Preview

Summary Of A Question Of Ethics By Jane Goodall

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
334 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of A Question Of Ethics By Jane Goodall
In her article, “A Question of Ethics”, Jane Goodall argues that animal testing research is unethical and ineffective and people should be aware that there are other alternatives that are helpful in noticing diseases as the advanced medical technologies. She questions whether it is ethical or not to use animals as test subjects for new drugs and vaccines. She asserts that scientists should avoid conducting unnecessarily experiments on animals in order not to cause suffering for them. Moreover, Goodall indicates that if animal testing is the only way available to decrease human suffering, it would be ethical for scientists to do such tests. However, if there are alternative tests available, it would be unethical for scientists to depend on animal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the end of the story Of Mice and Men, George faced the moral dilemma of killing his best friend Lennie or letting Lennie face the consequences of killing Curley’s wife. He made the right decision in killing Lennie. His reasoning behind it was mostly for Lennie’s benefit but there was a small portion of George that was glad to do the job. Although it would’ve been right morally for Lennie to be turned in to the police and face justice for his actions that just doesn’t happen due to the type of situation they’re in.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Instead of considering the lives of the animals, human lives are taken into precedence. They have "forced themselves to believe that animal testing is the only forward for medical research"(157). The researchers are almost thoughtless to other means and other possibilities to discover new drugs and vaccines. Goodall challenges the usage of animals even though advances in technology can substitute for them. The need of animals as subjects would be lessened. Yet, the researchers beliefs are almost written in stone into their minds. Even if the beliefs may be ethically right or ethically wrong. The alternatives to testing are not being explored…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical issues exist in all areas of criminal justice system (from passage of laws to punishment)…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the debate of whether animals have moral rights or not has been thrown around court rooms, social media, and protests. Arguments are made defending animals and suggesting that they should be protected and recognized in human society. Medical researchers are scrutinized and harassed by these supporters for their part in animal testing and medical investigation. Scientific breakthroughs have been made, which has transformed the development of modern medicine. Lifespans have elongated and lives are being saved in every corner of the world, yet somehow, this is still debated as if it is the wrong thing to do. Research animals are pertinent tools of the medical world and humans are entitled to use them as such. As human beings with…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    `”God loved the birds and invented trees. Man loved the birds and invented cages” (Deval, Jacques). There are many things wrong about animal research, and I think that a lot of it is wrong. Animal testing is wrong because it harms animals, animals’ rights are violated in tests, it is expensive, there are better alternatives, and the results of these tests aren’t always accurate or reliable.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Of Animal Testing

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals have been used in research for countless numbers of years, dating back all the way to BCE. The number of animals in testing has grown as the years have passed, and their purpose has resulted in treatments for lung cancer, childhood leukemia, breast cancer, and many others. When most people think about animal science, they think about the cruelty and immoral treatment of animals; they do not bother to think about the side effects of animal testing. The medicine we buy or are prescribed, the lotions we use, and everyday makeup we wear would not be available without the use of animals in labs. With all the benefits that come with animal testing, one might ask why anyone would be opposed to animal testing. However, an article entitled “Ethics…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of animal cruelty, there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them, animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years, using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side, the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about, as said in the title, how animal testing is helpful in finding cures for human diseases and that we should continue in doing so. The article states “This extraordinary development wouldn’t have been possible without animal research” (Trull 2). This shows how animal testing has helped out in finding cures for many illnesses in humans. Without the help of animals, we wouldn’t have the cures we have today. On the other hand, some people believe that animal testing is wrong and shouldn’t be done. According to the article “Killing Animals and Humans,” it states “...many differences – both obvious and very subtle – between humans and other species make animal experiments a waste of time, effort, money and lives – both human and animal.” (Animal Aid 6). Why test on animals…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some say that animal testing is morally wrong. That it should not be continued because it causes unnecessary harm to animals. However, laws were passed so that, “Procedures must ‘avoid or minimize discomfort, distress, and pain to the animals”(Evans, Kim Masters). In spite of these laws, people are still ambivalent about the moral aspect of animal testing, but these laws were passed for just that: to prevent extreme harm to the animals undergoing medical procedures and make sure it is morally acceptable.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many people that contest the utilization of animals for animal testing even though it is not an elementary concept. They present arguments that all animal research and testing should come to an end because it is wrong to treat animals like they are tools to obtain knowledge. They argue that alternative methods should be developed to end the practice of animal testing. An important piece of the open debate over every living creature's common sense entitlement fixates on the ethical position of a creature. The majority agree that animals have some ethical position and that is the reason it is wrong to mistreat pets or unnecessarily hurt different creatures. This alone speaks to a movement from a past view where creatures had no ethical position and treating a creature was more about keeping up human norms of nobility than honoring any fundamental freedoms of the creature. Today, the question has changed from whether creatures have a moral position to what rights accompany that position. Looking at this point of view, animals should have the same right as a human being, to live a free life without pain and suffering.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persuasive Animal Testing

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty,” says Albert Einstein. Testing on animals has always brought up an argument between people who think it is right or wrong. In the first place, experimenting on animals can be very dangerous and over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, or abused in US labs every year…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In different places of the world a lot of researches and product’s tests proceed by using animals. And for decades the debate of “should animals be used for these experiments?” has been inevitable. F. Barbara Orlans, in her book called “In The Name Of Science: Issues In Responsible Animal Experimentation”, says that the biomedical researches and testing the product’s safety are the experiments in which sixty percent of animals are being used. Maybe not all the people in the world see animals as me or as other humans that think like me. Not all the people see animals as species like us, with their own rights. There are a lot of people that see an animal as a “thing” that is been born for researches and for testing products for our safety. Another reason that animals should not bee used for these experiments is because not always the tests that are proceed in animal’s body have a successful end. So the suffer or the death of animals is not worth any profit to human. And the third reason is that they can use other ways to do these researches or tests, without the need of animals. Therefore people should stop using animals for their researches or for testing their new products.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays