Preview

Stipends for College Athletes

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stipends for College Athletes
It’s about time: Stipends for College Athletes

Imagine being a college football star and finding out that a jersey representing your school with your name and number on the back is not only selling for $110 in stores nationally, but it is profiting higher than some professional sports jerseys. Now, imagine that you as that student-athlete will not be making a single penny off your institution using your name for monetary profit. Why you ask? Because according to the governing body of collegiate sports, the National Collegiate Athletic Association or NCAA, this would be considered an act that would bring an athlete out of his amateur status. Yet, it is okay to exploit that athlete’s talents as if he or she were a professional athlete and not compensate him or her. The NCAA started off as a small organization whose first objective was to solve an injury crisis in college football. However, with a growing governing power came more change. In 1852, Collegiate competition or “sport” made its debut in the form of a regatta race between Harvard and Yale (“Intercollegiate History of NCAA” 1). Soon after came the establishment of baseball and collegiate football. In the beginning, competition and funding was organized through student-run campaigns, and school officials had very little control over the intercollegiate sports movement. However, in 1905, after a number of deaths and serious injuries occurred to students playing collegiate football, a group of school officials were summoned together to make a
Kastel 2 series of rules that would emphasize safety within the sport. Just five years later in 1910, this group became established and came to be known as the NCAA (“History of Intercollegiate Athletics” 1). As the years progressed, the NCAA established sanctions not just for football but all sports. Most notably in 1950, the NCAA established that “Students could be awarded scholarships based on their athletic ability, but the funds had to be



Cited: "2011-2012 NCAA Division I Manual (August 2011)." NCAA Manual International, and Life – TheAtlantic.com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. 19 Nov. 2011. Fans. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. "Revenue Vs. Expenses." NCAA Public Home Page - NCAA.org. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. USATODAY.com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. "Winners and Losers In SEC TV Deal." College Gridiron 365. Web. 17 Nov. 2011.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After doing some research over a year ago and taking another look at this issue now, the question about paying college athletes has stayed the same. The debate whether to pay college athletes or not arose in the 1980s after Southern Methodist University was caught paying football players for their services. Upon discovery of these infractions, SMU was administered the “death penalty”, including loss of scholarships and no participation in bowl games for five years. The controversy surrounding paying college athletes seems to have risen from this unfortunate circumstance and has been cultivated into a huge social topic today. Following the SMU scandal in the late 1980s the NCAA rewrote their guidebook that describes an athlete’s role in an academic institution. According to the NCAA, “Student-athletes are students first and athletes second. They are not university employees who are paid for their labor” (NCAA.com). Looking at the arguments made by the NCAA, they make a valid point in showing how athletes are “compensated” for their participation in sports. According to the NCAA, “Many [athletes] receive athletics grants-in-aid that can be…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pay for Play

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ever since the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1905, their role in regulating intercollegiate athletics has involved many different tasks. These tasks include making athletics safe in order to prevent injury, marketing athletic events, regulating and changing rules in order to make college sports more fun for the fans, and enforcing the key principle of college sports: amateurism. Amateurism in college athletics means that athletes are unpaid. As a result, the NCAA has had to deal with deciding how to handle issuing and assigning monetary value of scholarships and grants. However, the NCAA has not had to manage the debate over college athletes getting paid to play. In a day where more and more college athletes are leaving college early to enter the professional leagues it is time to ask a question: Should division-I college athletes get paid? The question is based on the assumption that there is a place for college athletics within a university. The NCAA should be looked at economically because the universities within it generate profits through their athletic departments and operate as businesses by assessing costs, revenues, etc. With that assumption established, because of the market inefficiency and exploitative characteristics of the NCAA, division-I college athletes should get paid in a free-market environment. Division-I college athletes recognize that they are exploited and receiving a scholarship worth less than their market value, so they have no incentive to not cheat and accept illegal payments.…

    • 2844 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Athletes Be Paid

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Corruption, scandals, suspensions, firings and a systems that is systematically flawed all the while the fact of the matter is that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a organization that is bringing in billions of dollars each year yet the labor force generating the money gets a scholarship that many athletes believe doesn’t pay enough for everything that is needed on campus so this leads the author to have to take a look at if athletes need to be paid. I will outline numerous problems that are going on in college athletics and possible solutions to problems. I will take a look at the scholarship itself to determine if that is sufficient enough for campus life. The bottom line is from the outside looking in is that there is a lot money going into the hands of administrators and coach’s with none going into the people shedding the blood sweat and tears. It would seem that the system in place at times, wants to make the student athlete stand around with their hands out accepting all and any money that they can find from an outside source, which is in violation of NCAA bylaws concerning amateur sports.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are college athlete’s players or employees? The idea of paying a college athlete appears to be outrageous to some. The thought of giving someone money for something they have chosen to do may not appear to be fair. The greatest concern is where to draw the line. Should the decision be based on the amount of money and fame the program generates? Why should athletes be treated special and receive compensation for their contribution to the school? One major factor is that athletes make numerous sacrifices beyond that of a nonathletic student. Many athletes can’t seek employment to help offset the expenses of college because they are on the field or court for the majority of their day. Their time and effort is devoted to that of the school, thus potentially sacrificing their education. In many cases, athletes don’t receive funding for college, which means that not only are they paying financially, but physically to compete. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. If the athletes are fortunate enough to receive a scholarship, usually that is the only benefit. This in turn leads to taking out loans and having to look for other scholarships or sources of compensation, but this doesn’t stop them from being involved in the teams’ activities. The real question is why shouldn’t an athlete in college be paid to play? College athletes are the real moneymakers for the school, and they should be paid to play.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Branch, Taylor. "The Shame of College Sports. (Cover Story)." Atlantic Monthly (10727825) 308.3 (2011): 80-110. Academic Search Premier. Web. 10 Feb. 2013.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    For many students, the college experience is measured by the success of their NCAA-sanctioned athletic programs. Without the experience and athletic performance the student athlete brings, most colleges would not reap the benefit of these significant revenue-generating activities. At best, current NCAA regulations need to be revisited to ensure all avenues are addressed to enable the success of athletic students both in the classroom and on the field or court of play. As stated previously, even though students receive full and partial scholarships determined by their athletic performance, in both instances financial hardship is still experienced by many. Since the various professional sports’ programs reap the conditioning and experience of college student athletes, sponsorship initiatives should be pursued to allow student athletes some form of payment without creating additional outlays for colleges and universities.…

    • 3400 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The main problem with the current NCAA rule is that there hasn’t been a consistent plan to handle these sorts of cases. Until the NCAA develops a concrete layout of how to investigate and punish these incidents, there will continue to be turmoil and unease surrounding the NCAA. Collegiate athletic programs that have had athletes receive improper benefits should not be punished until there is a rule change to bring consistency to all cases. Continuing to hand out punishments to programs without a solid rule will extend the poor outlook on the NCAA, ruin athletic programs goals on the mistakes of young individuals. Also to provide the consistency of this rule, the NCAA has to be willing to provide compliance officers for each NCAA school.…

    • 3969 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Suggs, Welch. "The NCAA Debates the Meaning of Amateurism." Chronicle of Higher Education 46 (2000): 53-54.…

    • 3415 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question regarding whether or not college athletes should have the ability to receive financial compensation is one that has been an ongoing over the past decade. It is imperative that the president of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), Mr. Mark Emmert, reexamines this topic. Though the debate regarding the financial compensation of student…

    • 4416 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paying College Athletes

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Year after year, they put the madness in March. They bring traditions unlike any others to the network every Saturday of fall. They make millions upon millions of dollars for their respective universities. Yet, today’s college athletes see absolutely none of that money. Rod Gilmore, a football analyst for ESPN, in the article, “College Football Players Deserve Pay for Play,” claims that athletes should have a share in money in this multibillion-dollar entertainment industry. In fact, if they are given some sort of payment or gift, they risk suspension, expulsion, or even punishment towards their university. If the NCAA would revise rules that were set decades ago so that they would apply to the collegiate athlete of today, many problems that exist would be solved.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ncaa Football Playoff System

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Sherman, Ed. "NCAA Football Playoff Arrives At ‘Study ' Stage." Chicago Tribune. 22 Jan. 1994:1.…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, sports are no longer just fun and games, sports are now a business, and college sports are no different. College sports provide a huge source of universities’ income. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. With these sources of great revenue, comes the feeling of a “professionalization” of college athletics and in turn college athletes. The line between college athletes as Student-Athletes and college athletes as Athlete-Students has continued to blur, causing some major issues to arise with regards to athletics and academics. Some of the most primary issues currently affecting NCAA athletes are: academic support, the NBA age rule, eligibility and scholarships, and the academic progress rate (APR).…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NCAA (National Collegiate Association of Athletics) has many different rules and restrictions for Division 1 student athletes. A lot of these rules are controversial because of some of the NCAA 's own actions. Every year, many student athletes get either suspended or kicked off teams for disorderly conduct, or not abiding by the rules set by the NCAA. The NCAA is, and always has been, sternly against any student athletes receiving any type of profit for anything, unless they are working for it. Along with this, student athletes are not permitted too ever accept any money for participating in a college sport, and if they do this is a major violation and they will have consequences for breaking these rules.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nca Pros And Cons

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in 1906 as non-profit organization with the purpose of protecting students and setting official guidelines for sports. Since the formation of the NCAA in 1906, there has always been controversy of whether sports should be associated with universities and colleges. There have been numerous arguments attacking the NCAA suggesting that student-athletes are merely moneymakers for the institutions, rather than students, by earning millions of dollars in revenue each year in this commercialized industry. Academic enthusiasts contribute to the argument by emphasizing the importance of more money being invested into the athletic department rather then other departments throughout the school. However, these cons of the NCAA are heavily out weighed by the pros, as it’s proven that once schools enter the big time sports of NCAA they rarely leave it. Coltfelther supports this theory as he states that of the top 100 schools playing football in 1920, only…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marshall Plane Crash

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rebuilding the school’s football team was the last thing on the towns’ mind after the devastating accident, but the hot-headed injured members who did not attend the flight to East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina longed to carry on a football team the following year for their honor. One thing stood in their way, however. College teams in the NCAA were not allowed to legally start freshman students on the field to play (“Marshall University”). Marshall put together an all freshman team for the 1971 year from freshman athletes from other sports. The University was allowed to do this because the National Association of Athletes waived a ruling prohibiting it, but still putting together a new team was not easy (“Marshall University”). Finding a coaching staff was the hardest thing to do, which was the first thing that was needed to form the…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays