Supply Chain Postponement
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0960-0035.htm IJPDLM
37,8
594
Postponement: an evolving supply chain concept
Christopher A. Boone, Christopher W. Craighead and
Joe B. Hanna
Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
Received January 2006
Revised July 2007
Accepted July 2007
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess and document the progress of postponement research, identify current gaps, and provide direction for future research efforts.
Design/methodology/approach – Postponement literature published from 1999 to 2006 was reviewed. Findings – The review revealed a significant increase in the number of postponement research efforts, many of which at least partially addressed past challenges noted in previous research. Several opportunities to continue addressing these past challenges were identified. Future researchers are challenged to validate new postponement concepts and extend postponement research beyond its manufacturing context. Other challenges call for the continued assessment of the relationship between postponement and uncertainty and the investigation into the slow rate of postponement adoption among practitioners.
Research limitations/implications – This effort is not an exhaustive review of all postponement research. This review does not consider unpublished papers, papers in non-academic journals, or papers presented at conferences.
Practical implications – This review is a useful resource for supply chain researchers interested in supply chain strategies and the evolution of postponement as a supply chain concept.
Originality/value – This paper uses the challenges of past research as a measure of the progress of postponement thought and theory. The gaps identified and challenges made will serve as a foundation upon which future researchers can build.
Keywords Supply chain management, Uncertainty management, Corporate strategy
Paper
37,8
594
Postponement: an evolving supply chain concept
Christopher A. Boone, Christopher W. Craighead and
Joe B. Hanna
Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
Received January 2006
Revised July 2007
Accepted July 2007
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess and document the progress of postponement research, identify current gaps, and provide direction for future research efforts.
Design/methodology/approach – Postponement literature published from 1999 to 2006 was reviewed. Findings – The review revealed a significant increase in the number of postponement research efforts, many of which at least partially addressed past challenges noted in previous research. Several opportunities to continue addressing these past challenges were identified. Future researchers are challenged to validate new postponement concepts and extend postponement research beyond its manufacturing context. Other challenges call for the continued assessment of the relationship between postponement and uncertainty and the investigation into the slow rate of postponement adoption among practitioners.
Research limitations/implications – This effort is not an exhaustive review of all postponement research. This review does not consider unpublished papers, papers in non-academic journals, or papers presented at conferences.
Practical implications – This review is a useful resource for supply chain researchers interested in supply chain strategies and the evolution of postponement as a supply chain concept.
Originality/value – This paper uses the challenges of past research as a measure of the progress of postponement thought and theory. The gaps identified and challenges made will serve as a foundation upon which future researchers can build.
Keywords Supply chain management, Uncertainty management, Corporate strategy
Paper
References: Alderson, W. (1950), “Marketing efficiency and the principle of postponement”, Cost and Profit Outlook, Vol Aviv, Y. and Federgruen, A. (2001a), “Capacitated multi-item inventory systems with random seasonally fluctuating demands: implications for postponement strategies”, Management Aviv, Y. and Federgruen, A. (2001b), “Design for postponement: a comprehensive characterization of its benefits under unknown demand distributions”, Operations Bailey, J.P. and Rabinovich, E. (2005), “Internet book retailing and supply chain management: an analytical study of inventory location speculation and postponement”, Transportation Bhatnagar, R. and Viswanathan, S. (2000), “Re-engineering global supply chains”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol Bolumole, Y. (2001), “The supply chain role of third-party logistics providers”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol Bowersox, D., Stank, T.P. and Daugherty, P.J. (1999), “Lean launch: managing product introduction risk through response-based logistics”, Journal of Production Innovative Brown, A., Lee, H.L. and Petrakian, R. (2000), “Xilinx improves its semiconductor supply chain using product and process postponement”, Interfaces, Vol Bucklin, L.P. (1965), “Postponement, speculation and structure of distribution channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol CLM (1995), Class Logistics: The Challenge of Managing Continuous Change, CLM, Oak Brook, IL. Chiou, J-S., Wu, L-Y. and Hsu, J. (2002), “The adoption of form postponement strategy in a global logistics system: the case of Taiwanese information technology industry”, Journal of Dapiran, P. (1992), “Benetton – global logistics in action”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol Ernst, R. and Kamrad, B. (2000), “Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol Feitzinger, E. and Lee, H.L. (1997), “Mass customization at Hewlett Packard: the power of postponement”, Harvard Business Review, Vol Fisher, M. (1997), “What is the right supply chain for your product”, Harvard Business Review, Vol Gander, P. and Whitworth, M. (2000), “Don’t put it on, put it off”, Food Manufacture, Vol. 75, pp Geary, S., Childerhouse, P. and Towill, D. (2002), “Uncertainty and the seamless supply chain”, Supply Chain Management Review, July/August, pp Ghemawat, P. and Nueno, J.L. (2006), Zara: Fast Fashion, Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA. Graman, G.A. and Magazine, M.J. (2006), “Implementation issues influencing the decision to adopt postponement”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 26 No. 10, pp. 1068-83. Huang, C.W. and Lo, C.P. (2003), “Using postponed manufacturing to reconfigure the supply chain in the desktop personal company industry: the case Taiwan”, International Journal Jick, J.D. (1979), “Mixing quantitative methods: triangulation in action”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol Lampel, J. and Mintzberg, H. (1996), “Customizing customization”, Sloan Management Review, Vol Lee, H.L. (2002), “Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties”, California Management Review, Vol McGrath, J.E. (1981), Dilemmatics. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 179-210. Mentzer, J.T. and Flint, D.J. (1997), “Validity in logistics research”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol Pagh, J.D. and Cooper, M.C. (1998), “Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol Partanen, J. and Haapasalo, H. (2004), “Fast production for order fulfillment: implementing mass customization in electronics industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, Prasad, S., Tata, J. and Madan, M. (2005), “Build to order supply chains in developed and developing countries”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol Rabinovich, E. and Evers, P. (2003), “Postponement effects on inventory performance and the impact of information systems”, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol Rogers, E. (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, NY. Scandura, T.A. and Williams, E.A. (2000), “Research methodology in management: current practices, trends, and implications for future research”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 6, pp. 1248-64. Skipworth, H. and Harrison, A. (2004), “Implications of form postponement to manufacturing: a case study”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol Skjoett-Larsen, T. (1999), “Third party logistics – from an interorganizational point of view”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol Su, J., Chang, Y. and Ferguson, M. (2005), “Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customization”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol Tibben-Lembke, R. and Bassok, Y. (2005), “An inventory model for delayed customization: a hybrid approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol Twede, D., Clarke, R.H. and Tait, J. (2000), “Packaging postponement: a global packaging strategy”, Packaging Technology and Sciences, Vol Van Hoek, R.I. (2000), “The role of third-party logistics providers in mass customization”,