Preview

Sustainability Could Happen (Harden vs. Garret)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sustainability Could Happen (Harden vs. Garret)
Sustainability Could Happen
Harden vs. Garret

It can be argued that human instinct is an ever evolving characteristic that is never always in sync with that of nature. Human’s have the ability and sometimes the burden to understand and comprehend what is happening to him and his surroundings. One thing that is consistent with Human instinct is that the level of understanding and the ability to adapt to one’s surrounding has both different points of views and attitudes towards what direction one should progress. What should the humans do to live sustainably?In Wendell Barry’s Getting along with Nature, Berry feels that change begins with the realization of interdependency between nature and humans. In The Tragedy of the Commons, by Garret Hardin, the population is the greatest evil facing sustainability. Hardin and Berry are the quintessential polar opposites in regards to their own personal perceptions, human nature, and faith in society but if we could meld these two minds then the idea of sustainability could become a reality.
Hardin’s and Berry’s Synopsis The main idea of Hardin’s The Tragedy of the Commons, is that with population increase comes too many humans. Too many humans will undoubtedly harm his environment through the theory that consumption is at the core of the human instinct. Looking directly at Hardin’s ‘Tragedy‘ principle, he is saying that it is in the Human nature to pursue self indulgence and that supersedes the good of the community. If every human thinks in this manner then it is only a matter of time before that indulgence can no longer be supported and everyone will share the loss. The Common’s example says this; If there is a common space where everyone can raise their cattle and they can receive full benefit from the sale of that cattle then then end result plus one. If one herder brings in one new cattle then every herder starts to bring in new cattle and the commons will eventually be destroyed. Now, if the entire commons



Cited: (http://www.globalhealthhub.org/2010/10/15/ted-2010-hans-rosling-on-global-population-growth/)  De Young R. and S. Kaplan (2012). Adaptive muddling. In R. De Young and T. Princen [Eds.] The Localization Reader: Adapting to the Coming Downshift. (Chapter 22, Pp. 287-298) Cambridge, MA: The MIT (HTTP Press.www-personal.umich.edu/~rdeyoung/tragedy.html) Hunter, Lori, Environmental Implications of Population Dynamics, MR-1191-WFHF/RF/DLPF, 2000, 97 pp., ISBN: 0-8330-2901-0.www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB5045/index1.html Miller, Tyler; Spoolman, Scott; “Living in the Environment: Custom Edition”. cc Cengage Learning; 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second, the passage mentions that commons prevented overgrazing because people were careful not to take more than their share of…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Birth, death, migration, community interactions, and abiotic factors can influence the size of a population. Changes to ecosystems, due to season, climate, and successions, can also impact population growth and decline. The effects of all of these components combine to determine the carrying capacity of a population within a particular ecosystem.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gore vs. Suzuki

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    David Suzuki’s A Sacred Balance and Al Gore’s A Climate Emergency both outline the detrimental ways in which technology, population growth, and our way of living have begun to and will continue to destroy our diverse ecosystem. However, the outlooks that these two environmental giants have on man’s role in the world are perfectly opposite. “There is no environment ‘out there,’” urges Suzuki, “we are born of the earth and constructed from the four sacred elements of earth, air, fire, and water” (432). Gore, contrastingly, doesn’t look at humans as part of the interconnected “web,” but as rather just “[having an] impact on [the earth]” (456).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sustainability calls for new thinking and new ways of balancing the ecosystem so that life and nature are preserved for generations unborn. Nature's resources are not infinitesimal. Hence, nature should be judiciously used and preserved. Daniel Quinn's book, "Ishmael" consists of some weaknesses. One of such weakness is, rather than state the directions the world should change and how to achieve the change, he simply appeals to people to change their minds. I believe that for a mind change to be meaningful and useful, there is a need for direction and instructions towards the desired change and towards making the world better. The government, for instance, use incentives to keep the economy stable and encourage production and exploitation of natural resources. There is a need for an elaboration of the negative impacts of production and exploitation of nature and the desired course of action to remedy the negative fallouts. How does Man change their minds, if they are clueless about how dangerously their actions are affecting the world.? This leads to another weakness portrayed in Quinn’s novel. Man is irrational, they fail to act accordingly, rather would think out of any reason just to ignore an existing issue. For example, global warming. There are scientific proofs and long…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The philosophical tragedy of the commons occurs when individuals overuse (for their personal benefit) the commons to the point where it impedes on the use and future use of others and future generations. This overuse also leads to devaluation. Hardin proposed an analogy of a field “open to all,” in which common ownership leads to environmental degradation. In terms of pollution, the problem of the commons deals with adding to the commons rather than taking from the commons.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hardin Essay Questions 2

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The word “ethics” in the title of Hardin’s essay refers to the reality of the threatening consequences of overpopulation. Hardin reasons that the results of overusing natural resources to provide for the world causes the population to increase at a rapid rate. The ethical principle that Hardin believes should guide the passenger’s conduct in lifeboat Earth is limiting the provisions to helpless countries to control their population.…

    • 704 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using the textbooks, the University Library, or other resources, answer each of the following questions in 100 to 200 words.…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Aldo Leopolds main points in his essay was that we as humans can not replace, rebuild nature. So before it goes to far, and get's to destroyed we must restore it. As people though we can only do so much and we can't restore it with foreign plants, but only the natural plants that originated there. So if we destroy an area's ecosystem then we can never restore, and replenish it to its original state and land consistency. In his essay Leopold said that "we have radically modified the biotic system because we had to. Food chains now begin with corn, and alfalfa instead of oaks and bluestem, flows through cows, hogs, and poultry instead of into elk, deer, and grouse." Therefore we can never restore damage done but only reroute it.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In humans recent history there has been an increased noticeable mistreatment of the world around them. Humans need to know we are not the only ones living there, there are plants and animals and future offspring for all. Not only does the earth need to be treated well for them but it also needs to be treated well for us, because we rely on them for a healthy life. Many people may say that there is a connection between nature and humans theses thoughts are expressed in Annie Dillard's short story, “Living Like Weasels”. Both authors have their point of view on topics but both agree that human behavior needs to improve for a bigger better future.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    of “how society manages its scarce resources” and the manner in which a society makes…

    • 2911 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Passion for Environment

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Carson believes that sustainability is crucial in keeping the ecosystem in balance. Carson in Fable of Tomorrow writes “on the farms hens brooded, but no chicks hatched. The farmers complained that they were unable to raise any pigs.” All this was happening because people of that town did not pay attention to the changes happening around them or perhaps did not want to think that something was wrong. Because that would mean that they would have to step out of their comfort zone and change their ways of thinking. But we see now that what could happen if we don’t change our way of thinking. Carson admits “if an environment is not sustained then the ecosystem will overtime fall apart. Overusing one part of and ecosystem can cause the ecosystem to eventually fail.” Carson in Fable of Tomorrow also writes “No enemy action had silenced the rebirth of new life in this stricken world. The people had done it themselves.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garrett Hardin first wrote “The Tragedy of the Commons”, and was published in his Journal in 1968, and it is one of the big issue World today face. He has mention tragedy of Common as exploitation of human on the environment without accounting externalities. He has given example on four herdsmen. It generally takes place from agriculture revolution and it proceeding even in post-industrial revolution whereby Hardin have concern on it. This means that common take more advantage from common resources over private. As four herdsmen who share one pastures land, this is not suitable in post-industrial revolution because he explain about the depleting human resources that time whereas it is more concern with pollution that human activities have…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smog Pollution in Beijing

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Garrett Hardin proposes that the problem of the commons is caused by the conflict between the individual interest of a rational self-interested man and the limit of a commons. His reasoning works in the following way: each individual taking a certain amount of resources from/dumping a certain amount of wastes (let’s call this amount A) into the commons brings an individual gain of G to him or her, and a collective loss of L to the whole commons. If the total population over the commons is P, then his or her individual loss becomes roughly L divided by P, which, in most cases, is smaller than his or her gain, G. Therefore, any rational and self-interested man will keep using resources from/dumping wastes into the commons. However, the total available resources/affordable wastes of a commons are limited and let’s call the limit L. If each person…

    • 2595 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interdepence of Man

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nature endowed this earth well for all its vast journey over the centuries. It was desperately necessary that she should, for, if supplies of life-supporting essentials gave out we couldn't leave and go elsewhere. But because the means of supply were, and are, just this thin skin of soil with its water and air, it was vital that we should live only on the earth's income, not its capital.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays