Preview

Stakeholders: Large Firms

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
972 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stakeholders: Large Firms
It could be said that “large corporations abuse their power against stakeholders e.g. customers, employees, suppliers, public, communities”. Do you agree or disagree? Explain what you answer is and why have you reached that conclusion. You are to include a clear rational argument for your case that has strong examples to support your thinking.

Unlike shareholders who are solely interested in return dividends and share price growth, stakeholders have wide variety of interests in how companies operate. Freeman (1984) stated that stakeholders are, “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization’s objectives”. The main objective for firms is profit maximization and for this reason I agree to a certain extent that large corporations abuse their power against stakeholders.

Firstly, Customers, “provide the lifeblood for the firm in the form of revenue.” (Freeman 1984). Firms are reliant on customers as they indirectly fund the development and growth of firms. However, customers want value for money and “cheap” prices. There are many companies that exploit the customer and as a result gain supernormal/abnormal profits. For example, the company British gas, who reported an 11% increase in profit to £606m despite the energy cost increases. As a result many questions were asked over the fairness of energy bill increases especially in this economic climate. Therefore this highlights that the large corporation has abused the stakeholder in this instance.

Employees expect security, benefits and wages in return for their work. Their economic well being is fully reliant on the firm, making them important stakeholders. However, many firms exploit workers in order to generate high profit or simply replace workers with machines and technology. For example, the Taiwan iPhone manufacturer was accused of ill treatment and low wages (5p per hour) to its employees after a spate of suicides among its employees. Now the company have



References: BBC, 8 December 2012, “UK Uncut protests over Starbucks “tax avoidance”, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20650945, Bunn. D, Grant T. Savage, Betsy B. Holloway, (2002),"Stakeholder analysis for multi-sector innovations", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 17 Iss: 2 pp. 181 - 203 Cooper, L.G. (2000), “Strategic marketing planning for radically new products ' ', Journal of Marketing,Vol.64,pp.1-16. Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston, MA. p.46,43,48 The Guardian, August 2011, “Taiwan iPhone manufacturer replaces Chinese workers with robots”http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/01/foxconn-robots-replace-chinese-workers. Sky News, 27 February 2013, “British Gas Sees Profit up to 11% to £606m”, http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/british-gas-sees-profit-11-070722683.html Yvon Pesqueux, Salma Damak-Ayadi, (2005),"Stakeholder theory in perspective", Corporate Governance, Vol. 5 Iss: 2 pp. 5 - 21

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In their relentless pursuit of profit corporations throughout history were involved in human rights abuses. From slave labor in the Americas to forced labor in Nazi concentration camps. This corporate trend of human exploitation continues today.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder for Staples

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Stakeholders are individuals and constituencies that contribute, either voluntarily or involuntarily, to its wealth-creating capacity and activities, and who are therefore its potential beneficiaries and/or risk bearers1. There are several different types of stakeholders associated with a corporation, and those stakeholders can have different views and opinions on what corporation 's goals should be and how they should be running. I have interviewed three different stakeholders of Staples Inc., an employee, a customer and a stock holder, to find their relationship between them and the firm. Then, I will use this information to suggest how the firm should proceed and continue to have a better and more beneficial relationship with its stakeholders.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Stakeholder theory. (n.d.). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 14:20, May 10, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stakeholder_theory&oldid=491732196…

    • 3580 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qantas' Stakeholders

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stakeholders are all groups and individuals who have an interest in the company being analysed. In order to focus on these groups which have the power to influence, corporate level activities have to be identified first. This can include large shareholders, governments and trade unions. The power and interest of those stakeholder groups have an impact on the process by which strategy develops at the corporate level and in each individual business. (Williamson et al, 2004, pg. 9)…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Buchholz, R.A., & Rosenthal, S. B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Government Matters. [Academic Journal]. Journal of Business Ethics. Part 1, Vol. 51 Issue 2, p143-153. 11p, Database: Business Source Complete…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman vs Freeman

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Management serving only the interest of stockholders is already significantly restricted by laws and economic logic. Freeman argues that the owners’ claim on a company is worth the same as employees’, suppliers’, customers’ and the local community’s claims. All stakeholders maintain a reciprocal relationship of rendering and receiving resources to and from the corporation. Managers must act as balance-maintainers of stakeholder interests to guarantee the sheer existence of the corporation and not out of altruistic reasons. Freeman’s approach is not static but comprises a constant reconciliation of stakeholder interests based on certain ground rules (“doctrine”) that is intended to guide the process to corporate constitutions, similar to government constitutions with all stakeholders as equal parties.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zara Case Study

    • 6040 Words
    • 25 Pages

    as opposing Shareholders rights to obtain fair revenue for their investment. In this paper, we argue…

    • 6040 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rampling, P N, From Agency to Stakeholder Theory: Realigning Executives Focus (August 17, 2012). Available at SSRN:…

    • 3862 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder can be defined as a party that affects or can be affected by the actions of the business[2], which may be include shareholder, creditors, employees, customer, supplier and government. Under the principle of the company law, directors and officers owe duties to the company as a whole but not to the other person or group rather that shareholder as they are the residual owners of the company’s assets. As a result, it can be said that a scope is limited by the statutory duties to the company’ director and officer is to act the best interest of shareholder, any benefit is acting on the other group of the stakeholder (such as the creditor) will beyond the scope of director’ power. In addition, an essential problem might be arisen…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Blackmores Company Analyses

    • 3602 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Jones, T. & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/259075…

    • 3602 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A stakeholder who is able to effectively parlay their power and influence can have a profound impact in how that particular organization conducts business on many levels which, in turn, may create some rethinking and reposturing of the mission, vision, and strategy of an organization. It is certainly in the best interest of the organization to build strong relationships with their many stakeholders so as to add value to their overall brand and image (Lawrence & Weber, 2011).…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Csr Ryanair

    • 3593 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Chilosi, A and Damiani, M. (2007). "Stakeholders vs shareholders in corporate government". Munich Personal RePEc Archive. PN, 2334, p. 1-50.…

    • 3593 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    I don’t agree with Dunlap’s view that shareholders are the only constituencies about which corporate directors and executives should be concerned. In light of agents’ obligations to principals, managers are supposed act in the best interest of the company’s shareholders, the major capital providers, when making decisions; however, as shareholders and stakeholders interests are to a large extent compatible, especially from a long-term perspective, managers should also take into consideration the interests of multiple constituencies when operating a company. For example, both shareholders and customers may benefit from a company’s successful research and development (R&D) projects on cutting-edge products as customers can have high-value products while shareholders may profit considerably from the sales. Meanwhile, like shareholders, stakeholders also have their rights that managers should not treat with negligence. Below are some examples: customers have the right to receive safe products that they purchase; lenders have the right to receive interests at a negotiated rate and principal at maturity; employees have the right to work in a safe environment and be treated with respect for their dignity and human rights; competitors have the right to be treated fairly without groundless slanders or violation of their intellectual properties. Some of stakeholders’ rights are stated clearly in different laws and regulations, which aim to protect stakeholders and reinforce a business entity’s accountability to its multiple constituencies. Also, stakeholders can earn some rights due to their initiative positions in market. For instance, given the lenders’ finite resources for lending, lenders enjoy the right to acquire further disclosure regarding borrowers’ business or other concerns because they can decide whether or not to lend money to a certain prospective borrower. Likewise, customers…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Introduction In June 2009, more than 1,000 MBA students from several top business schools signed…

    • 7088 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every stakeholder of a company has their own rights with corresponding responsibilities. These must be given to them with due respect. It may differ depending on how they function in a company and how they can affect in the company’s performance. Nevertheless, each functions is essential and vital to the company’s operations, thus, each individual must also be given the rights which are really due for them.…

    • 3080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays