Preview

Stanford Prison Experiment By Zimbardo

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanford Prison Experiment By Zimbardo
This essay is designed in two parts. The first part of the essay will attempt to explain ethics in a general context and evaluate the reasons why we need ethics when people undertake research. The second part of the essay will focus on the Stanford Prison Experiment, by Zimbardo in 1971 and critically analyse its relation to and impact on ethics.

Ethics is involved in many parts of human life. One example is to guide humans to make decisions (Darwall, 1998). Humans make decisions because these decisions are fundamental in achieving the basic needs, goals or values for living. These decisions could influence our feelings and sensations, i.e., we buy food because we are hungry, we work because we need money to maintain our well being, women
…show more content…
Without research, many questions about certain areas i.e., history, human behaviours, treatment for specific diseases, not only will go unanswered, but research also allows the human world to improve from mistakes. The definition of scientific research is a methodical study that involves a systematic investigation of theories and hypotheses (Humber, 2015). Given that the nature of scientific research is about solving unanswered questions and testing theories for improvement, it is very important that this research is conducted to the highest standards, including morally. That is, if research is not well controlled, errors such as fabricating, falsifying, or misrepresenting data or findings can easily occur, which may jeopardise the participants’ health and safety. Two good examples would be the Nuremberg War Crimes following World War II when captive human subjects were used in gruesome experiments (Smith, 2011) and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study when infected African-American participants were excluded from treatment (Thomas and Quinn, …show more content…
Rensik (2011) reported that adhering to ethics in research can minimise harm and improve accountability, fairness, as well as honesty in several aspects of research. First, it could promote the aims of research. Second, it made people recognise the values and importance of collaborative work. Third, it ensured that the researchers and the research were accountable to the public. Fourth, it facilitated public support for the research and finally, it protected other important moral and social values, i.e., animal welfare, human rights, confidentiality. In short, applying ethics to scientific research improves the standards of research by providing a set of disciplinary conducts that monitor every stage of research, i.e., method,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tuskegee, Alabama is important in the history of American bioethics because it catalyzed the formation of written, mandatory ethical principles. To explain, prior to this event, there was a general consensus amongst researchers that Americans will not overstep the bounds of research, not like the Nazis did. However, the Tuskegee Syphilis studies made it apparent that unless there are core ethical principles to follow, America might head in the same direction as Nazi Germany. The researchers in the Syphilis studies did not receive informed consent from the participants, and withheld treatment that was available. As this event received publicity, the US government knew it had to respond. Thus came the birth of bioethics, and the core ethical principles (Belmont Report) researchers must follow: Autonomy, Justice, Beneficence. Along with the principles, the IRB, a committee that approves and monitors research, was also established. This is why Tuskegee, Alabama is important.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can good, moral, and virtuous people be pushed to do bad things? This article seeks to compare an experiment done in 1971 to a real life military situation during wartime. The article also tries to link the experiment to another horrible act done by someone suffering from various mental illnesses with extremely mixed results. Is there a correlation between these three events as far as the mental states of the participants?…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus 642 Week 2 Discussion

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Resnik, David B., Thomas and Ben Worthen. (n.d.). What is Ethics in Research & Why is it Important? Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Research in science is an investigation that is bound by rules to establish rational explanation. The information used in scientific research should only be proven reputable information; untrustworthy information will result in faulty research. Research and the information gathered has to be represented with accuracy and without bias. There are three approaches to take to ensure research is sound (Camfield & Palmer-Jones, 2013). The first important manner to take into consideration is if the research derives from a philosophical approach. When asking a question it is imperative to understand the motivation behind comprehension using a rational thought process. The second vital step when conducting research is using methodology. This practice of theoretical analysis insures the design and conduct of the study is committed in such a way that is to be regarded as trustworthy. Last is the researcher’s obligation of ethics. Knowing the difference between right and wrong can be complex at times to rationalize by some. It is important to understand that knowing the difference between right and wrong in a personal concept is different from knowing what is right and wrong by others.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people desire some sort of power. Whether it is political power or economic power, this yearning runs our society. Some people use their power to benefit others, and other person inappropriately use their power to degrade and diminish. As explored in the Stanford Prison Experiment, Philip Zimbardo states people change with they are given “power without oversight” (Zimbardo, The Psychology of Evil, TedTalk). Though the students were considered “good apples,” the combination of situation and the system caused the guards to lose their identities and to abuse their power in inhumane ways. The results of the experiment were derived many observations and conclusions about the subjects; however, Zimbardo’s switch between running the experiment…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The students involved in the Zimbardo Prison Experiment were not cruel people, nor were they truly sadistic. When given the roles as prison guards and prisoners, their behaviors changed dramatically. As prison guards, normally friendly students acted as prison guards under the warden. Under the authority of the guards, the students with the roles of prisoners acted unnaturally and did as the guards told them. Similarly, the soldiers in Germany under Hitler's command did as they were told and acted as they did, not because they were bad people, but because of their positions in German society. They were soldiers and did as a German soldier under Hitler would do. Neither prison guard nor soldier acted aggressively because of their own personalities,…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This study was conducted by Professor Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to find out if a situation can control the person or can an individual’s beliefs, attitude and values would allow one to rise above their current situation. He wanted to look more in-depth in the behavioral and sociological consequences in the roles of the guard and prisoner. Also, he wanted to find out why and how social situations can overwhelm people. In order to find study subjects, Zimbardo advertised in the paper for healthy, male students and offered $15 a day for up to two weeks. His subjects were predominately white, middle class students with no history of drug use or a criminal record. The basement of Stanford’s psychology department…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this assignment, I will be discussing the ethical issues relating to research in health and social care.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 Phillip Zimbardo conducted a controversial study know as the Stanford prison experiment. The experiment was a psychological study of human reactions to being imprisoned and how the effects would interfere with the normal behaviors of both authorities and the inmates in prison. Zimbardo and his team hypothesized “that prison guards and convicts were self selecting of a certain disposition that would naturally lead to poor conditions.” Zimbardo used undergraduate volunteers to play the roles of the guards and the prisoners in a mock prison he created in the basement of the Stanford psychology building. He then recorded how both the prisoners and guards quickly adapted to their roles, and soon this lead to one-third of the authorities taking place in sadistic acts towards the prisoners, which was argued to have lead to psychologically harmful situations. Due to the appalling conditions of the prison, both sanitarily and psychologically the experiment ended on August 30, 1971 just six days after it began, which was eight days short of the foresighted fourteen days it was supposed to have lasted. Many similarities in the ethical concerns of the Stanford experiment were found in the Milgram experiment which was conducted in 1961 by Stanley Milgram one of Zimbardo’s high school friends.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays