shakespeare 110) This quote explains Shylock’s relationship with Antonio by stating that Antonio has laughed at his losses, made fun of his earnings, humiliated his race and turned his friends against him. Upset Shylock goes on stating that all of this is because he’s a Jew. He goes on claiming that Jews are just as human as anyone else. This statement exemplifies the idea of how Jews were treated,…
- 997 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Shakespeare’s main character, Shylock, is central to constant discrimination simply because he is a Jew. This is demonstrated in Act 1, Scene 3 when Antonio borrows money from Shylock. This scene is the first time the audience is introduced to Shylock and he quickly speaks of how he has been mistreated by Antonio because of his religion “You call me misbeliever, cut-throat dog, And spit upon my Jewish gabardine”. Shakespeare then reinforces this when Salarino is attempting to convince Shylock not to take a pound of Antonio’s flesh by questioning what good it would do. Shylock explains that “if nothing else it will feed my revenge” and how “He hath disgraced me…and what’s his reason? I am a Jew.” (3,1).…
- 1878 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
"Shylock the Jew, one of William Shakespeare's profoundly ambivalent villains, is strangely isolated" (Bloom 24). He is portrayed as a usurer: A leader of money on interest rather than a receiver of stolen goods. This concept will prove to the audience that the Jews are in fact "cheap" and have a frugal sense for possessions. It is an intriguing idea to think that even in Shakespeare's time, stereotyping was a mundane part of their lives. Shakespeare's anti-Semitism seems harsh, but shows that not all Jews are vile like most people believed in his time. Shylock is shown to be hard working (Goddard 5). Believe it or not, there is some…
- 1483 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Throughout the play, The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare cultivates the idea of “Shylock the Jew” being both a villain and a victim each depending on the reader’s interpretation of the play. 16th century Venice was largely Roman Catholic and Christian. I think in correctly interpreting the play, we have to take a look at what influences Shakespeare may have had in devising Shylock’s character.…
- 739 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the Merchant of Venice, written by the renowned playwright William Shakespeare, is part of brilliant romantic comedy series, it is known largely for its drama and intense allusions to themes and concerns of the time period, which may be looked at differently in the modern society. The title of the play refers to the character of Antonio, who is ‘the Merchant of Venice’, even though the Jewish moneylender, Shylock is the more prominent character, who leaves the audience with strong emotions and a desire to introspect and reflect upon their own lives. Shylock is well known for his dazzling speech in act three, where he manages to elude the villainous, egoistic, and disreputable façade of himself, which is put up due to the naïve stereotypes retained by the Europeans of the 16th century, in spite of later returning to his ways of deception and evil at the completion of his monologue. Shylock’s speech addresses numerous themes and ideas that can be interpreted in various ways depending on the audience’s setting.…
- 973 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Robert F. Kennedy stated, “Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope... and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.” In Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice, Shylock is the core of all ripples. He lashed out against the prejudice that was thrust upon him and is considered evil for doing so. The Merchant of Venice brought together different characters of different religions. Shakespeare used characters in this play to reflect sixteenth century views on Christianity and Judaism. The character Shylock wass used to embody the religious conflicts of the Elizabethan era. Throughout the play, Shylock’s character fluctuates on the fine line of villain and victim.…
- 1034 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Throughout ‘The Merchant of Venice’ there are many examples of villainous acts performed by the characters. Although the character of Shylock may perhaps stand out in the mind of the reader, these acts are not solely limited to him individually. shylock cannot be considered the only villain in the play, for he shoulders much undeserved ridicule for his religion…
- 3954 Words
- 16 Pages
Good Essays -
We are first introduced to Shylock in Act I Scene III when we learn about his job as a moneylender. During this period of time, Jewish people were very limited in the jobs they could obtain; they were looked down upon by, and on the fringe of, society. While the Christians could lend money, it was immoral and against church rule for them to charge any type of interest, it was usurious. However, there was nothing to forbid Jewish lenders from making a living by charging interest. They did so to survive and were despised for such an “immoral and disgraceful” practice. Bassanio goes to Shylock for a loan to be given in Antonio's name. Upon Antonio’s entering, Shylock displays his disdain for Antonio in an aside, “How like a fawning publican he looks! / I hate him for he is Christian, / but more for that in low simplicity / he lends out money gratis…” (1.1.41-45). His hatred is dual in nature; Antonio lends money without interest threatening the existence of his job as a moneylender. Also, Antonio is prejudiced against the Jews and has humiliated and insulted Shylock publicly for both his lending practices and his religion. This is revealed when Shylock asks Antonio why he should lend money to someone who has, “…rated me / About my moneys and my usuances…” (1.3.117-118) “You call me misbeliever, cutthroat dog / And spet upon my Jewish Gaberdine…” (1.3.121-122). Shylock could not retaliate the prejudice, and had to tolerate the abuse, "Still have I borne it…
- 1306 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays