Preview

Statistical Performance Analysis of Complete and Incomplete Block Designs: a Comparison of Rcbd, Lattice and Alpha Lattice Designs Under a Sari Field Conditions

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12891 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Statistical Performance Analysis of Complete and Incomplete Block Designs: a Comparison of Rcbd, Lattice and Alpha Lattice Designs Under a Sari Field Conditions
Statistical Performance Analysis of Complete and Incomplete Block Designs: a Comparison of RCBD, Lattice Design and Alpha-Lattice Designs under SARI Field Conditions

By
Ashenafi Abebe

A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Statistics, School of Graduate Studies, College of Natural Science, Jimma University In Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of Masters of Science (MSc) Degree in Biostatistics

October, 2011 Jimma, Ethiopia
Statistical Performance Analysis of Complete and Incomplete Block Designs: a Comparison of RCBD, Lattice Design and Alpha-Lattice Designs under SARI Filed Conditions

M.Sc. Thesis

Ashenafi Abebe Gaenamo

October, 2011 Jimma, Ethiopia DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES JIMMA UNIVERSITY As thesis advisors, we hereby certify that we had read and evaluated the thesis prepared by Ashenafi Abebe under our guidance, which was entitled statistical “Statistical Performance Analysis of Complete and Incomplete Block Designs: a Comparison of RCBD, Lattice Design and Alpha-Lattice Designs under SARI Field Conditions”. We recommend that the thesis be submitted as it fulfills the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biostatistics. Yehenew Getachew (Asst Prof, PhD Scholar) ________________ _______________ Major advisor Signature Date Legesse Negash (PhD Scholar) ________________ _______________ Co- advisor Signature Date As the members of the board of examiners of Msc thesis open defense examination of Ashenafi Abebe Gaenamo, we certify that we have read and evaluated the thesis and examined the candidate. We recommend that the thesis be accepted as it fulfills the requirements



References: 1. Alves E. G., St. Aubyn, A. and Martins, A. (2009): Experimental designs for evaluation of genetic variability and selection of ancient grapevine varieties: a simulation study. Heredity Journals, 104(6):552‐562. 2. Atkinson A.C. and Bailey, R.A. (2001): One Hundred Years of the Design of Experiments on and off the Pages of “Biometrika”. Biometrica, 88(1): 53-97. 3. Bartley, M.S. 1936. Square-root transformation in analysis of variance. J.R. Stat. Soc. Suppl. 3:68-78 4 5. Campbell B.T. and Bauer, P.J. (2007): Improving the precision of cotton performance trials conducted on highly variable soils of the South-Eastern USA coastal plain. Blackwell synergy-plant breeding, 126, 622-627. 6. Cochran W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1957): Experimental Designs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. 7. Cox V.G. (1950): Experimental Design. Biometrics 6, 301-302. 8. Cullis B.R. and Gleeson A.C. (1991): Spatial Analysis of Field Experiments. An Extension to Two Dimensions. Biometrics 47, 1449-1460. 9. Das M.N. and Giri N.C. (1986). Design and analysis of experiments. New Age international Limited. 10. Day B.B. and Austin L. (1939): A Three-dimensional Lattice Design for Studies in Forest Genetics. J. Agr. Res., 59, 101-119. 11. Drane J.W. (1989): Compromises and Statistical Designs for Grazing Experiments in Grazing Research. Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy: 16, 69-83. 12. Edme S.J., Tai and J.D. Miller (2007): Relative Efficiency of Spatial Analysis for Non-replicated Early-stage Sugarcane Field Experiments. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 27: 89-104. 13. Eskridge K.M. (2008): Field Trial Designs in Plant Breeding. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 14. Gharde Y. (2000): Analysis of Covariance. I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi. 15. Girma T. A. (2002): Design and Analysis of Field Experiments in Agriculture. Ethiopian Agriculture Research Organization. Technical Manual No. 15, Addis Ababa. 16. Girma T. A. (2005): Using Spatial Modeling Techniques to Improve Data Analysis from Agricultural Field Trial. PhD Thesis of University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg. 17. Gomez K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984): Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; New York 18 19. Gwowen Shieh, Show-Li Jan (2004): The effectiveness of randomized complete block design. Statistica Neerlandica: 58(1): 111–124. 20 21. Hatfield J.L. (2000): Precision Agriculture and Environmental Quality: Challenges for Research and Education. U.S. Department of Agriculture, in Ames, Iowa. 22. Idrees N. and Khan M.I. (2009): Design improvement Using Uniformity Trials Experimental data. Pakistan Journal Agricultural Science. 46, Faisalabad 23 24. Karcher D.E., Richardson M.D., and Secks M.E (2003): Does Blocking Affect Experimental Efficiency on Sand-Based Putting Greens? Crop Science Society of America, 43: 2295-2297. 25. Kempton R.A., Seraphin J.C. and Sword A.M. (1994): Statistical Analysis of Two Dimensional Variations in Variety Yield Trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 122, 335-342. 26. Kuehl R.O (1994): Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA. 27. Leonardo Journal of sciences (2009), Issue 15 p. 71-8: Statistical Approaches in Analysis of Variance, Romania. 28. Little T. M. and Hills, F. J. (1978): Agricultural Experimentation, Design and Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 29. Mandefro N. (2005): Statistical procedures for Designed Experiments. Ethiopian Agriculture Research Organization, Addis Ababa. 30. Masoon A. A., Mujahid Y., Khan M.I., and Abid S. (2006): Improving precisions of Agricultural field Experiments. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3: 11-13. 31. Masood M. A., Farooq K., Mujahid Y. and Anwar M. Z. (2008): Improvement in Precision of Agricultural Field Experiments through Design and Analysis. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., 6(2): 89-91. 32. Montgomery D. C. (1991): Design and Analysis of Experiments. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 33. M. Kashifa M. I. , Khanb M. , Arifb M. Anwerc and M. Ijazc(2001): Journal of Scientific Research: 3 (1), 91-95: www.banglajol.info/index.php/JSR 34 35. Panse V.G. (1958): Status of Agricultural Experiments. F.A.O., Rome. 36. Patterson H.D. and Hunter E.A. (1983): The efficiency of incomplete block designs in National List and Recommended cereal variety trials. J. Agric. Sci., 101, 427-433. 37. Patterson H.D. and Williams E.R. (1976): A New Class of Resolvable Incomplete Block Designs. Biometrika, 63:83-92. 38. Pearce S.C. (1983): The Agricultural Field Experiments. A Statistical Examination of Theory and Practice. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 39. Raza I. and Masood M.A (2009): Efficiency of Lattice Design in Relation to Randomized Complete Block Design in Agricultural Field Experiments. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 22: 150-153. 40. Reza Hoshmand, A. (2006): Design of Experiments for Agriculture and the Natural Science, 2nd Edition: Daniel Webster College Nashua, New Hampshire, U.S.A. 41. Sharma V.K. (2000): Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi-110012. 42. Snedecor, G. and Cochran, W.G. 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University press. 43. Snyder E.B. (1962): Lattice and Compact Family Block Designs in Forest Genetics.U.S. Department of Agriculture, Gulfport, Mississippi. 44. Vas Es C.P. G. and Sellman M. (2007): Spatially-Balanced Complete Block Designs for field experiments. Cornell University, Ithaca, United States. Geoderma 140, 346-352. 45. Wu T. and Dutilleul P. (1999): Validity and Efficiency of Neighbor Analysis in Comparison with Classical Complete and Incomplete Block Analysis of Field Experiments. Agron. J. 91: 721-731. 46. Yates F. (1936): A New Method of Arranging Variety Trials Involving a Large Number of varieties. J. Agric. Sci. 26, 424-455. 47. Yates F. (1939): The Recovery of Inter-block Information in Variety Trials Arranged in Three-dimensional Lattices. Ann. Eugen. 9, 136-156. 48. Yau S.K. (1997): Efficiency of alpha-lattice designs in international variety yield trials of barley and wheat. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 128, 5-9.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2) In a clear and organized manner, outline your experimental design and describe the procedures you…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Materials and Methods: The materials and methods used during this experiment may be found in the laboratory manual (Lehman, p. 295-296). However some changes to the experiment procedure were made. Instead of five minutes, which was stated in the laboratory manual,…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Thesis: Biometric technology is used for a variety of many things, but its mostly dedicated to identify and verification methods.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dna Evidence

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry, Lee & Gaensslen, Robert.2001. Advances in Fingerprint Technology, 2nd Edition. Retrieved February 26, 2009. Available Online:…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7) Evaluate this claim “The Vitruvian man gives us an accurate method for predicting biometric data about someone, even when only one or two measurements of them are available. For example we can predict the height of someone quite accurately from their shoe size or their hand span”…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biometrics is a different and captivating field and this huge variety of the field is generally compounded with the help of behavioral and biological disparity in different individuals, which also makes it an exciting challenge in order to assess, arrange , and operate biometric installations. It is important to note that no matter the type of biometric identification process is used, the basics of how match decisions are made are similar in all biometrics. There are a number of computer systems which require a…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A website about NIMH

    • 1356 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Kesseler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikaangas, K. R., Walters, E. E. (2005).…

    • 1356 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Paper

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1800’s Francis Henry Galton undertook the first definitive study of fingerprints. He developed a methodology of classifying them for filing. In 1892 Galton published a book called “Fingerprints”. The book contained the first statistical proof supporting the uniqueness of his method of personal identification. Galton’s work went on to describe the basic principles of the present fingerprinting identification system that we use today.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: hicago Tribune, “Forensics under the microscope”, www.chicagotribune.com“Introduction to Biometrics”, www.biometrics.org “ Using DNA to solve crime”, www.justice.gov…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAB 5

    • 31937 Words
    • 128 Pages

    The experiments in this manual have been and may be conducted in a regular formal laboratory…

    • 31937 Words
    • 128 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Materials and methods for this laboratory followed those laid out in Experiment 6A on pages 56-59 of Essential Experiments for Chemistry by Morrison and Scodellaro with the following exceptions:…

    • 1905 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Technology Management

    • 6061 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Farrukh, C.J.P., Phaal, R., Probert, D.R., Gregory, M .J. and Wright, J. (2000a), 'Developing a…

    • 6061 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eksperimen

    • 10192 Words
    • 41 Pages

    Syllabus Design of Experiments |phone: |0811166866 | | | | |email: |Suparman_i@yahoo.com | |Office: |Pascasarjana UNINDRA | |Office Hours: |Jumat Saptu | | | | |Text: |Design and Analysis of Experiments | | |By Montgomery | | | | Silabus • Konsep Definisi • Exp with a Single Factor: ANOVA (Ch: 3) • Randomized Bloks (Ch: 4) • Latin Square (Ch: 4) • Factorial Design (Ch:5) • Two level Fractional Factorial Design (Ch:8) • Taguchi approach Final Grade Based on the Following |Homework |20% | |Presentation and Related Paper |35% | |Take Home or Final Exam (Simulation) |45% | [pic] [pic] [pic] Fifth Edition Douglas C. Montgomery ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY JOHN WILEY & SONS.…

    • 10192 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agriculture Staitistics

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Bibliography: Cochran, W.G. & Cox, G.M. (1957). Experimental Designs (Second edition), 611 pp. New York: Wiley.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tagum

    • 7691 Words
    • 31 Pages

    This study was conducted to determine the Implementation of the Palayamanan-Kabuhayan Project: Kinalangay Nuevo Experience. Specifically, the study aimed to determine the demographic profile of the 53 respondents, their reasons for participating in the project; the project characteristics such as kind, years spent, and technology introduced. It also looked into the extension methods employed, their increase in income, marketing strategies, benefits gained, assistance given by partner agencies, technology being used until now, and reasons for non-sustainability of the project.…

    • 7691 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays