Preview

St. Augustine and Free Will

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
943 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
St. Augustine and Free Will
By Christine Murray
©Catholic Online 2004
People have always to determine the role of the free will in life indeed, whether they have one at all. As we approach the Catholic feast day of St. Augustine on Aug. 28, it is good to examine his writings on the subject, especially in Free Choice of the Will.
He assumes the will is free and seeks to determine how we choose good or evil. This continues to be “debated” in our age and has great implications on one’s perspective on life. The Catholic faith helps us understand how free will works. Sadly, many in society do not. How one answers the question of free will often helps determine whether one believes life has any ultimate “meaning” at all.
Augustine’s approach to the “free choice of the will” assumes that “there can be no denying that we have a will.” Instead, Augustine defines “good will” as “a will by which we seek to live a good and upright life and to attain unto perfect wisdom” which, of course, assumes that it is free. This is worth meditating on while considering the literal Latin translation of the first two are not meant for “stuff,” but rather for God. The Catechism of the Catholic Church echoes this, saying, “Endowed with a spiritual soul, with intellect and with free will, the human person is from his very conception ordered to God and destined for eternal beatitude.” (1711).
In fact, a free will that does not seek God clings to material things, which are so easily lost in everything from hurricanes to death. Those who choose evil are ruled by their passion and desire for things of this world. This is futile because they only have, as Augustine says, “the love of things which each one can lose against his will.” It is ironic, isn’t it? One who chooses to do good ultimately gains everything because there is no fear of losing “things” due to lack of attachment to them. Those who becomes perfect could lose every material thing and still gain all precisely because they are trying to attain the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    G Strawson and Free Will

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    which side of the fence you fall on in the debate about the truth of determinism. I will define the concept of ultimate moral responsibility (UMR) and show how it plays a fundamental role in Strawson's argument. Finally, I will offer my own criticism of Galen Strawson's view of free will and UMR, and suggest a solution to the problem I bring up.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article, "The Case against Free Will" James Rachels investigates the idea of choice and what makes through and through freedom a vital idea. Rachels additionally contends that just individual and God have unrestrained choice, yet God's ability with the expectation of complimentary will is still under inquiries. There are several main point Rachel mention in this article. Rachels says Darrow’s resistance that individuals that never in charge of their activities, in light of the fact that their activities are brought on by strengths past their control.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been a phenomenological debate on how free “free will” truly is from time immemorial; as long as humanity has been self-aware they have wondered if their decisions are their own. This curiosity has reared its head in theology, philosophy, literature, and more recently the fields of psychology, cognitive science, and sociology. The Catholic Christian tradition has long supported the idea that one is in control of one’s own thoughts and actions and therefore is responsible for said thoughts and actions. Calvinism, however, has largely disagreed with this sentiment in stating that there is no free will, that all our thoughts and actions are fated, and that one’s place in Heaven or one’s place in Hell is predetermined. Predestination, as this is called, was prominent in Scotland at the time William Shakespeare’s Macbeth was being written. At this time a Scottish, Protestant King has united his crown with that of England and a year before its creation there was a Catholic plot to assassinate this King, all of his advisors, and the other Protestant politicians of the time. These are events…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free will is something that humans have killed one another over. As human beings it is in our nature to want complete control over what is happening in our lives, however that is impossible. Being in control of our goals and choices we are able to change our lives and mold our future.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustine called evil the privation of good and not a substance. It comes from the sins that Adam and Eve had done in the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 3 Adam and Eve were enticed to take the fruit off the tree of knowledge because Satan said so, even though God said not to go anywhere near it, it was up to them to make their free decision. Therefore Augustine believed God saw humanities misuse of free will and therefore planned that the people who abuse the use of free will can go to hell however those who use free will wisely will be saved and go to heaven. However Augustine’s idea of privation does not apply when you lac something you should have. For example if you can’t walk you lack the health you should have.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If free will did not exist then how does it explain the good in evil in the world. For instance if God knew peoples destiny’s he would have it to where we would all choose to be good and holy as opposed to bad. But, this isn't the case because there is in fact bad out there in the world and the reason is because we as humans were given the right to choose for ourselves. Not only is there free will to choose between right and wrong but there also to love. We have the free will to love anyone we want and as many people as we want. If free will didn't exist then we would only be able to love one person for our life time which again isn't the case because there are so many divorces taking place because people fall out of love with each other. Another example is a prisoner may be said to possess no freedom, however he or she still possesses limited choices. In the very least the imprisoned human has the ability to make some action not determined by the institution whether it be to end his or her life or simply to speak certain words or make a specific eye…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Well, breaking it down that is not what free will defines. Free will is the ability to make his or her own decision. To some extent determinism (not to be confused with hard determinism) and free will can both collaborate together making our world. Yes, something had to create us, but when we are born we are born with a desire to follow our hearts. We are designed to have our own free will. Although it may seem like hard determinism derails free will's argument it is an incorrect accusation at a completely different topic not in relation to free will. If we used hard determinism, that would mean that no one is held accountable to their actions or morals. With their philosophy it would mean that everything was planned out and whatever happens was planned to happen. So with that in mind it does not matter if I steal because it was supposed to happen, etc. I believe God gave us free will to further the Kingdom of God, and because He wants us to choose Him, not be forced to love…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion is the official definition of free will. With free will, God gave us the choice to do whatever we want. With the devil tempting us, we are more inclined to choose evil over bad, but with God’s influence we choose good. Plus if humans were naturally evil everything we know about God is a lie. There are people who believe that the bible states that humans are born evil, however, it does not mentions the word evil. The bible states that humans are all born with original sin, the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, held to be inherited from Adam in consequence of the Fall. Because of free will and moral standards we choose what we know is right, deep in our hearts, human beings fear God ,therefore, it is in our nature to please…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Prospect outlook regarding grace he stressed that man has no say in their destiny since God the ultimate decision maker decides each and everyone’s destiny. While Augustine has died long ago, contemporary theologians are still interested in his writings regarding free will, grace, salvation and predestination which was said to have been intended for Pagans and Christians alike. Augustine argues that one’s moral up bringing has a lot to do with his actions, whether good or bad. He further states that the will to do good or bad is brought forth after a struggle with the human conscience. He mentioned that free choice is made with motivation of which whether good or bad each one is responsible. He implied that once certain habits become habitual it is beyond our control, hence we have no control over how we behave. Prosper in his work also agreed that we are slaves to sin and can only do good if God allows him…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This week’s essay is a comparative analysis of the theories of freedom (indeterminism) and predestination (religious determinism). Our analysis will attempt to prove the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination. First, we will examine the theory of predestination as it is explained in the text “Ethics: Theory and Practice” (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012). The organization of the text lends itself to our analysis since it highlights differences between the two theories in its defining process. We will illustrate the theory of predestination by offering an example which will humanize the theory. Next, we will explore the theory of freedom through the lens of predestination. We will then exhibit the theory of freedom with an example. Finally, we will analyze and compare the two theories by demonstrating their applicability for today’s society and arguing the superiority of the theory of freedom over the theory of predestination.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    t Augustine 354-430 CE, developed a theodicy in order to tackle the ‘Problem of Evil’, the seeming contradiction between God being omnipotent, omnibenevolent and there still being evil in the world. As a Christian, he believed that God had made everything that exists, and that at the moment of creation, everything was perfect, because ‘God saw all that he had made, and it was very good’ Genesis 1: 31. He therefore concluded that ‘evil is not a substance’; it is merely ‘Privatio Boni’ or privation of good, because he thought that ‘things which are liable to corruption are good’, otherwise they cannot be corrupted.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free will is the concept that humanity has the ability to make their own choices, this suggests that humanity has a moral understanding that is inherent and God given. Some people argue that you are born with this morality and it does not develop. Christians would argue that this morality is god given, and that we merely develop it through our upbringing. If Christians accept the concept of God, then it is necessary that they view God as omniscient, this would suggest he knows everything we have done and everything we will do, thus taking away free will. However, many Christians take the view that god gave us free will after he cast Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. In this way moral responsibility can exist and there can be a differentiation between a person who acts morally and immorally because there is now the option of choice.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustine said, “You see, then, I imagine, that it is in the power of our will to enjoy or to be without so great and so true a good”. Augustine clearly argues that man is free to either observe or disregard God’s law. Errors in cupidity are the sole responsibility of the individual, and man’s ignorance and sinful nature are the just punishments. Again, Augustine comments, “For those who are happy—and they must also be good—are not happy simply because they wish to live happily. The bad also have the same wish. They are happy because they live rightly, which the bad do not wish to do so”.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evil can be used in two ways- when someone has done evil and when someone has suffered evil. Since God is good, God does no moral evil; however, because God is just, God punishes the wicked and thus causes the evil of punishment. People are the cause of their own evildoing. Furthermore, because learning is good a thing, we do not learn evil. It is people’s inordinate desires that drive their evildoings.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The hardest thing to learn in life is which bridge to cross and which to burn.”…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays