Susan B Anthony Pros And Cons
History
Susan B. Anthony stated, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.” The first proposed equal right Amendment entered the Congressional session in the year of 1923.
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King spoke in 1963 at a march on Washington about a dream. Reverend King articulates on “the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence promising that all men would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (King, 1963). And, it was obvious then, and apparent at the present America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned (King, 1963), and the researcher might add to women too. …show more content…
Both, houses of congress approved the matter, but the measure failed because the required secured support was not provided. And yet since 1982, the ERA have been reintroduced, and yet present never voted on once more.
Equality is an issue many countries processes and assesses in the workplace environment. Men are not subject to the destitute of justice nor humanity, and many men are truthful and honest, who despise the autocracy of inequality for women (Anthony, 1848). Therefore, the argument is the acceptance of more women in senior positions equivalent to the men in
CORPORATE AMERICA: NON-CONFORMING SCHEMES 12
Corporate America. Since, the performance of those individuals is base on their efficiency and relevancy to the
Susan B. Anthony stated, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.” The first proposed equal right Amendment entered the Congressional session in the year of 1923.
Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King spoke in 1963 at a march on Washington about a dream. Reverend King articulates on “the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence promising that all men would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” (King, 1963). And, it was obvious then, and apparent at the present America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned (King, 1963), and the researcher might add to women too. …show more content…
Both, houses of congress approved the matter, but the measure failed because the required secured support was not provided. And yet since 1982, the ERA have been reintroduced, and yet present never voted on once more.
Equality is an issue many countries processes and assesses in the workplace environment. Men are not subject to the destitute of justice nor humanity, and many men are truthful and honest, who despise the autocracy of inequality for women (Anthony, 1848). Therefore, the argument is the acceptance of more women in senior positions equivalent to the men in
CORPORATE AMERICA: NON-CONFORMING SCHEMES 12
Corporate America. Since, the performance of those individuals is base on their efficiency and relevancy to the