Preview

State of Confusion - Paper 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State of Confusion - Paper 1
Scenario
The State of Confusion enacted a statute requiring all trucks and towing trailers that use its highways to use a B-type truck hitch. This hitch is manufactured by only one manufacturer in Confusion. The result of this statutory requirement is that any trucker who wants to drive through Confusion must stop and have the new hitch installed, or detour around the State of Confusion. The federal government has no regulations concerning these truck hitches. Tanya Trucker, who owns a trucking company headquartered in the State of Denial, is not happy about the additional expense this statute imposes on her business. She intends to file suit against the State of Confusion to overturn the statute.

Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).
This venue is a determination of the most appropriate location for litigating a dispute. “While jurisdiction requires an analysis of whether a court has authority over a particular case, venue is the legal concept that defines the most appropriate location for the trial. Two or more courts will sometimes have jurisdiction over the very same matter, but it would be more appropriate from a fairness perspective to hear the case in a particular location” (Melvin, 2012, p.59). If Tanya Trucker desires to file a lawsuit against the State of Confusion to overturn the statute they have enforced she must understand which jurisdiction to file in. Initially, Tanya Trucker must decide in which court to file the lawsuit. The court selected must have jurisdiction over the case of this type of dispute. The venue where Tanya Trucker should file her suit is with the court of



References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Law2. 2012. Commerce Clause Limitation on State Regulation. Retrieved from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/statecommerce.htm Law.Cornell. 2012. Amendment X. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A court is required to use long-arm jurisdiction over persons and businesses in another State when a civil wrong is committed within a State; when there is a contract in the State or a contract affects the State and when a business is transacted that allegedly cause injury to another person. “long arm jurisdiction is a statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over foreign ("foreign" meaning out-of-state) defendants. A state's ability to confer jurisdiction is limited by the Constitution. This jurisdiction permits a court to hear a case against a defendant and enter a binding judgment against a defendant…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75,000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken, to Frigaliment. 50,000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping the larger chicken not to their expectations. Frigaliment protested the rest of the shipments. B.N.S said that their only obligations was to ship chicken that met the requirements stated in the contract.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On the occasion in question, defendant, Anheuser-Busch, and their employee Frank Cuellar failed to maintain a safe driving experience with a secure load..…

    • 340 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. On or about April 8, 2013, Justin King won the national regional idol MCI contest in Chicago. A few days later, King met with his agent to discuss signing a legal document three year contract for over 275,000 dollars. After leaving the meeting with his agent, King took interstate 57 just South of Chicago. Plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. On the same occasion, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a beer truck owned by Anheuser- Busch, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, a highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. On occurrence, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the occasion in question, defendant, Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., the defendant failed to secure the cargo on his truck causing them to fall into the plaintiff’s path.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Court should grant the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment because this Court should apply the law of East Kansas. This case involves a conflict of law issue because West Kansas’s law provides that worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for employees, who are victims of intentional torts, while East Kansas says that worker’s compensation is not the exclusive remedy. Under the governmental interest approach to conflicts of law, this Court should resolve this conflict in favor of East Kansas because it has an interest in applying its law, while West Kansas does not.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CarrieWhite unit6 Seminar

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Then you went over jurisdiction of a court refers to those in cases in which it may exercise lawful authority which is determined by statute or constitution. The question that you asked I honestly think that answer would be yes. Then you went over the state court system many differences among state courts which use three tiered structure which are trial courts of limited jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction,…

    • 582 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An important concept this week is jurisdiction. As the text explains, a court must have subject matter jurisdiction to hear a case. Subject matter jurisdiction is rather straight forward - the court must have jurisdic tion to hear the particular type of dispute (see my video for further explanation of this concept).…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Homework Assignment 5

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear and decide cases. There are several types; a few are Appellate Jurisdiction, General Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction. Appellate is a court that hears a case an appeal from a lower court. General is a court that hears various kinds of cases in general. Subject Matter is a court that can hear only certain kinds of cases listed in the federal statutes and constitution. Personal is a court that makes decisions binding on the person involved in a civil case.…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The authority of a court to hear and decide cases is called the jurisdiction. When a case is first brought to court is the authority of the original jurisdiction. When there is an error of law and the courts need to review the case, they will go to the appellate jurisdiction. When the court has the power to hear any case, this is called general jurisdiction. Special jurisdiction is where the court has the authority to hear exceptional circumstances. A particular…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisdiction of the Court shall be exercisable…

    • 2884 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Essay

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The project you will undertake today reflects the tasks we have undertaken on a weekly basis in your class sessions. Therefore your task is to repeat the process we used in class to undertake your own project.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear a case. For example federal court hears federal laws, where a state court hears states laws and a civil court hears civil cases. State courts would never hear federal issues because of jurisdiction(Miller & Jentz, 2010).…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays