Preview

Stand Your Ground Law Debate "Cons"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stand Your Ground Law Debate "Cons"
Title: stand Your Ground Law
Thesis: The Federalist Papers influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution.

I. Introduction
a. Describe The Federalist Papers are and when they started
b. Thesis: The Federalist influenced the ratification of the Constitution by making some of their most important arguments, including the importance of being in a Union by having a Constitution, answering to the objections made by the Anti-federalists about separation of powers, and defending opposing arguments made against the characteristics of the executive and judicial branch as provided in the Constitution. II. Background
a. State when The Federalist was printed and published.
b. Discuss the intentions and purposes of The Federalist. III. Argument for the benefit of a Union
a. A Union would guard against external dangers
b. A Union would guard against internal dangers
A. The “extended sphere” argument about how it will control factions. (Federalist 10) IV. Argument of the problem with complete separation of powers
a. Anti-federalists wanted a complete separation of the judicial, executive, and legislative branches
b. The Federalist said the maxim of complete separation of powers is misunderstood. (Montesquieu)
c. The branches need some limited power of the other branches to protect themselves from encroachment of the other branches (Federalist 51)
A. The branches need to have the interests of maintaining their powers, and not letting the other branches take that away. V. Argument for a single executive, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Also, The Congress were able to tax on goods, to manage interstate trade. The Constitution proclaimed all acts created by Congress to be unchangeable on the states. Analysis: The three branches made the systems of checks and balances organized. This helped maintain and balance out the controll of the central governemnt because no individual or union obtained too much power. Next off, by dividing the government…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    9. What powers did the national government lack under The Articles of Confederation? What branch of government ran the nation?…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    h. What are some of the historical events that shaped the formation of the U.S. federal government? Select one event you think had a major effect on the federal government. How does this event affect U.S. citizens today?…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNIT ONE ESSAY QUESTIONS

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Analyze the degree to which the Articles of Confederation provided an effective form of government with respect to any TWO of the following:…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People elects a person to the house of representatives and supreme court, so person wouldn’t have too much power : dangerous for the U.S. They divided the gov’t powers into three independent parts to prevent tranny. In Document C there aim was to divide and arrange the several offices into the three branches, so they won’t be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other. Tranny was prevented by giving each branch powers to block the other branches. I’m showing that without the three branches in the constitution the branches would make any rule they want without having someone telling them…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e. To set new tax rates in the colonies in response to a request from Parliament…

    • 1761 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stand Your Ground Law varies in language depending on the state. Some States have not yet adopted this particular law. Although there is no set definition on this law, the Stand Your Ground law means that under certain circumstances individuals can use force to defend themselves without first attempting to retreat from danger. In simpler terms, if you come into contact with someone who infuses danger upon you or others, instead of running away you stay and defend yourself. The main idea is self-defense, many states claim that self-defense under this law offers immunity from prosecution rather than an affirmative defense. Therefore, instead of presenting a self- defense argument at an assault trial, one could in its place claim self-defense…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to research done by Mark Hoekstra, an economist with Texas A&M University who has thoroughly examined “stand your ground” laws, there are a total of about 14,000 homicides taking place annually in the United States (11). A homicide, in this case, refers to one person unlawfully killing another. That is a fairly high number and it didn’t used to be that high. It has risen significantly since “stand your ground” laws have been implemented into 22 states across the United States. These laws give people the right to use deadly force in a situation in which they feel threatened no matter where they are as long as they have a legal right to be there (Mayors 1). These laws were put into place to benefit our society, but it can be proven that they have not been successfully benefitting our society as a whole because while they do give people the peace of mind that they have the right to protect themselves without fearing the consequences they may have before had to face afterwards, they have also resulted in many more deaths that before that could have been avoided if the person sensing danger had first tried to somehow escape the situation they were in before resorting to violence.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had more people at the time, but they were diverse and uncoordinated. The Federalists wrote over 80 essays, called The Federalist Papers, stating their positions; they were also able to successfully make the Anti-Federalists understand that the constitution was flexible and would allow some aspects of The Bill of Rights in the document. Federalists claimed that their Constitution would bring more democracy to the nation. They also brought attention to the economic and commercial state, all of which was greatly damaged after the Revolutionary…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stand your ground law allows a person to use deadly force on another person not just in or on their property, but where ever they may be as long as they have the right to be there. In this law you don’t have no duty to retreat or ask question. They have the right to stand their ground by deadly force it they feel it is necessary. If the person is not engaged in unlawful activities, and if the person is attacked they have the right to use deadly force. I ideal is to protect yourself at all any cost.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1781, the Articles of Confederation were written in order to secure the states' rights. This document lacked many qualities necessary for a successful government, and therefore caused a great deal of debate concerning the ratification of a new system. Federalists advocated the passing of a new Constitution, welcoming the tie it would establish between states and the creation of a strong central government. Opposing the constitution were the anti-federalists, threatened by its ability to eliminate their liberties just as they were previously executed by King George III.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Federalist Papers-aimed to convince Americans to accept the new Constitution. Published in New York. Written by Hamilton, Madison, Jay. Patrick Henry of Virginia and George Clinton argued against the constitution saying it takes away individual rights, replicates monarchy, and doesn’t have a bill or rights, and was illegal. The federalists had Franklin & Washington in their meetings=major plus. Led the Federalists to add a Bill of Rights. Clinton also published essay under the name “Cato” going against the constitution. See antifederalists, Hamilton.…

    • 3959 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ddekada 70

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. The observance of the principle of separation of powers and the system of checks and balance…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays