Supervisor-Subordinate Relationships in Transformational Leadership and Leader-Member Exchange Model of Leadership: Differences and Similarities.
Both transformational leadership and leader-member exchange leadership theories have been an issue of discussion for many scholars. The majority of authors agree that transformational leaders ‘have qualitatively different and quantitatively greater effects on their followers than the effects of exchange leaders’ (Gupta & Krishnan 2004, p.7). This essay builds on the existing literature about these two theories and will try to draw a parallel between LMX and transformational leadership, i.e. it will reveal the different and similar qualities of supervisor-subordinate relationships. Specifically, the essay focuses on the mechanism that each style of leadership uses in developing these relationships. That will actually help to find out some differences and similarities. This paper initially revisits the main aspects of transformational leadership and LMX leadership theories and then discusses them in relation to their capacity to develop differing qualities of supervisor-subordinate relationships.
In ‘Leader-Member Exchange, Transformational Leadership, and Value System’ Krishnan (2005) noted that according to Burns, ‘the result of transforming leadership is a relationship of mutual stimulation and elevation that converts followers into leaders and convert leaders into moral agent’, which means that both leaders and team members offer one another. In this case, leaders serve their followers, create conditions for their further development, and make them feel free and independent in their work. Burns also claimed that ‘leaders and followers raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation’, i.e. the transformational leadership is possible because of both, the team members and leaders, become better and improve each other (Gupta & Krishnan 2004, p. 14). Bass further expanded the theory proposed by Burns and introduced it into the organizational context. He defined transformational leaders as leaders who motivate followers to do more than they expected to
In ‘Leader-Member Exchange, Transformational Leadership, and Value System’ Krishnan (2005) noted that according to Burns, ‘the result of transforming leadership is a relationship of mutual stimulation and elevation that converts followers into leaders and convert leaders into moral agent’, which means that both leaders and team members offer one another. In this case, leaders serve their followers, create conditions for their further development, and make them feel free and independent in their work. Burns also claimed that ‘leaders and followers raise one another to higher levels of morality and motivation’, i.e. the transformational leadership is possible because of both, the team members and leaders, become better and improve each other (Gupta & Krishnan 2004, p. 14). Bass further expanded the theory proposed by Burns and introduced it into the organizational context. He defined transformational leaders as leaders who motivate followers to do more than they expected to
References: Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI & Berson Y 2003, ‘Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 207–218, viewed 23 April 2008 <www.apa.org/ journals/releases/apl882207.pdf> Denhardt JV & Campbell KB 2006, ‘The role of democratic values in transformational leadership’, Administration & Society, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 556-572, viewed 26 April 2008, SAGE Journals online, item: 556. Dubrin, AJ, Dlaglish, C & Miller, P 2006, Leadership, 2nd Asia-pacific edition, John Whiley & Sons Australia, Ltd, Australia Elicker JD, Levy PE & Rosalie J 2006, ‘The role of leader-member exchange in the performance appraisal process’, Journal of Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 531-551, viewed 26 April 2008, SAGE Journals online, item: 286622 Gupta V & Krishnan V 2004, ‘Impact of socialization on transformational leadership: role of leader member exchange’, South Asian Journal of Management, vol. 11(3), July-September, pp. 7-20, viewed 15 April 2008, Publications of Venkat R. Krishnan, item: varum. Krishnan V 2004, ‘Impact of transformational leadership on followers’ influence strategies’, The Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 58-72, viewed 15 April 2008, Publications of Venkat R. Krishnan, item: 2004lodj. Krishnan V 2005, ‘Leader-member exchange, transformational leadership, and value system’, Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 14-21, viewed 15 April 2008, Publications of Venkat R. Krishnan, item: 2005ejbo. Mehra P & Krishnan V 2005, ’Impact of Svadharma-orientation on transformational leadership and followers’ trust in leader’, Journal of Indian Psychology, vol. 23 (1), January, pp. 1-11, viewed 15 April 2008, Publications of Venkat R. Krishnan, item: preeti. Singh N & Krishnan V 2005, ‘Towards understanding transformational leadership in india: a grounded theory approach’, Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, vol. 9, no 2, pp. 5-17, viewed 15 April 2008, Publications of Venkat R. Krishnan, item: niti1.