Preview

Survival of the Fittest

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2227 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Survival of the Fittest
Introduction

According to Darwin's Origins of Species that was published in 1859, in the process of nature selection and evolution, the weaker ones will be unavoidably weed out by the stronger ones. His theory had caused philosophers, sociologists, and others began to adopt the idea that human society had also evolved. One of the most well-know theory inspired by Darwin is Spenser's social evolution, popularly known as the Social Darwinism, which centers around the idea of " Survival of the fittest"(Wikipedia, 2007) In the following essay, the author will try to explain some of the key characteristics of this philosophy, as well as providing some critics on its ruthlessness that are against this concept. However, there will be strong and positive arguments presented against those critics in defense of the idea of social Darwinism. Last but not least, a conclusion will be formed and the justification of author's belief will be given.

The Origins of Social Darwinism

Herbert Spencer, who was the original inventor of the idea of social Darwinism, published a huge number of books regarding the concepts of " survival of the fittest", "Society advances," Spencer wrote, "where its fittest members are allowed to assert their fitness with the least hindrance" (quoted in Bergman, n.d) He went on to argue that the unfit should "not be prevented from dying out". His whole idea is based on the favor of competition and individuality. In his theory, he also mentioned about government should involve as little as possible, and also encouraged government not to aide the poor, since it would only promotes laziness and vice and many more other subject matters. In modern time, his words are still considered by many as a golden rule of doing business, for example, Andrew Carnegie had wrote in his biography that "the law of competition, be it benign or not, is here; we cannot evade it; no substitutes for it have been found; and while the law may be sometimes hard for the individual,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Darwinism- a 19th-century doctrine that the social order is a product of natural selection of those persons best suited to existing living conditions.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Social Darwinism- The application of Darwin’s concept of “the survival of the fittest” to explain evolution in nature to human social relationships.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Halsall, P. (1997). Modern history sourcebook: Herbert Spencer: Social Darwinism, 1857. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from The Internet Modern History Sourcebook: http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/spencer-darwin.html…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long before Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection became publicly known, scientists have been observing the changes in both plants and species. Darwin’s theory remains widely known because it explains the reasons for these changes in nature; he suggests that organisms that are more fit are able to survive and reproduce better than organisms who are not. Based off of this idea that only the fittest survive, many Americans believe that because our military force is strong and our enemies are often destroyed, we are entitled some sort of dominate power. Greg Graffin co-author of “Anarchy Evolution” uses this exact theory to explain why this theory of national superiority not true. In “‘Survival of the Fittest’ is a Sham,” an article released from Time Magazine in September of 2015, Greg Graffin convinces the audience through tone and logos that American superiority is nonexistent.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Progressive Era, the theory Social Darwinism was a belief conceived by many individuals. This theory was created after the philosopher Charles Darwin’s theory of survival of the fittest. Social Darwinism is a theory stating that every individual must compete against each other in order to achieve success. This theory message states that a person should take any necessary action to earn the highest income possible. Followers of this theory, including Andrew Carnegie, used this theory as fuel and became wealthy, greedy businessmen. Laissez-faire believers did not like this theory. They believed it caused corruption, and influenced people that there is a “sink or swim” economy. Railroad managers displayed little interest for patents. Many railroads manufactured most of their equipment and try to stay away from conflict with two patented items. At the time, because of the lack of different models of patents, thus infringement cases remained low. By the 1860’s, several railroads such as New York Central, The Baltimore Chicago, and Ohio .expanded and became more technologically advanced. More equipment were being used which made monopolies and other corporations vulnerable to infringement. People used this opportunity to try to receive large settlements from corporations for a corporation using a product that an inventor created. As time progressed, railroad technologies began being controlled by Corporate Research. The Federal Government and Corporations conflicted more, In Conclusion, Industrialization led to Monopolies, the railroad industry, and patents being used for corruption. Monopolies damaged the economy and caused fraud. Business owners became money hungry, and abused their control over the market such as overpricing goods and causing other related businesses to…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 19th century and early 20th century the Social Gospel and Social Darwinism Movements had similar but opposite beliefs; Social Darwinist believed every man is for himself and that big businesses were good for the economy, however followers of The Social Gospel believed in Christianity, favored the poor, and believed that everyone should help one another. Social Darwinism was named after the Naturalist, Charles Darwin, and the belief of evolution in society. One of the founders of Social Darwinism is the philosopher Herbert Spencer, who influenced many Social Darwinist leaders, such as William Graham Sumner; Spencer often used the phrase “Survival of the fittest” in his Social Darwinist lectures. Social Darwinists’ believed in…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Survival of the fittest is an example of competition, and there are those that disagree with “Survival of the Fittest” because it is used to describe a dreadful time in American history and does not take into account how not everyone has equal opportunity in America. John D. Rockefeller was one of these robber barons, and he used “Survival of the Fittest” to justify his monopolization of the oil industry. “Social scientists have long understood that one’s economic status in society is not a function of one’s moral worth. It depends largely on the economic status of one’s parents, the models of success available while growing up, and the educational opportunities along the way” (Reich). Reich and others like him make a great argument against competition, but he does not account for those who achieved success without those things. People such as Oprah Winfrey were born into poor households. Oprah competed for high grades and scholarships in high school that allowed her to thrive in one of the most competitive industries in America-…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many individuals recognize Charles Darwin as the beginner of this way of thinking. Darwin’s theory is that populations are in competition with each other for natural resources; in this struggle to survive, the environment makes a selection known as “natural selection.” In this process, Darwin describes how the weakest individuals, because of their natural characteristic, do not survive. Only the individuals who are strong and adaptable survive and transmit the genes to the offspring. Common sense seems to dictate that his idea justifies, directly or indirectly, acts of selfishness, racism, and violence.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism was the use of Charles Darwin’s scientific theory of evolution and natural selection to a society’s development. The theory stated that in nature, only those who were the fittest survived. This explanation was adopted by many American businessmen who believed the theory to be scientific proof of their power. There were two men who stood out from the group of businessmen; Herbert Spencer and William Graham. Both of these men were extremely influential.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a Social Darwinist, Carnegie applied Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory of “survival of the fittest” to the economy of the society.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Graham Sumner’s beliefs, on the other hand, proved to be more callous than those of Andrew Carnegie. While Sumner agrees about the inevitability of poverty, he refutes Carnegie’s assertion that a rich man dies dishonored if he neglects to donate his wealth to charity. A proponent of Social Darwinism, Sumner believes that social inequality is the right and natural outcome of the struggles of men trying to succeed in the world, otherwise known as “survival of the fittest.” Consequently, the rich possess no obligation to aid the poor because the blame for inequality does not fall on fellow men, but the harsh reality of nature, which ordains the “chances and conditions of life on earth” (99). Sumner also criticizes men like Carnegie who take pity on the poor and weak which causes them to “devise schemes for remedying what they…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the turn of the 19th century, a psychologist Herbert Spencer branched off the thought of Darwinism and promoted the evolutionary thought of social Darwinism which differed from the original idea of survival of the fittest (Goodwin, 1995). Social Darwinists believe in the idea that humans, like plants and animals, struggle for the existence of natural selection results in “survival of the fittest.” Spencer claimed that, evolution must be unchecked because of its natural and inevitable forces that can be harmful when tampered with by humans. Social Darwinists create a huge gap between the rich and the poor and say that “if successful then fit” which differs from Darwinisms belief that “if fit then successful.”…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imperialists of this time were justified on so many levels in their thinking. Social Darwinism was a construct that welded biological science (evolution) with social science. A philosopher of the 19th century, Herbert Spencer said, "this law of organic progress is the law of all progress. Whether it be in the development of the Earth, in the development of Life upon its surface, the development of Society, of Government, ..., this same evolution of the simple into the complex, through a process of continuous differentiation, holds throughout."( Progress: Its Law and…

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Darwinism is the idea that some groups of society are stronger than others or also known as “Survival of the fittest”. For this was a cause of Imperialism. Imperialism is when a stronger nation takes over a weaker nation or region and dominates its economic, political, or cultural life. Other causes of Imperialism were Economic motives, nationalism, balance of powers, and white man’s burden. Therefore they were able to control people who were scrawnier and determine who or what is acceptable in that society. The position I take is that Social Darwinism is true and does exist. This is proven through history and literature.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Ideologies of both Social Darwinism and Social Gospel was a form of justification that was adopted by many American businessmen as scientific proof of their superiority. Social Darwinism was created by using the applications of the English naturalist and geologist Charles Darwin’s scientific theories of evolution and natural selection, ‘the survival of the fittest’. Herbert Spencer applied the Darwinian Theory to human development and William Graham Sumner thought that the economy was a natural event and did not need any guidance in its evolution; Sumer’s views greatly contrasted the beliefs of the Social Gospel.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays