Strike Is a Fair Means to Protest
Argumentative Essay
“Strike is a fair means to protest”
Does the topic not strike itself in a very controversial way which makes our thoughts argumentative? However, at present, to strike a fair means to protest has become a prominent issue not only to me but also for others. Specifically, the real moral of strike is to protect something by not affecting something else which is not related with any advancement. The main motto was to protect the nation from any harm in a democratic way. Through the passage of time, it has become that much destructive that it destroys our daily life style by creating economic, educational as well as social and individual problem, thus, from my point of view; strike cannot be a fair means of protesting in a democratic country like Bangladesh.
First of all, strike destroys our economic structure since public or private any institution cannot work for it. Strikers usually make procession on the street and they block the road. They also throw brick and many other dangerous things to the police when they come to control the situation. As a result, sometimes situation goes beyond control and people cannot go outside for doing any work with an apprehension of risk. Generally, all works are stopped for strike. From the history and culture of strike, we see the actual character of strike is that during strike people are prevented from attending to their jobs and traders are prevented from keeping their shops open or from carrying out their business activities. Also, workers are prevented from attending to their duties in the factories and other manufacturing establishments leading to loss in production and subsequent loss in the national economy. Moreover, strike creates uncertainty for future investment as well as it creates supplying disturbance which causes a great harm in our economy. In this regard, Dr Debapriya Bhattacharya says ” Strike causes financial loss of thousands of cores of Taka but harm abroad is more than the economic
“Strike is a fair means to protest”
Does the topic not strike itself in a very controversial way which makes our thoughts argumentative? However, at present, to strike a fair means to protest has become a prominent issue not only to me but also for others. Specifically, the real moral of strike is to protect something by not affecting something else which is not related with any advancement. The main motto was to protect the nation from any harm in a democratic way. Through the passage of time, it has become that much destructive that it destroys our daily life style by creating economic, educational as well as social and individual problem, thus, from my point of view; strike cannot be a fair means of protesting in a democratic country like Bangladesh.
First of all, strike destroys our economic structure since public or private any institution cannot work for it. Strikers usually make procession on the street and they block the road. They also throw brick and many other dangerous things to the police when they come to control the situation. As a result, sometimes situation goes beyond control and people cannot go outside for doing any work with an apprehension of risk. Generally, all works are stopped for strike. From the history and culture of strike, we see the actual character of strike is that during strike people are prevented from attending to their jobs and traders are prevented from keeping their shops open or from carrying out their business activities. Also, workers are prevented from attending to their duties in the factories and other manufacturing establishments leading to loss in production and subsequent loss in the national economy. Moreover, strike creates uncertainty for future investment as well as it creates supplying disturbance which causes a great harm in our economy. In this regard, Dr Debapriya Bhattacharya says ” Strike causes financial loss of thousands of cores of Taka but harm abroad is more than the economic