Preview

Status of Women in Indian Society... a Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1378 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Status of Women in Indian Society... a Study
1)

Public Interest Litigation: The words `Public Interest' mean "the common well being also public welfare (Oxford English Dictionary 2nd Edn. Vol.Xll) and the word 'Litigation' means "a legal action including all proceedings therein, initiated in a court of law with the purpose of enforcing a right or seeking a remedy." Thus, the expression `Public Interest Litigation' means "some litigations conducted for the benefit of public or for removal of some public grievance." In simple words, public interest litigation means. any public spirited citizen can move/approach the court for the public cause (or public interest or public welfare) by filing a petition in the Supreme Court under Art.32 of the Constitution or in the High Court under Art.226 of the Constitution or before the Court of Magistrate under Sec. 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The seeds of the concept of public interest litigation were initially sown in India by Krishna Iyer J., in 1976 in Mumbai Kamagar Sabha vs. Abdul Thai (AIR 1976 SC 1455; 1976 (3) SCC 832) and was initiated in Akhil I3/taratiya Sos/ail Karnuu:hari Sangh (Raihvaiy vs, Union of India, wherein an unregistered association of workers was permitted to institute a writ petition under Art.32 of the Constitution for the redrcssal of common grievances. Krishna lyer J., enunciated the reasons for liberalization of the rule of Locus Standi in Fertilizer Corporation Kamgar vs. Union of India (AIR 1981 SC 149; 1981 (2) SCR 52) and the ideal of 'Public Interest Litigation' was blossomed in S.F. Gupta and others vs. Union of India, (AIR 1982 SC 149).

Judicial Activism: The expression `Judicial Activism' signifies the anxiety of courts to find out appropriate remedy to the aggrieved by formulating a new rule to settle the conflicting questions in the event of lawlessness or uncertain laws. The Judicial Activism in India can he witnessed with reference to the review power of the Supreme Court under Article 32 and I (belt Courts

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    central political authority is not seen as fair and proper, the litigants will seek personal…

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consitutional Review

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When people cannot get decisive action from their political leaders they are likely to turn to courts and judges instead. That is when any political group cannot gain electoral support…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    status of women

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer the following questions in 50 to 150 words each. Provide citations for all the sources you use.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Redress

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In view of the operations by the courts on a wider canvas of judicial review, a potent weapon was forged by the Supreme Court by way of public interest litigation (PIL) also known as social action litigation. The Supreme Court has ruled that where judicial redress is sought in respect of a legal injury or a legal wrong suffered by persons, who by reason of their poverty or disability are unable to approach the court for enforcement of their fundamental rights, any member of the public, acting bona fide can maintain an action for judicial redress. Thus, the underprivileged and the downtrodden have secured access to court through the agency of a public-spirited person or organization. This weapon was effectively used by the Supreme Court and…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Public Interest Litigation

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Earlier the aggrieved party person knock the doors for justice and seek remedy for grievance and the any other person who was not personally affected can’t take justice as a proxy for the victim or the aggrieved party. That means only the affected parties had the chance for locus standi to file a case and continue the litigation, but the non-affected persons didn’t had that chance. However, this has been changed when the post emergency supreme court set at rested the problem of access to justice by people through elementary changes and modifications made in the requirements of locus standi and of party aggrieved. The concept of the public interest has originated in the 1970 in the USA , as a strategic extension of the wider public interest law movement and…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The responsibilities of judges in disputes between the citizen and the state have increased together with the growth in governmental functions over the last century. The responsibility of the judiciary to protect citizens against unlawful acts of government has thus increased, and with it the need for the judiciary to be independent of government.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Status of Women in Manipur

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Meities (Manipuris dwelling in the valley region) are patrilineal and both patrilicol and virilocal. The society is governed by a highly organised administrative system existing from very ancient times. The history of Manipur is a revealing role of the people’s love for independence. In such a society, women not only brought a human element into the masculine world of justice and law, but they also wield considerable political power which influences state politics. Esteem for women is patent in traditional judicial system where women controlled their legal affairs and women were exempt from capital punishment. To this day, solidarity based on the market centre acts politically to influence affairs of the state. While men hold political authority through competition and a rigid hierarchy, the unassigned power of women works in a formal manner rather than in an egalitarian base. The two Nupi Lans (women’s war) and several other political activities in the recent years developed in the market centres of Manipur valley and perhaps increasing strength of this political action has led to the recent incidents in Manipur which saw a new trend in the social life of women involving young unmarried girls.…

    • 2189 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (PEOPLES ' COURT) - A VIBRANT - ADR - IN INDIA , (2002) 1 SCC (Jour)…

    • 30173 Words
    • 121 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the case of Chandra Sharma vs. Lenny Saint, which was filed on the first of June, 2005 suggested that the Ministry of Public Administration was not responsive to the request for freedom of information. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) which gives person the opportunity to have transparency on information about themselves, this was passed and the over a period of four years from 2000 to 2004 this act was neglected. The public service commission failed to meet the requirements of the act which resulted in several complaints from Mr Chandra Sharma’s constituents…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Renusagar Power Co. Ltd. v. General Electric Co. AIR 1994 SC 860, this Court considered Section 7(1) of the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 which inter alia provided that a foreign award may not be enforced under the said Act, if the Court dealing with the case is satisfied that the enforcement of the award will be contrary to the Public Policy. After elaborate discussion, the Court arrived at the conclusion that Public Policy comprehended in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 is the 'Public Policy of India' and does not cover the public policy of any other country. For giving meaning to the term 'Public Policy', the Court observed thus:-- "66. Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention of 1958 and Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act do not postulate refusal of recognition and enforcement of a foreign award on the ground that it is contrary to the law of the country of enforcement and the ground of challenge is confined to the recognition and enforcement being contrary to the public policy of the country in which the award is set to be enforced. There is nothing to indicate that the expression "public policy" in Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention and Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act is not used in the same sense in which it was used in Article I(c) of the Geneva Convention of 1927 and Section 7(1) of the Protocol and Convention Act of 1937. This would mean that "public policy" in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) has been used in a narrower sense and in order to attract to bar of public policy the enforcement of the award must invoke something more than the violation of the law of India. Since the Foreign Awards Act is concerned with recognition and enforcement of foreign awards which are governed by the principles of private international law, the expression "public policy" in Section 7(1)(b)(ii) of the Foreign Awards Act must necessarily…

    • 920 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - Refers to court orders and decisions of judges, justices, and prosecutors in response to interest groups and aggrieved individuals. When judicial decisions are sold or influenced based not on merits and evidences, and then the court would have served no purpose as balancer and equalizer of justice and settlement of disputes between and among litigants.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Food security Bill in India

    • 1935 Words
    • 13 Pages

    • 36 per cent have a body mass index (BMI) below the cut-off of 18.5 commonly…

    • 1935 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legislature and Judiciary

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There has been a game of tug of war between the legislature and judiciary from the early days of implementation of the constitution . The problem started when the judicial interpretation of property clause was considered as ambiguous by legislature and led to the amendment of the constitution .The tension between the legislature and judiciary has been discussed in paper on the basis of 3 points :1.’ the judicial approach to legislation particularly in the public welfare field’ ,2.’ the legislative reaction to judicial interpretations of the Constitution’ 3., the judicial attitude towards legislative privilege.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Interest Litigation

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Public-Interest Litigation (PIL, or जनहित याचिका) is litigation for the protection of the public interest. In Indian law, Article 32 of the Indian constitution contains a tool which directly joints the public with judiciary. A PIL may be introduced in a court of law by the court itself (suo motu), rather than the aggrieved party or another third party. For the exercise of the court's jurisdiction, it is not necessary for the victim of the violation of his or her rights to personally approach the court. In a PIL, the right to file suit is given to a member of the public by the courts through judicial activism. The member of the public may be a non-governmental organization (NGO), an institution or an individual. The Supreme Court of India, rejecting the criticism of judicial activism, has stated that the judiciary has stepped in to give direction because due to executive inaction, the laws enacted by Parliament and the state legislatures for the poor since independence have not been properly implemented.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before we dwell on the cause and features of judicial activism, let us first understand what it is. A modern democratic state is built on the principle of trichotomy of powers, i.e. the judiciary, executive and legislative have to perform their won designed functions. However, it has been observed that even in developed politics, the functioning of the legislative and executive leave a lot to be desired. Instead of being vigilant and acting is check on executive prosecution, legislative becomes its hand maiden. In addition, it is negligent in enacting laws. To fill the vacuum resulting from this legislative, executive malfunctioning, judiciary has to assert itself by providing relief to the sufferers of tyranny and by interpreting laws, which are either deficient or vague.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays