Preview

Statutory Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statutory Essay
GROUP 1 – 2ND QUESTION

Why is the purposive approach towards statutory interpretation the preferred principle to be applied in the interpretation of Constitution instruments and legislation in the Caribbean?

The doctrine of Separation of Powers is enshrined in the Constitutions of the Commonwealth Caribbean providing power to the legislature to make laws while providing the authority to the judiciary to interpret the laws. The interpretation of statutes is important as it helps establish judicial precedent which brings certainty and predictability to the administration of justice. However, there are difficulties in interpreting statutes, as Zander 1994 asserted, ‘statutory interpretation is a particular form of general problem-the understanding of meaning, or more broadly still, communication.’ To resolve the problems of interpretation, the courts have created rules of statutory interpretation. In the Commonwealth Caribbean, it is expected that the general rules of interpretation will apply to the written Constitutions and other legislations. The case laws have proven that in this contemporary period, the purposive approach of statutory interpretation is preferable in interpreting other legislation in the Caribbean. Also, Antoine purports that, it is now well-established that Commonwealth Caribbean Constitutions are to be interpreted purposely, bringing to life the important aims, objectives and values of the Constitution as a living social instrument. It is submitted that the purposive approach towards statutory interpretation is the preferred principle to be applied in the interpretation of Constitution instruments and legislation in the Caribbean because the approach seeks to promote the general legislative purpose underlying the provision in issue.
It is argued that the purposive approach has superseded other interpretation approaches because the purposive method gets closes to finding Parliament’s intentions. Lord Reid in Black-Clawson International Ltd

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Sections 51 & 52 assign legislative powers to Cth Parliament. • Characterisation = process of determining whether a law falls within one of these heads of power. • The question is whether the law relates to the subject matter or purpose of the heads of power in a way that allows it to be described as a law “with respect to” that head of power. • Simplest view of ‘characterisation’& the judicial review of legislation encapsulated by Roberts J in United States v Butler (1936)…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    manner and form explained

    • 5701 Words
    • 23 Pages

    The other change of importance is the increasing use of constitutional implications as a means of constraining legislative power. While the High Court has given some guidance as to the application of constitutional implications at the Commonwealth level,3 particularly with regard to the implied freedom of political communication, there is very little understanding of how (or even if) the same principles can be applied to State Constitutions.…

    • 5701 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Makes it clear that as far as possible United Kingdom courts should interpret the law in a way that is compatible with Convention rights.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PHL 612: Philosophy of Law

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages

    (17) Dworkin, Ronald. 1982. “Law as Interpretation”. Critical Inquiry, Volume 9, Number 1, The Politics of Interpretation (September 1982), pages 179-200.…

    • 5890 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    In the dissenting judgment made by Callinan J in the landmark New South Wales v Commonwealth (“Workchoices’ Case”), a strong criticism was mounted against constitutional interpretation methods employed in the judicial forum. Explicitly, this conjecture was focused at Isaacs J’s judgement in Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd (“Engineers’ Case”), where a textualism approach to constitutional interpretation was adopted. Callinan J expressed the Engineers’ Case as “less than satisfactory”, using “detached language” to discredit its literal methodology of interpreting the constitution. Such a claim is unsubstantiated and will thusly be deconstructed, so that it can clearly be seen that the approach taken in Engineers’ Case was manifestly apt for the purposes of constitutional interpretation.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 328a Essay

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Section 328A of the Criminal Code Act 1899 (QLD) relates to the offence of dangerous operation of a motor vehicle. It is stated that ‘a person who operates, or in any way interferes with the operation of, a vehicle dangerously in any place commits a misdemeanour’ (s 328A Criminal Code Act 1899, QLD). The main element in this section is established through the concept of ‘dangerously’. However, it is not clearly outlined in the Criminal Code Act 1899 (QLD), what encompasses the element of danger. In the past, when considering the concept of ‘danger’ in regards to s 328A, the jury was charged with deciding where the element of fault lay. This fault, did not necessarily need to be conscious. Rather, it involved any act that fell ‘below the care…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Statutory Interpretation

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To gain an explicit and profound competence of statutory interpretation and rules of statutory interpretation, they are few key elements and definition that must be referred to these concepts. Statutory interpretation is a source of law, which means, where laws are taken from to aid in the decision making process by the courts, and this is how the courts apply and interpret the legislations or acts of Parliament within a situation or a court case. To aid in the Courts’ application of the law, rules of statutory interpretation have been created; they are literal rule, golden rule and mischief or purposive rule. These are rules used by the courts to interpret the meaning of an Act. They are necessary because the meanings of an Act can be unclear, among other things, and these “rules” are used to make a judge’s task of reaching a clear understanding of an Act, much easier.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ”The uncertainties surrounding the scope and exercise of the royal prerogative give rise to serious constitutional questions concerning the rule of law in a democratic society.”…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Assignment

    • 2403 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Interpretation of the Australian Constitution has undergone significant changes throughout Australia’s Constitutional history. To highlight the number of different approaches, this paper will critique the method of constitutional interpretation used in Cole v Whitfield (“Cole”) with reference to the words “absolutely free” and compare it to the progressive approach in Rowe v Electoral Commissioner (“Rowe”). For completeness, this paper will outline any other major branches of interpretation not examined in Cole and Rowe. Then, the discussion will focus on the reasons for progressivism as the preferred approach for interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 2403 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence Course

    • 45867 Words
    • 184 Pages

    En Puerto Rico según Resumil (2000) la jurisprudencia e interpretación de las Reglas de Evidencia se consideran fuentes del Derecho Procesal Penal y establecen la forma en que el proceso habrá de llevarse a cabo reglamentando las etapas y la forma y manera en que los funcionarios del estado han de presentar la evidencia en contra de las personas imputadas de hechos delictivos. Además, la Constitución de Puerto Rico posee el poder de reglamentar los procedimientos judiciales. Sobre este particular el artículo V sección 6 establece que el Tribunal Supremo adoptará, para los tribunales, las reglas de evidencia, procedimiento civil y criminal que no menoscaben, amplíen o modifiquen derechos…

    • 45867 Words
    • 184 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Narative Essay

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    True Grit shows as a different trait in everyone; everybody shows it in a different way. The hero of the story does not always have what it takes or show the qualities that are needed to have this so called “true grit”. Each and every character in the novel, True Grit, has some kind of grit about them, as one can see though the actions of the characters and the way that they deal with adversity.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisprudence

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chapter Ten of the Constitution on judicial authority and legal systems is premised on the understanding of the sovereignty of the people who vest judicial authority on the courts and tribunals to exercise such authority guided by the principles of justice as in article 159(2) of the Constitution. These principles may be regarded as the standards or threshold for delivery of justice; they include:…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hardy

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Caribbean Court of Justice is a viable alternative to the Privy Council as a court of last resort for countries of the Commonwealth Caribbean…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. It would be wrong to ignore the question of legitimacy, but it is equally mistaken to behave as if it were the only important issue concerning judicial review of legislation. Other questions should be addressed first. Both critics and defenders of judicial review often proceed on the basis of questionable assumptions about the nature of judicial review. One assumption is that judicial review is always more or less the same activity, and that all forms of judicial review are (therefore) more or less equally legitimate or illegitimate. This paper draws attention to the differences between different forms and methods of judicial review of legislation, before briefly considering how we might decide whether some forms and methods are more legitimate than others. It deals only with primary legislation. Judicial review of subordinate or delegated legislation gives rise to interesting issues, but primary legislation lies at the heart of the argument about the legitimacy of judicial review.…

    • 5008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Courts, which is charged with achieving this difficult balance, carries out its task on the basis of the perceived intention of the Parliament by constructing the relevant statute granting the power to the body or authority. In doing so they read in between the lines or rather write in between lines of the statute, the presumed, implied intention of the Parliament. This is called the legal construct of the statute or statutory construction. Consequently, most of the Administrative law concepts and doctrines are Judge made law, which have to be read in conjunction with any statute delegating power to a official, body or tribunal.…

    • 3006 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics