Summary Of Superior Groups In Arab Society
Santa R Canessa
SSN 194
Prof. Darren Barany
09/25/2013
Essay about Chapter I
Since society exists, there’s always have been a superior group that always takes control over society and an inferior group that is usually under the authority of the dominating group. Moreover, the superior group usually has the authoritarianism characteristics. According to George Lundskow authoritarianism means “the desire to dominate anyone or anything perceived as weaker or inferior” (Lundskow 34). For instance, some dominating groups in society can been seen as “evil other or evil enemy” because of its demonized characteristics. On the other hand, religion has a connection with authoritarianism, since it is a dominating group in certain countries and communities. …show more content…
For instance “evil other” is the superior group in a certain community; therefore, authoritarianism has a strong relationship in the construction of “evil other”. As an illustration, the government in Arab society is defined as “evil other” because of its desire to take control over women. It is a value to note, females in this country are degraded because the government and the authority, usually dominated by men see the women weak and incapable to take control over situations. Hence, men in Arab society are the “evil other” discriminating women to do jobs and take position as bigger authority, “this evil enemy designation may be placed on a real group or an imaginary group, but either way, the enemy acquires an unreal and impossible stigma- they become an evil with allegedly supernatural powers” (Lundskow 42). This quote explains that somehow the “evil other” possess an unexplainable power that lead them to do what they do. In other words, women in Arab society treated as objects, is the consequence of the men that abuse their power, because they think what they’re doing is right and that’s why men have the strength for, to control …show more content…
“Whatever group becomes the demonized other, religion often encodes in term of an evil other, an evil enemy” (Lundskow 42). Lundskow explains that the practitioner of a certain religion convert their message against the “evil other” and often they see the evil enemy as inferior and demonized. However, there are situations when a particular religion takes an unfair action against what they call the “evil other”. For example, the religious terrorism which is the Islamic Extremism see the devils “evil other” as “an explanation for why bad things happen, but they can also blame our misfortunes on devilish others and punish them by killing them either individually or exterminating the whole lot of them at once” (Lundskow 270). According to this quote the religious terrorism kill people in name of the religion because they see them as evil or because they want to accomplish a certain goal related to their belief. In relation to how this terrorism religion sees the evil Mark P Worrel wrote in Sociology of Religion: A substantive and Transdisciplinary Approach “Devilish others have been known to possess things that we would like to have for ourselves such as land, oil, diamonds, minerals and other valuable resources” (Lundskow, 270). At the end, the terrorists might kill people because they
SSN 194
Prof. Darren Barany
09/25/2013
Essay about Chapter I
Since society exists, there’s always have been a superior group that always takes control over society and an inferior group that is usually under the authority of the dominating group. Moreover, the superior group usually has the authoritarianism characteristics. According to George Lundskow authoritarianism means “the desire to dominate anyone or anything perceived as weaker or inferior” (Lundskow 34). For instance, some dominating groups in society can been seen as “evil other or evil enemy” because of its demonized characteristics. On the other hand, religion has a connection with authoritarianism, since it is a dominating group in certain countries and communities. …show more content…
For instance “evil other” is the superior group in a certain community; therefore, authoritarianism has a strong relationship in the construction of “evil other”. As an illustration, the government in Arab society is defined as “evil other” because of its desire to take control over women. It is a value to note, females in this country are degraded because the government and the authority, usually dominated by men see the women weak and incapable to take control over situations. Hence, men in Arab society are the “evil other” discriminating women to do jobs and take position as bigger authority, “this evil enemy designation may be placed on a real group or an imaginary group, but either way, the enemy acquires an unreal and impossible stigma- they become an evil with allegedly supernatural powers” (Lundskow 42). This quote explains that somehow the “evil other” possess an unexplainable power that lead them to do what they do. In other words, women in Arab society treated as objects, is the consequence of the men that abuse their power, because they think what they’re doing is right and that’s why men have the strength for, to control …show more content…
“Whatever group becomes the demonized other, religion often encodes in term of an evil other, an evil enemy” (Lundskow 42). Lundskow explains that the practitioner of a certain religion convert their message against the “evil other” and often they see the evil enemy as inferior and demonized. However, there are situations when a particular religion takes an unfair action against what they call the “evil other”. For example, the religious terrorism which is the Islamic Extremism see the devils “evil other” as “an explanation for why bad things happen, but they can also blame our misfortunes on devilish others and punish them by killing them either individually or exterminating the whole lot of them at once” (Lundskow 270). According to this quote the religious terrorism kill people in name of the religion because they see them as evil or because they want to accomplish a certain goal related to their belief. In relation to how this terrorism religion sees the evil Mark P Worrel wrote in Sociology of Religion: A substantive and Transdisciplinary Approach “Devilish others have been known to possess things that we would like to have for ourselves such as land, oil, diamonds, minerals and other valuable resources” (Lundskow, 270). At the end, the terrorists might kill people because they