Preview

St. Thomas And Locke Compare And Contrast

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
St. Thomas And Locke Compare And Contrast
The world today is a combination, a blend of the two extremes fleshed out by the four authors we studied. St. Thomas and Locke display a world viewed through rose colored glasses. As much as people today want to believe that everyone exhibits behavior that Locke and St. Thomas consider good if they are left to their own devices with only laws to keep them in place, it is an unrealistic view of the world as we know it. In order for the world to run effectively, people have adopted a system closer to the societies Hobbes and Machiavelli described—one of safety under a sovereign ruler. People recognize the need to retain some fear to ensure that they are safe from other people. Most would rather give up some of their freedom for safety from central governance then attempt to fend for themselves because they know that although the world isn’t as chaotic as Hobbes and Machiavelli describe, it is not as peaceful as the world envisioned by St. Thomas and Locke. …show more content…
Thomas believes that rational human beings first recognize the importance of preserving life to any extent. Additionally, to achieve rationality, humans must actively seek out all that preserves life, including undertaking what is necessary for survival and happiness. Third, St. Thomas emphasizes that knowledge is “acquired by the efforts of reason” (18). In order for humans to be rational, they must embrace the desire to learn and understand God, nature, and themselves. Locke proclaims that people are rational and that all men live in a state of equality so “men are perfectly free to order their actions…in any way they like…subject only to limits set by the law of nature” (3). Therefore, to be rational in the eyes of Locke, humans must follow the law of nature, and failure to follow this natural law results in a punishment to fit the crime. These authors describe a world where rationality permits happiness and freedom, but only to the extent that it is enjoyed within the natural

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke) People are born equal and should not be judged or treated differently by what he or she…

    • 573 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this journal Armitag stated that John Locke has turned into an essential connection in the historical chain joining liberalism with colonialism. The purposes behind this are essentially true to live. From 1669 to 1675, the Proprietors of infant colony of Carolina among them his benefactor Anthony Ashley Cooper, also known as Earl of Shaftesbury employed Locke as their secretary. From October 1673 to December 1674, he was secretary and after that likewise simultaneously treasurer to the English Council of Trade and Foreign Plantations. Two decades later, close to the end of his life, he was secretary to its successor, the Board of Trade, from 1696 to 1700. This decade of administration in both private and open provincial organization furnished…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIST Assignment 1

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Life, liberty, and property” are the main ideas of Locke’s natural law theory. Locke claims that “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind who will but consult it that, being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm one another in his life, health, liberty, or possession…” (SB, 35). According to Locke, in the state of nature, there is a set of universal law which depends on human reason and human nature. Every human being is naturally equal and free under any circumstance. The law educates all human beings to live in one livable community where everyone should treat others equally and peacefully. In addition, no one should destroy or control other human lives such as having them as servants for one business. Every member in the community should join together into one group for their amicable life and in order to maintain a civil society.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In This essay I will be explaining Locke's point of view on the influence he had on the Declaration of independence.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s perspective is the opposite extreme of what John Locke stood for. He characterized the natural state of people as that of a state of, “war of every man against every man.” He also portrays all men as being equal, but equal in the sense that anyone can kill anyone else, and as a result of this, they live in constant fear and anxiety. He argues that man uses logic to deduce that the only reasonable way to protect one’s life is to gain enough power to control a state and to protect those who live under that particular state, gaining allies (which eliminates enemies in the process).…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His theory of government by the consent of the governed as a means to protect"Life, liberty and estate" deeply influenced the United States' founding documents. His political theory of government by the consent of the governed as a means to protect "Life, liberty and estate" deeply influenced the United States' founding documents. Between 1652 and 1667, John Locke was a student and then lecturer at Christ Church, Oxford, where he focused on the standard curriculum of logic, metaphysics and classics. In 1666 Locke met the parliamentarian Anthony Ashley Cooper, later the first Earl of Shaftesbury. The two struck up a friendship that blossomed into full patronage, and a year later Locke was appointed physician to Shaftesbury's household. For the next two…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment was a time of change in Europe. There were many new ideas, and various influential thinkers that inspired new invention and also inspired revolutions. All of these thinkers had different views on people and government and different views of people and how they act. Many of these authoritative individuals thoughts still influence us even today. Many of their ideas are used in government and also as guidelines for people to live their lives by.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke vs Hobbes

    • 4270 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The concept of human security, which has had a crucial place in human's societal history, has been argued over by many great philosophers throughout mankind’s existence. Two pioneer thinkers of political philosophy, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, theorized state of nature typologies, which are the core of social contract theory, and created a concept of modern security, even in the 17th century. Hobbes created a contract entrusting absolute power to the sovereign, which thrived off of the individual's duty and responsibilities to the government. Contrary to Hobbes, Locke recognized the secure relationship between individuals' rights and liberties and the role of the sovereign. These two philosophers revolutionized liberal thinking in the height of the enlightenment age in which many philosophers questioned and argued over the relationship between the state and the individual. Hobbes and Locke, two brilliant thinkers, are notorious for being the founders of social contract liberalism. Before one can look at each philosopher’s social contract, we must first define what separated their thinking from the standard at that time, and what actually made them liberal thinkers. There had been one way of thinking in governmental rule for thousands of years which had been formed around the tyrannical ideals of hereditary privilege, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. These governmental ideals, which extremely lacked rights for the individual, had been spread all over the world for thousands of years and throughout many empires. What made Locke and Hobbes such liberal thinkers, was their ideas of a mutual relationship between the individual and the state. This was a mutual contract in which both parties had an agreement where they could coincide, benefit, and enforce the liberal ideals of liberty, equality, and justice. Now one must dive into both philosophers proposed social contract, to get a…

    • 4270 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment and the Great Awakening brought with it the transitioning from old ideas about authority and religion towards individuality, and this was an important part of the process of freedom to come in the near future (Schultz, 2014). Moreover, prior to the Enlightenment and Great Awakening, the Western world believed that their rulers were more important than them, that a person could not change society, and that the life was a temporary stop between heaven or hell (Schultz, 2009). However, educated thinkers were beginning to question the old beliefs and instead hypothesized that: a person’s environment helped shaped who they became, each individual had the undisputable right to live freely with land, and that the price of a product should be in direct correlation to its availability and consumers desire for it.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Locke

    • 8282 Words
    • 36 Pages

    John Locke, an Englishman who lived from 1632 to 1704, promoted some of the most influential ideas of the Enlightenment. He pioneered the idea that humans are naturally good, and are corrupted by society or government to becoming deviant. Locke described this idea in hisAn Essay Concerning Human Understanding as the tabula rasa, a Latin phrase meaning blank slate. The idea was not original to him, however. In fact, Locke directly took the idea from a Muslim philosopher from the 1100s, Ibn Tufail. In Ibn Tufails book,Hayy ibn Yaqdhan, he describes an identical idea about how humans act as a blank slate, absorbing experiences and information from their surroundings. The same idea manifests itself in the life of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him). He stated that No child is born except on the fitra. Fitra here can be defined as the natural, pure state of a person. According to Islamic thought, all humans are born in a natural state of purity, with belief in one God, and that as they grow older, they adopt the ideas and beliefs of the people around them, particularly their parents. This is the intellectual forerunner of the tabula rasa that Locke learned from Ibn Tufail. Hb(k/LT02goUXVTUsUyTUVFUP…

    • 8282 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He suggests that natural laws normally demand that punishment fit the crime. On the same note, an individual in a state of nature can rectify any crime to prevent or dissuade the offender from repeating it. He concludes by suggesting that everybody is in a state of nature until an agreement is drawn between them to make them members of a political society (Locke and Hay…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Safety over Freedom

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By giving up a percentage of freedom, people in turn receive safety by creating restrictive laws, dealing punishments, and developing intricate procedures as seen when governments have dealt with drug use, terrorism, and vehicular management. Time and time again philosophers have come to agreement that a social contract exists. In this social contract people allow government to rule over them to create order because man’s general state of nature is as unruly as it is brutish. To be completely free would not be ideal to any society in existence; complete anarchy would engulf nations and cause terrible destruction. The pursuit of safety is driven by fear creating better conditions for the majority over whatever an individual would prefer.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke (1632 – 1704), a philosopher and a scientist, contributed much to the realms of philosophy, law, and politics. He put into question the idea of innatism and whether people were truly born with some basic knowledge. He strongly believed in the innate goodness of humans and the right to freedom and property of the people. Both Innate ideas and Empiricism will be further analyzed, and whether Locke’s ‘children and idiots’ argument against innate ideas is sound. Locke believes that people are born with blank slates, and that knowledge is acquired throughout one’s life through experiences and sensations.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays