Preview

Summary Of Final Notice By Van Fleisher

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
647 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Final Notice By Van Fleisher
Final Notice is a book written by Van Fleisher. It is a realistic fiction book that takes place in the United States. It addresses a pressing issue the United States is faced with presently. A group of scientists invents a device that resembles a watch for monitoring heart rates during exercises. It turns out this device can do much more than that. The device can give full medical diagnostics. It has a feature called the final notice that can tell when the wearer is going to die. This device initially seemed like a brilliant idea because there would be no incidence of sudden deaths due to health issues. The doctors will be notified about the deteriorating health of their patients. The wearer of the watch can make final arrangements, settle his or her will, say goodbye to their loved ones. Things get complicated when some people after receiving their final notice notification decide their final arrangements involve murder and getting revenge. Meanwhile, the NRA has increased their sales of guns and given a discount to senior citizens. This leads to mass shootings and suicides. …show more content…
His wife, Trudy, seemed to be against obtaining a gun initially until Vince is attacked by a vicious dog. They befriended a couple who happens to be hard-working and decent immigrants. This couple, who were Syrian immigrant often, discusses the unfair way some white Americans treat immigrants and other races. Americans seemed to have an insatiable appetite for weapons. It was observed that NRA was a law unto itself and wielded too much power. The government can barely do anything to stop the NRA or the sale of guns to anyone since they have many politicians on their payroll. They make different decisions to stand against the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    JeniceProctorWeek2Assignment
    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages

    JeniceProctorWeek2Assignment

    Gun control generally is considered laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, and use of firearms. High rates of homicides by way of firearms is the main reason why government officials are pushing for harder gun control measures. When you see news reports of school shootings such as Sandy Hook or Columbine, or the ridiculously number of high homicides by firearms, one can see why Congressional and government leaders are trying enact policies that limit gun control throughout the United States. States have various restrictions on the purchase, transportation, and possession of specific firearms. Federal law has made certain types of arms subject to special licenses and others illegal outright. Firearms that are illegal under Federal law cannot be legal under State law. Unfortunately, federal officials can’t come up with any uniform federal laws regarding gun control and therefore it falls on the states. Basically federal officials give an unfunded mandate for states to enact gun control measures. Congressional leaders with this mandate won’t give any money to fund these new measures throughout each state.…

    • 946 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Multiple Governments Week 5
    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Multiple Governments Week 5

    The federal Government is over the one that would have to change the overall laws and regulations but each individual state has the right to set their own gun laws as long as they still comply with the federal government. California for example has had many of these laws that are trying to be passed currently such as the ban of 30 round assault rifle magazines and require that the rifles have a bullet button which makes the rifle reloading a lengthier process. So in the long run the States and fed’s sometime work together and other times wont.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Outline Essay Example
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun Control Outline Essay Example

    Gun control is not strict enough. The United States government does not put down laws strict enough to deal with firearms.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment
    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Second Amendment

    Similar to that of the Second Amendment, argument is between those who are pro-guns versus anti-gun. Pro-gunners are advocating for, not more lenient laws but simply, that the government attempts to better enforce the laws that are already in existence. Comparatively those who are questioning the validity of the Second Amendment are appealing to the government to place stricter restrictions on the ownership and distribution of guns. Those who are pro-gun are supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the United States, whose arguments, based in the right to “freedom” as according to the Second Amendment, are directly hindering the progress of gun control. The NRA claims that “there are currently more than 20,000 firearms laws in the U.S., clearly more than enough to punish criminals who misuse firearms, but the laws have to be enforced” (Braga 2001, 545). However many of these 20000 laws are restricted by others, thus making them unenforceable and furthermore, many of these laws were created with the intention to be difficult to enforce (Braga 2001, 546). The NRA has undermined many of the laws in place by the “sponsoring of legislation that undermines the ability of the ATF agents to build cases against unregulated private sellers involved in firearms trafficking” (Braga, 2001, 546). Those involved in the making of laws towards…

    • 2491 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Sandy Hook Argumentative Essay
    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sandy Hook Argumentative Essay

    The second Amendment was put into place on December 15. 1971, and it reads “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This right was given to us so long ago, and now it is trying to be taken away from the Americans of the United States of America. The American Government has tried to limit pistol usage and the use of high powered rifles in America. In our country today many people want to feel safe and know that they are protected, but do you really think you are safe? An a individual that is robbing someone or hurting somebody does not care about gun laws! The government should not harass the normal civilian that has one gun in his household. The government should be catching the criminals that are using the weapons…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control In America Pros And Cons
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control In America Pros And Cons

    The nation's powerful gun lobby, the National Rifle Association, or NRA, says that the 2nd Amendment gives the right to keep and bear arms, which it most certainly says. This right is privileged and for those millions of people who choose to own guns either for safety or personal use. The NRA also believes that human behavior defects cannot be changed by a simple regulation of gun laws. They also state that gun laws would not have been able to stop most addicted killers from acting out. The goal of most members in the association is to educate people about guns. The association is willing to teach proper usage of guns to those thinking of getting or those that already have a gun. They think that this training could help reduce some of the tragedies involving guns including: hunting…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of School Shootings
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of School Shootings

    According to the Second Amendment in the U.S. Constitution, citizens have the right to bare arms; this meaning, the government also has to prevent such crimes and death from gun control. There is a huge debate on weather or not the government should restrict gun controls or permit them. The U.S. Constitution is not something that can be messed with. The government and the most powerful man in the world, Obama, cannot mess with the Constitution. As of right now, Obama is thinking about changing it up a little due to the current incident that occurred on October 1st, in Roseburg, Oregon.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of The Second Amendment To The Constitution
    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of The Second Amendment To The Constitution

    Twice in the past two years, the gun control issue has reached the nation’s highest court. In July 2010 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal right to bear arms applies at the state and local level (U.S. News). Guns do not kill people. People kill people. The National Rifle Association called the ruling a “landmark” decision, but the law did not really explain how it applied…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Is The Second Amendment: A Threat To Civilized People?
    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Is The Second Amendment: A Threat To Civilized People?

    The problem that splits gun control proponents from their opposition is the language of the second amendment of the constitution. The founding fathers of this nation believed that, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). This multifaceted sentence from the Bill of Rights brings many quarrels to life with its simple diction. It is very open to interpretation, which is what causes both sides of the debate to have “legal stances” on the matter. The National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the nation’s largest gun advocacy organization, is led by the philosophy that it, “[hosts] a wide range of firearms-related public interest activities of the National Rifle Association of America and other organizations that defend and foster the Second Amendment rights of all law-abiding Americans.” What gun advocates in the NRA often fail to understand, however, is the conscionable limits to the Second Amendment. As 27-year serving Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia stated in the majority opinion of the District of Columbia V. Heller decision, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited” (Scalia). This lead Scalia to also state that, “it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” These sanctions are legal proof that the second amendment allows for the government to regulate the distribution, ownership, and use of weapons. On top of that, Scalia, regarded as the most conservative justice, clearly highlights that gun control is useful and at times…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Should Not Be In Force
    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Should Not Be In Force

    Gun control should not be in force because it only affects the people who follow the laws. If weapons were banned, that is, putting gun control into effect, the people who follow laws won’t be able to protect themselves from people who don’t abide by the laws. The main purposes of fire arms is self- protection and hunting. So if the government tries to take our weapons away from us we can just throw the 2nd amendment at them and tell them that this is unconstitutional. We understand they are trying to cut down on crime, but it is actually making the crime rates go up. In Britain the government thought it would bring the crime/murder rate down but, it actually increased about 1 million more deaths each year. The government is trying to get is ammo they are trying to limit ammo manufactures to a certain amount of ammo a day. They are also making people go into havoc and making them go crazy over ammo, so people are buying…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Policy Paper
    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun Control Policy Paper

    Politicians use money to lobby against gun control bills. Politicians are influenced by anti-gun control lobby groups like the national rifle association. Politicians are threatened with recall election if they support gun control. In fact, politicians lose in their elections if they support gun control bills. The lack of the government in providing security to the American homesteads makes it even impossible to restrict and regulate ownership of guns (Mears, Hay, Gertz & Mancini, 2007).…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    NA Argumentative Analysis
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NA Argumentative Analysis

    The National Rifle Association established in 1871 with more than 5 million members, upholds the 2nd amendment and advocates enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crimes ( Statement on president Obama proposed executive nations on gun control, 2016). The NRA is a big reason senators like Manchin and Toomey oppose the president's statements. This is because the NRA goes to great lengths and spends huge amounts of money to defend the right to bear arms.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control, Hurting or Helping Americans?
    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control, Hurting or Helping Americans?

    Gun ownership is strongly guarded American right, but recent gun violence demands that lawmakers make the changes necessary to control guns more tightly. The National Rifle Association (NRA) demands that we protect our second amendment of the right to bear arms; however, major modification is needed. The U.S compares horribly to other countries in our statistics of gun violence. Recent shootings, such as the horrific Sandy Hook Elementary shooting, or the Aurora, CO movie theatre shooting, tell us clearly that we need to put some control on this. Even the fact that juvenile use of fire arms is even is existence should be enough to wake Congress up, and make them realize something needs to be done to protect U.S citizens.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against Gun Control
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Arguments Against Gun Control

    First, before discussing gun control itself we must understand the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics