Preview

Supreme Court of the United States and Primary Sources Sheet

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
274 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court of the United States and Primary Sources Sheet
Graded Assignment
Korematsu v. the United States (1944)

Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions.

(2 points)
Score

1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction?
Answer:
He challenged the government order to evacuate all Japanese into war camps.
(2 points)
Score

2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts of the majority opinion, what did the U.S. government believe some Japanese Americans would do if they were allowed to remain free on the West Coast?
Answer:
They believed that they would spy on America and sabotage our defenses.

(2 points)
Score

3. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?
Answer:

When our shores are in danger, or threatened by hostile forces we must do what is necessary to protect them.

(2 points)
Score

4. What did the dissenting justices think about the power of military authorities?
Answer:

The Supreme Court

(2 points)
Score

5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese Americans were being deprived of what rights?
Answer:

(40 points)
Score

6. Imagine you are living in Los Angeles in 1944 and have just read about the case of Korematsu v. the United States. Write a letter to the editor of the Los Angeles Times telling which opinion in the case (majority or dissenting) you support and explain why.

Refer to the rubric and scoring instructions on the next page to see how your teacher will grade your assignment.

Answer:

Your Score ___ of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race, but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country, the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II, the president of the United States, Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese ancestry both citizens and non-citizens. The order was to get any individual with in the area of the Pacific Coast to report to assembly centers where they were being detained until released by military authorities. Individuals with Japanese ancestry were being imprisoned without any evidence that they were a danger to the country and were deprived from their Constitutional rights. At first the first order was for any individual with Japanese ancestry to stay in their home with a curfew assigned to them, without…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On December 7, 1941 the Japanese Imperial Navy launched an attack on Pearl Harbor, the next day Congress declared war on Japan. Public opinion towards people of any “Asian” ancestry turned to racial hatred. Under political and public pressure Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 on February 19th, 1942 (Alonso 30). Enter one of the Dark times in American History, the imprisonment of its own citizens because of racial backgrounds. The act was attacked in the Supreme Court case “Hirabayasi v. United States,” though the Supreme Court upheld the order as “A means of National Security in war time” (Touro Law 2). In May of 1942 Fred Korematsu sued the United States. In a 6-to-3 vote the Supreme Court…

    • 2136 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    4. I disagree with this court decision because I think this was a violation of the fourteenth amendment made by the Supreme Court. I understand why the justices decided as they did, but their duty was…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Japanese-Americans were citizens of the United States and residences within the country, they did not have equivalent rights during this time in history. “The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity and a citizen of California by residence. No claim is made that he is not loyal to this country.” Many Japanese-Americans were being treated as if they had been disloyal to the US and even alienated because of how they looked. Also, the freedom to own land was taken from them as well. “The Federal Reserve Banks took charge of property owned by evacuees, while the Farm Security Administration took over the agricultural property.” Owning property is one of the greatest freedoms and American can uphold and as history has shown it can easily be taken away in an instant. Japanese-Americans were forced to sell everything because they were very limited in what they could take with them to the internment…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    their ethnicity. That is not what America stands for and we should never approve of…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 17 Terms

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also issues on Constitutionality- court declared this act as unconstitutional, holding that the fourteenth amendment gave congress the power to outlaw discrimination by states, but not by private individuals.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents consistently showed that Japanese Americans had committed no acts of treason to justify mass incarceration. With this new evidence, a pro-bono legal team that included the Asian Law Caucus re-opened Korematsu’s 40-year-old case on the basis of government…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fill in the notes for the landmark case you selected to connect with your topic in the previous lessons. You may use the official court documents for the case and articles written about the case to fill in the required information below.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, a time of confusion and fear settled around America. Previously respected and average everyday citizens became feared and outcast by most people in the United States. “All citizens alike, both in and out of uniform feel the impact of war in greater or lesser measure (Justice Hugo Black).” The government declared that all the people of Japanese descent living along the Pacific coast be sent to live in concentration camps where the living arrangements were not the most pleasant and were overcrowded.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recall the decision of the Supreme Court concerning the rights of residents of territories and…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Farewell to Manzanar

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On December 7, 1941 there was a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii by Japan. The attack came from the Japanese, yet it caused unfounded fear in this country toward Japanese Americans. The book Farewell to Manzanar by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston depicts the reactions of the government and the American public toward Japanese Americans after the attack on Pearl Harbor. So why were they the ones punished for it? We still see examples of inaccurate assumptions, hypocrisy, and discrimination during this time in our nation’s history that can be related to our own community since we continue to categorize, generalize and overreact.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So since, “For over 50 years… Americans has seen newcomers from Japan… as a threat to the ‘American standard of living’ (Myths, Prejudices, and War).” Being viewed as a threat automatically caused the Japanese to be seen as a liability to Americans and put the Japanese-Americans at a huge disadvantage. The Japanese Americans were not treated equally because of the previously formed bias judgements formed against them by Americans which was shown through “state and local laws [that] reflected the belief that people of Asian descent were inferior (Myths, Prejudices, and War).” Changes in the law against a certain ethnicity violates the 14th amendment which states that American citizens who should have been treated with the same rights that Caucasian American citizens were treated…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A special bulletin on the radio announced that the Japanese had mounted a surprise air attack on the U.S. Naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii” (Carnes 95). This action against the United States on December 7, 1941 by Japan cause racial prejudice and unrest in the United States. This event also lead to the making of laws that caused the creation of Japanese internment camps. The War Relocation Authority attempted to justify their actions against Japanese Americans in a couple of ways. “The action taken with respect to Japanese in this country is justifiable on the grounds of military necessity for several reasons” (Carnes 97). One reason that is stated is that “All Japanese look very much alike to a white person...” (Carnes 97).…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Identify six key characteristics of the U.S. Constitution. 1. Constitutions are a higher form of law that speak with a political authority that no ordinary law or other government action can ever match.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Japanese Internment Camps

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The United States government had no right to intern Japanese Americans because of their ethnic background. People argued that the Japanese aliens in the United States posed as a threat but in reality “more than two-thirds of the Japanese who were interned in the spring of 1942 were citizens of the United States” (Ross). The Nikkei had the same rights as any other American citizen, yet they were still interned. The public skipped to the conclusion that all people of Japanese ancestry were saboteurs which heightened racial prejudices. Furthermore, the accusation of disloyalty among Japanese Americans caused the state department to send Agent Curtis B. Munson to investigate this issue among the Japanese Americans; he concluded “there is no Japanese problem on the west coast…a remarkable, even extraordinary degree of loyalty among this generally suspect ethnic group” (Chronology). Munson’s report stated that there was no military necessity for mass incarceration of these people, yet the government ignored and kept the report…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays