Preview

Strategic & Financial Valuation of Carlsberg a/S

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
20606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Strategic & Financial Valuation of Carlsberg a/S
Strategic and Financial Valuation of Carlsberg A/S

Master Thesis – Finance and Strategic Management 30th of September 2011

Cand. merc. FSM Department of Finance Copenhagen Business School

Author: Andri Stefánsson Supervisor: Carsten Kyhnauv

Strategic and Financial Valuation of Carlsberg A/S

Executive summary The main objective of this thesis was to determine the theoretical fair value of one Carlsberg A/S share on the 1st of March 2011. Carlsberg A/S is the world´s 4th largest brewery measured in sales volume and has acquired this position both through organic growth as well as acquisitions of its competitors as a part of the consolidation phase that the brewing industry has undergone in the past 10 years. In order to obtain the necessary understanding of the company´s business model, a strategic analysis was carried out both on an external as well as on an internal level. The strategic analysis showed that Carlsberg has a very strong product portfolio and one of its main strengths was innovation in regards to new products targeting new market segments. Being the 4th largest brewery in the world creates great economies of scale which are of importance. The strategic analysis also showed that the political and economical situation in Russia is of most threat to Carlsberg. The strategic analysis was followed by a financial analysis which showed that all key financial drivers rose upon till 2008 when the recent economic crisis hit and Carlsberg at the same time acquired Scottish & Newcastle. From 2009 the key financial drivers showed improvements both due to Carlsberg being able to make use of the synergies created as a part of the acquisition along with an increase in revenue and lower borrowing costs. The valuation was based on the DCF and EVA valuation models. Based on both models the theoretical fair price of one Carlsberg A/S share was determined to be DKK 649. This is 12.87% higher than the market price at the time indicating that the share is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Coca-cola total current assets were 39% and 34.83% in 2004 and 2005. Liquidity of PepsiCo decreased in 2005 and The Coca-cola increased in 2005. The assets of Coca-cola were 62% and 65.17% in 2004 and 2005. The current liabilities of PepsiCo were $6,753.00 and $9,406.00 in 2004 and 2005. The total assets were 24% and 29.65%. The total assets for Coca-cola were 35% and 33.43%. The liabilities of PepsiCo increased while the current debt of Coca-cola decreased. For both companies the total liabilities in 2005 were 55.08% and the total assets were 44.02%. The equity of PepsiCo was 48% of assets in 2004 and assets was 44.92% in 2005. In 2005 PepsiCo shareholder reduces the inventory. In 2005 the shares were 55.59% of assets for Coca-cola but in 2004 it showed shares there were only 51%. The shares for Coca-cola have been more than…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to compare the major players in the beverage/soft drink industry, Pepsi Co. & Coca Cola Co. This paper will give you sound information on which company to invest in as well as taking a deeper look at both companies over all. My analysis will be made based on the company’s income statements, horizontal, vertical analysis, balances sheets and financial statement ratios. This along with other information should give you a clear picture of which company is the best company to invest in.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Delaware Coors Case

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the potential profitability and market share of the Coors brand upon its implementation into the state of Delaware. By using the data collected by Manson and Associates, our team was able to identify an optimal selling price, total fixed costs, estimated variable costs, the breakeven point in units and dollars, breakeven market share, as well as an overall profitability analysis for 6-pack sales as well as keg sales.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A primary “goal for management is to maximize the current value of the firm’s stock” (Parrino, Kidwell, Bates, 2012, pg. 12). As a result, understanding the true value of stock is beneficial. Stock valuation is important to identify which stocks are more desirable and will maximize wealth. Since stock has an effect on business and one’s own portfolio, valuing stock is critical. Several methods to value stock exist however; there is no best method for this valuation. Each stock contains its own characteristics to analyze based on the company issuing it. One must analyze the business and stock to find the ideal stock valuation method. By comparing the market price of stock to the realized value in the stock valuation, one can determine whether a certain stock is the optimal choice.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In this paper, after reviewing and analyzing Appendix A Specimen Financial Statement for PepsiCo and Appendix B Specimen Financial Statement for the Coca Cola Company, I would be providing a financial comparison between the two most known beverages company in the world PepsiCo and Coca-Cola. I will be supporting my financial analysis by showing vertical, horizontal, and ratio financial analysis for both companies. To provide explanation as to what to find in each financial analysis; vertical analysis refers to assets, liabilities and equities as a percentage as a whole. It is a method where each entry for each of the categories in a balance sheet is represented as a proportion of the total account. Horizontal analysis is a method which is used for evaluating financial statements data over a specific period of time. It shows if the company’s performance is improving or decreasing and it can be expressed in numeric amounts or percentage amounts. Finally, the Ratio analysis is the calculation and comparison of ratios which are shown in the company’s financial statements. It determines or states if the company is worth investing in or not.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This growth is reasonable, as the premium beer brand makes up roughly 7% of the east region’s premium beer sales. At a growth rate of 0.25%, it would take 20+ years to reach the same market share in the light beer industry, more than enough time to establish a new brand awareness with a younger consumer. The loss of sales of premium beer to the new light beer market can vary between 5% and 20%. For the purposes of this analysis, the best and worst case (5% and 20%) is used. The key to the entire analysis revolves around the projected sales and eventual growth in the light beer market. The risk associated with introducing a new product is very high, and to meet the projected growth, additional advertising costs may be incurred. By producing a quality product associated with a strong brand name, these risks can be avoided. Based on the aforementioned market variables and projections, the net present value and breakeven analysis for first and second year of production was calculated for two scenarios: 1) 5% loss of premium beer sales 2) 20% loss of premium beer…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merging of United Airlines

    • 6678 Words
    • 27 Pages

    The United Continental Holdings Inc. (NYSE: UAL) became fully established on October 1st, 2010. Generally, the main rule concerning the acquisition of one firm by another is if the resulting collaboration generates positive net present value for shareholders; evidently, this is not guaranteed due to several complex procedures in the process of acquisition. The ContinentalUnited Merger was carried out through horizontal acquisition, and it’s progression over the 3year project life is what we have evaluated. In order to analyze how stock prices had been affected, the 5-year history of UAL was initially examined, and from this we derived how the merger affected current stockholders’ shares. Evidently, according to the CAPM extracted from the market risk, the returns are expected not to be of great value. The net present value was then analyzed by initially calculating the expected return, which provided us with a negative net present value. However, due to limitations of this particular approach, we assume that the project will yield higher returns over the 3-years. Therefore, other than the statistical approach, the regression model was used to account for the relationship between time and stock prices; which provided us with a positive net present value with the assumption that expected rate of return is constant throughout the 3 years. UAL’s cost of equity was extracted through calculations for the WACC, and the Du Point Identity allowed us to further investigate the company’s negative equity and ROE; putting emphasis on the significance of using accounting data for accurate predictions, rather than financial data. Finally,…

    • 6678 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Through this paper Pepsi and Coca Cola will be fully evaluated. A stock market analysis will be presented to a client as part of a professional consultation process. A background of both Pepsi and Coca will be accompanied in order to have a full synopsis of each company. The stock trends will be examined for both investment options. The stock trends will be based from the intial public offering day to January 2, 2012. Current events surrounding both companies will be displayed in order to assist the analysis. Lastly, we will analyze the financial statements of both companies. After a complete review of both companies a recommendation will be made as the better investment opportunity for the client.…

    • 3170 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limited Brands, Inc., like many other companies, saw a downturn in profits and revenues during the economic slowdown. Limited Brands owns companies such as Victoria’s Secret, The Limited, Bath and Body Works and others. Chairperson and CEO Leslie Wexner did not fear the economic crisis, she did not focus on things that were out of her control, but instead, focused on getting even closer to the customer. Wexner (2010) stated, “we had to be frugal with resources, time and money…we streamlined the business, stayed lean and quick and concentrated all our efforts on the few things that produce the biggest returns.” While there was a decline between 2009 and 2010, Wexner’s efforts paid off, as Limited Brands has seen an increase in profit margin during the 2010 year.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: The basis of competitive advantage for brewing industry is expanding its distribution chains with acquisitions or collaborations and mergers in exotic locations, logically controlling the cost of distributions, recognizing the appropriate market for beer segments and making products readily available and accessible to consumers. As the basic process of beer making is quiet straight forward and maintaining quality control and ensuring costs are closely managed in the production is challenging aspect of the brewing industry. Introducing new brands, setting a trend and keeping the established brands image fresh are also important for advantage.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We have noticed an increasing number of businesses catering to the recent rise of a new target market: the health-conscious consumer. At Nike, our goal has always been to give consumers what they want now, as well as to anticipate their future tastes, and to thus tailor our strategy to accommodate those tastes. We have recognized an unfilled market potential in the non-carbonated energizing sports drink arena, thus developing an entirely new product category.…

    • 2894 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Restaurants are, and will continue to be, an extremely profitable business. As a result, shareholders who have interest in brands such as McDonalds and Starbucks need not to worry about negative implications for the food giants compared to more risky industries. One company in particular, Yum! Brands (YUM), is another brand investors should become familiar with. Consumers may recognize the more specific stores the company owns such as Taco Bell and Pizza Hut, but investors should realize the sales and earnings growth associated with this organization. In addition, while there are many companies in the restaurant industry, Yum not only rings familiar with consumers like Starbucks, but Yum engenders excellent financial news at a level above its competitors.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pepsi in Cuba

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Based on the information in the case, Pepsi could invest US$360 million in exchange for 30% equity of Deltex. So we have to calculate the value of 30% equity of Deltex. First, we calculated the discount factor by using average unlevered beta of US independent bottlers, US 10 year Treasury bond as risk free rate and assuming market risk premium 10%. We came up with 9.83% of WACC. Next, we calculated Deltex free cash flow and terminal value and then converted them into US dollar value. Now with WACC and total cash flow, we had NPV of the company. So we deducted current debt from NPV and came up with the value of US$360M investment equal to 59.99% of Deltex equity. So the proposal to buy 30% of Deltex with US$360M is too expensive to PepsiCo and not attractive to PepsiCo.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grolsch Case Study

    • 12737 Words
    • 51 Pages

    In November 2007, SAB Miller, the world´s second largest brewer,1 announced the friendly takeover of the world’s 51st largest, Royal Grolsch N.V. of the Netherlands, for €816m in cash - 84% more than Grolsch’s value over the previous month. Nick Fell, SABMiller’s Marketing Director, explained the logic of the deal: “[Grolsch is] a fantastic brand. It’s North European, it’s a fantastic product, it’s got unimpeachable brewing credentials and authenticity and credibility. And it’s a damn good product. So for anybody interested in developing their premium beer business, this is an absolute peach of a brand to get hold of… we see huge potential for it in our global footprint, particularly in markets like Latin America and Africa where we’ve got a strong route to market but where the premium beer business is still in its infancy.”2 Grolsch had hitherto focused on developed markets, particularly the UK, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and France, in pursuit of its goal of becoming one of the world’s top 10 global beer brands. Groslch was already the world’s 21st largest global brand, measured by international (nondomestic) volume (see Exhibit 1). International volume had grown to account for slightly over onehalf of total volume and, going forward, seemed to offer much more potential. Drinkers often rated Grolsch higher than larger brands, including Heineken, the top global brand as well as the leader in Grolsch’s home market (see Exhibit 2). And Grolsch had started up a state-of-the art brewery in 2004 that could be expanded at little incremental cost. The acquisition closed and in February 2008, Grolsch became an independent subsidiary of SABMiller. Rob Snel, head of Grolsch International since 1999 and an employee since 1984, was named Grolsch’s new CEO shortly thereafter. He had to decide what changes, if any, to recommend to its global strategy.…

    • 12737 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the market value of a stock is lower than its intrinsic value, this stock is defined as “trades at a discount”. To figure out whether AGI stock is traded at a discount to comparable companies, as its management believed, we can simply apply multiple which comes from the average multiple of its comparable companies. Considering fluctuation of future after-tax earnings caused by the change in capital structure, we prefer to use TEV/EBITDA multiple in this case. Amtelecom Group consists of two lines of business which has to been taken into consideration. We separately calculate the value of both companies and their summation. In this way, we get a relative conservative outcome which indicates the Enterprise Value of AGI is 56.9 million (Note 1). As it is mentioned in the case that AGI’s current stock price implied a TEV of 53.7 million, the stock is really traded at a discount.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays