Preview

Summary Of One Last Time By Edith Hamilton

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of One Last Time By Edith Hamilton
By the People: Citizens’ Apathy towards Politics and Refusal to take Responsibilities
Despite the citizens’ demand for democracy where they hope to take control of their administration and a government that responds to their problems, the citizens remain apathetic to politics and refuses to take the responsibilities necessary for the citizenship to work. In “One Last Time”, when Washington tells Hamilton about him stepping down from presidency, Hamilton argued that “as far as people are concerned / You have to serve, you could continue to serve” (“One Last Time” 209). After the revolution, Hamilton represents a more righteous ideology that thinks for the people and commoners that contrasts with the attitude of other politicians who only cares about their personal gains and career. This statement
…show more content…
This reflects that Hamilton, representing the public and commoners, simply wants another person to manage the policies of the new nation for them in ways that they desire. Yet, they are unwilling to think carefully for the future of the nation which is why they want Washington to remain in office to save them the hassle. Even when they are given the option, they fulfill their responsibilities as the citizens of the new nation to the least possible extent. In “The Election of 1800”, the opinion of the voters was displayed for the first time, and their immaturity in determining the fate of the nation as well as their lack of willingness to bear the responsibility of their newly acquired citizenship was displayed. Aaron Burr who “glances off, obfuscates, and dances” and avoids questions which a critical process in informing voters of his vision on the nation is (“The Election of 1800” 258). However, contrary to the expectations of a presidential candidate, he is very attractive to the North”. Some male voters suggest that “he seems approachable” and “like you could grab a beer with him” as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book consists of three parts and covers many events and issues of the young American Republic. It is not set of biographies but detailed review, critique and analyses of several seminal occurrences, mainly duel between Alexander Hamilton and the Governor of New York, Burr (part 1).…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dinner begins with Thomas Jefferson’s account of the Compromise of 1790. Jefferson explains that Hamilton comes to him discouraged that his fiscal policy was being blocked, with most of that opposing force coming from Madison. In order to help them resolve this issue, Jefferson invited them to a dinner, where a compromise was reached; Madison would leave the assumption bill to its fate, and Hamilton would ensure that the Nation’s capital would lie along the Potomac. The assumption bill passed, and construction for the nation’s capital began along the Potomac. However, Jefferson’s story precipitates several question: was the affair really that simple, and why were these three men so fearful of the nation’s future? Ellis takes us through…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ellis uses six significant events in the early years of the republic that involve eight important figures to support his thesis. First, he describes the Hamilton and Burr duel and the history behind it. The story of the duel was a way for Ellis to discuss the importance of character and honor to the founding generation. The next piece of evidence Ellis used was the secret dinner held by Thomas Jefferson in order for James Madison and Alexander Hamilton to reach a compromise. Hamilton wanted support for his Assumption Bill and Madison wanted the national capitol to be closer to the south. Ellis suggests that Jefferson attempted to overemphasize his importance through his account. Ellis also indicates an expanding divide within the country and the need for a wise mediator in order to reach a compromise. Jefferson’s account recognizes the fear in all three of them. This…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamiltonian, Lieutenant- colonel, First U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and Secretary of State and spent his time devoted to the rich and wealthy individuals of Virginia. Though I have little knowledge on today’s congress, senate, and military. What I do remember is that what we have in common with Hamilton is,” Strong central government, order and organization, Industrial development, Helped establish a financial credit for the U.S. government. Hamilton had a firm belief that the rich, powerful and well educated should have the control on the government. Which in all honesty looking at today modern times, I can fully agree that the much upper class controlling the government, why? To be blunt money talks in future and I’m sure during 1780s and 90s it did as well, the rich and well educated people would rather spend his or her tax money on what they believe is right each upper class individual have a grasp on politics. Hamilton’s strong belief is still going strong today and being applied through the Senate Congress…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason I was able to see the impact they had on our country is because John E. Ferling, the author, described the hardships and successes of each person in great detail starting from the very beginning and continuing on all the way to the very end of their lives. John E. Ferling approached this book with a higher opinion of Jefferson, but gained greater appreciation for Hamilton towards the end. I enjoyed learning more about the forming of our nation and the lives of some of our founding fathers. I am inclined to learn more about the characters in the book because the play, ‘Hamilton’ on Broadway is something I’ve wanted to see for a while. I’m interested to see how similar and accurate the play is compared to the book. This author’s writing style is something I enjoyed reading, but I don’t think reading another one of his books is something I’d take part in. My recommendation for this book would be to read it for school and other educational purposes, but only read it for pleasure if you thoroughly enjoy…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Founding Brothers Summary

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also introduces to the readers a crucial theme of his book, which is the importance of compromise, the importance of the individual relationships in the early Union, and the strict beliefs that the Founding Fathers had for one another. Since they knew each another so well and were very aware of the importance of reputation, their disagreements reproduced very high stakes. Starting with a violent clash, Ellis sets the stakes for which these men had learned to debate one another. Other stories end in violent death, but the reader now understands that Ellis views these relationships as heated and fanatical. The fine line between private life and public is often difficult to recognize among political figures whose lives and ideals were so closely tangled. Ellis's version of the Jefferson and Adams relationship will be explicitly…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burr, Hamilton, and Jefferson, a character Analysis. Closely follows the lives of three of the United States greatest politicians as they struggle to create and maintain a new nation. In the appendix of the book the author, Roger Kennedy, explains how he shows sympathy for historical losers and often doubts some triumphs of winners in history books. So in this book, it's obvious Mr. Kennedy shows a bias to Aaron Burr, a lesser-known founder. One such example of this is throughout the book Roger belittles Hamilton and Jefferson to try and show how Burr was more honest and credible then the history books show him to be.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton believed that the upper-class ought to have a stake in the government, as they did during Shay’s Rebellion. “Give therefore to the first class a distinct, permanent share in the government…as they cannot receive any advantage by a change, they therefore will ever maintain good government.” Hamilton would have argued that the elite legislature in Massachusetts was in fact acting in the best interest of the state as they “cannot receive any advantage,” and as such there was no need to rebel. Hamilton’s trust in the upper-class, and general distrust of the mass of the people, meant that he would have certainly been opposed to the…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However Jefferson had supported the average man unlike Hamilton who excluded the poor in his plans for the government and economy. Another example would be that Hamilton’s plan could become corrupted from the chosen few to become greedy and lead into tyranny. Jefferson had instead believed in divided power and in a weaker central government as he feared for a strong central government to take away liberty. The people participating in the federal government could be tempted to serve themselves rather than the people. Jefferson believed in the common people, calling them the “chosen people of God” (8). However Hamilton trusted only the rich and educated to partake in the government which would result with where the “poor would become poorer”…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary- Federalist Era, politics, parties, programs, policies, and people made an enormous difference in how the new nation should be structured and run. During this era, two men in particular championed politics and their respective parties. These two men were Alexander Hamilton, a Federalist, and Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican. Both Hamilton and Jefferson were successful college educated intellectuals and politicians who made significant contributions to the development of the United States policies and programs. However Hamilton, despite never being elected President, had more influence over the development of the United States’ policies and programs during the Revolutionary-Federalist Era. Historically Hamilton and Jefferson are known for agreeing to disagree over just about every policy being discussed during the establishment of government structure, and decorum. And it is Hamilton’s policies on economics, government structure, and constitution interpretation, which took precedent over Jefferson’s.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1” by voicing his beliefs that the U.S. will only survive with the creation of a Constitution. Without it, the country will not grow nor become the independent nation it strives to be, “The subject speaks its own importance; comprehending in its consequences nothing less than the existence of the union, the safety and welfare of the parts of which it is composed, the father of an empire in many respects the most interesting in the world” (Hamilton). Hamilton displays that the nation will only stand with a Constitution and it is the obligation of its citizens to form a government based on reason. Each society will choose to create a government that derives from fact or from force. Hamilton works to depict that the people of the United States are unlike any of their predecessors due to the ability to form a country that stems from logic and reason, “[T]o decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force” (Hamilton). It is due to their unique and crucial position which enables them to make decisions from reason, that the U.S. citizens must recount all information from both sides of the governmental…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aaron Burr’s image was greatly distorted after his assassination of Alexander Hamilton. This labeled as a murder to the public eye. The way a leader is perceived can either create or break their public life. Since Hamilton was very well known and beloved to the early Americans, it caused an uproar the entire nation. Therefore, with this enormous blow to his career, it was no longer seen as a leader that could be trusted. In the matter of leading, trust is the simple yet crucial building block to becoming an just and influential…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Crossen, Cynthia. "We Worship Jefferson, But We Have Become Hamilton 's America." Wall Street Journal - Eastern Edition, February 04, 2004., B1, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed November 5, 2012).…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In America, nearly everyone has heard the phrase, “We the people…” it’s a quote from our constitution- the very thing that drives the nation; but this isn’t true. The quote is referring to popular sovereignty which means that the people have complete power (in this case: government) and this has been the idea behind our government since the very birth of it. But when’s the last time you had ever had a say? I believe the term Popular Sovereignty should be reimagined in a way that it actually has an effect, because it hasn’t for centuries. You quite literally have no power when it comes to the government-- your votes, at its simplest form, do close to nothing and if you try to petition or protest you have an absurdly small chance of being heard…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays